Understanding the Impact of Different Modes of Information Provision on Preferences for a Newborn Bloodspot Screening Program in the United Kingdom.

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES MDM Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2024-03-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23814683241232935
Stuart J Wright, Caroline M Vass, Fiona Ulph, Katherine Payne
{"title":"Understanding the Impact of Different Modes of Information Provision on Preferences for a Newborn Bloodspot Screening Program in the United Kingdom.","authors":"Stuart J Wright, Caroline M Vass, Fiona Ulph, Katherine Payne","doi":"10.1177/23814683241232935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> This study aimed to understand the impact of alternative modes of information provision on the stated preferences of a sample of the public for attributes of newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) in the United Kingdom. <b>Methods.</b> An online discrete choice experiment survey was designed using 4 attributes to describe NBS (effect of treatment on the condition, time to receive results, whether the bloodspot is stored, false-positive rate). Survey respondents were randomized to 1 of 2 survey versions presenting the background training materials using text from a leaflet (leaflet version) or an animation (animation version). Heteroskedastic conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the effect of mode of information provision on error variance. <b>Results.</b> The survey was completed by 1,000 respondents (leaflet = 525; animation = 475). Preferences for the attributes in the DCE were the same in both groups, but the group receiving the animation version had 9% less error variance in their responses. Respondents completing the animation version gave higher ratings compared with the leaflet version in terms of ease of perceived understanding. Subgroup analysis suggested that the animation was particularly effective at reducing error variance for women (20%), people with previous children (16.5%), and people between the ages of 35 and 45 y (11.8%). <b>Limitations.</b> This study used simple DCE with 4 attributes, and the results may vary for more complex choice questions. <b>Conclusion.</b> This study provides evidence that that supplementing the information package offered to parents choosing to take part in NBS with an animation may aid them their decision making. Further research would be needed to test the animation in the health system. <b>Implications.</b> Researchers designing DCE should carefully consider the design of their training materials to improve the quality of data collected.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Prior to completing a discrete choice experiment about newborn bloodspot screening, respondents were shown information using either a leaflet-based or animated format.Respondents receiving information using an animation version reported that the information was slightly easier to understand and exhibited 9% less error variance in expressing their preferences for a newborn screening program.Using the animation version to present information appeared to have a larger impact in reducing the error variance of responses for specific respondents including women, individuals with children, individuals between the ages of 35 and 45 y, and individuals educated to degree level.</p>","PeriodicalId":36567,"journal":{"name":"MDM Policy and Practice","volume":"9 1","pages":"23814683241232935"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10913504/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MDM Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683241232935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. This study aimed to understand the impact of alternative modes of information provision on the stated preferences of a sample of the public for attributes of newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) in the United Kingdom. Methods. An online discrete choice experiment survey was designed using 4 attributes to describe NBS (effect of treatment on the condition, time to receive results, whether the bloodspot is stored, false-positive rate). Survey respondents were randomized to 1 of 2 survey versions presenting the background training materials using text from a leaflet (leaflet version) or an animation (animation version). Heteroskedastic conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the effect of mode of information provision on error variance. Results. The survey was completed by 1,000 respondents (leaflet = 525; animation = 475). Preferences for the attributes in the DCE were the same in both groups, but the group receiving the animation version had 9% less error variance in their responses. Respondents completing the animation version gave higher ratings compared with the leaflet version in terms of ease of perceived understanding. Subgroup analysis suggested that the animation was particularly effective at reducing error variance for women (20%), people with previous children (16.5%), and people between the ages of 35 and 45 y (11.8%). Limitations. This study used simple DCE with 4 attributes, and the results may vary for more complex choice questions. Conclusion. This study provides evidence that that supplementing the information package offered to parents choosing to take part in NBS with an animation may aid them their decision making. Further research would be needed to test the animation in the health system. Implications. Researchers designing DCE should carefully consider the design of their training materials to improve the quality of data collected.

Highlights: Prior to completing a discrete choice experiment about newborn bloodspot screening, respondents were shown information using either a leaflet-based or animated format.Respondents receiving information using an animation version reported that the information was slightly easier to understand and exhibited 9% less error variance in expressing their preferences for a newborn screening program.Using the animation version to present information appeared to have a larger impact in reducing the error variance of responses for specific respondents including women, individuals with children, individuals between the ages of 35 and 45 y, and individuals educated to degree level.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解不同信息提供模式对英国新生儿血斑筛查计划偏好的影响。
导言。本研究旨在了解英国新生儿血斑筛查(NBS)的其他信息提供方式对样本公众的既定偏好的影响。调查方法设计了一项在线离散选择实验调查,使用 4 个属性来描述 NBS(治疗对病情的影响、收到结果的时间、是否储存血点、假阳性率)。调查对象被随机分配到 2 个调查版本中的 1 个,这 2 个版本分别使用传单(传单版)或动画(动画版)中的文字介绍背景培训材料。采用异方差条件逻辑回归估计信息提供方式对误差方差的影响。结果共有 1000 名受访者完成了调查(传单版 = 525 人;动画版 = 475 人)。两组受访者对 DCE 中属性的偏好相同,但接受动画版本的受访者在回答中的误差方差减少了 9%。与传单版本相比,完成动画版本的受访者在易懂程度方面给出了更高的评分。分组分析表明,动画在减少女性(20%)、有过子女的人群(16.5%)和 35-45 岁人群(11.8%)的错误差异方面尤为有效。局限性。本研究使用了包含 4 个属性的简单 DCE,对于更复杂的选择问题,结果可能会有所不同。结论。本研究提供的证据表明,在向选择参加新生儿疾病筛查的父母提供的信息包中加入动画片可能有助于他们做出决定。需要进一步开展研究,在卫生系统中对动画进行测试。影响。设计离散实验的研究人员应仔细考虑培训材料的设计,以提高所收集数据的质量:在完成有关新生儿血斑筛查的离散选择实验之前,受访者会看到以传单或动画形式提供的信息。接受动画版信息的受访者表示,这些信息更容易理解,在表达他们对新生儿筛查项目的偏好时,误差方差减少了 9%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
MDM Policy and Practice
MDM Policy and Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Shared Decision Making and Its Association with Antiviral Therapy Adherence in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B: Single-Center Cross-Sectional Analysis. Understanding Factors Influencing Decision Making during Assessment of Potential Organ Donors: A Qualitative Study of Clinicians Assessing the Medical Suitability of Potential Donors. Treatment Preferences among Patients with Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer in France, Spain, China, South Korea, and Japan: A Discrete-Choice Experiment. Barriers and Facilitators for Shared Decision Making in Breast Reconstruction among Stakeholders in the Chinese Context: A Qualitative Study. Integrating Decision Science and Implementation Science to Inform Policy Decision Making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1