A comparative study of earthquake disaster management laws between USA and Indonesia.

IF 1.3 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies Pub Date : 2024-02-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4102/jamba.v16i1.1582
Ardianto B Rahmawan, Gabriela Eliana, Latif A Habibi, Alyca A Nariswari
{"title":"A comparative study of earthquake disaster management laws between USA and Indonesia.","authors":"Ardianto B Rahmawan, Gabriela Eliana, Latif A Habibi, Alyca A Nariswari","doi":"10.4102/jamba.v16i1.1582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The frequent occurrence of disasters because of Indonesia's geographical location within the Ring of Fire calls for effective disaster-management efforts. With the issuance of Law No. 24 of 2007 on Disaster Management, the Indonesian National Disaster Management Agency (Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana or BNPB) was subsequently established. Keeping in mind previous disasters in Indonesia which occur in different regions, that is, Palu and Aceh Tsunami, Cianjur earthquake, and Mount Merapi, Indonesia's disaster-management law is general and lacks technical guidelines in addressing the needs of the various regions and the different contours of geography. This article aims to analyse existing Indonesian regulatory and agency problems in disaster management by conducting a normative and comparative approach between the disaster management policy in the United States of America (USA) and Indonesia. The authors chose the USA's disaster-management policy in particular as most comparative studies on disaster management law do not involve the USA despite the State's ability to provide a comprehensive and consistent policy in the midst of the decentralisation of responsibilities with the numerous states. The authors conclude that according to existing disaster-management laws in USA and Indonesia, the government is obligated to fulfil its citizens' rights in the event of natural disasters. Furthermore, noting the issues that exist within the Indonesian disaster-management system, Indonesia can adopt the best practices of the USA to improve its disaster-management system. Among others, Indonesia can learn from the USA in the fields of accountability and transparency amongst agencies, the development of Early Warning Systems, an improved system of interagency cooperation, as well as the provision of specific disaster-management assistance.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>The findings of this study are expected to serve as evaluation material and to improve government effectiveness in dealing with natural disasters.</p>","PeriodicalId":51823,"journal":{"name":"Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10913167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v16i1.1582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The frequent occurrence of disasters because of Indonesia's geographical location within the Ring of Fire calls for effective disaster-management efforts. With the issuance of Law No. 24 of 2007 on Disaster Management, the Indonesian National Disaster Management Agency (Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana or BNPB) was subsequently established. Keeping in mind previous disasters in Indonesia which occur in different regions, that is, Palu and Aceh Tsunami, Cianjur earthquake, and Mount Merapi, Indonesia's disaster-management law is general and lacks technical guidelines in addressing the needs of the various regions and the different contours of geography. This article aims to analyse existing Indonesian regulatory and agency problems in disaster management by conducting a normative and comparative approach between the disaster management policy in the United States of America (USA) and Indonesia. The authors chose the USA's disaster-management policy in particular as most comparative studies on disaster management law do not involve the USA despite the State's ability to provide a comprehensive and consistent policy in the midst of the decentralisation of responsibilities with the numerous states. The authors conclude that according to existing disaster-management laws in USA and Indonesia, the government is obligated to fulfil its citizens' rights in the event of natural disasters. Furthermore, noting the issues that exist within the Indonesian disaster-management system, Indonesia can adopt the best practices of the USA to improve its disaster-management system. Among others, Indonesia can learn from the USA in the fields of accountability and transparency amongst agencies, the development of Early Warning Systems, an improved system of interagency cooperation, as well as the provision of specific disaster-management assistance.

Contribution: The findings of this study are expected to serve as evaluation material and to improve government effectiveness in dealing with natural disasters.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国和印度尼西亚地震灾害管理法比较研究。
由于印度尼西亚地处火环地带,灾害频发,因此需要开展有效的灾害管理工作。随着 2007 年第 24 号《灾害管理法》的颁布,印度尼西亚国家灾害管理局(Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana 或 BNPB)随后成立。考虑到印尼以往发生在不同地区的灾害,如帕卢湾和亚齐海啸、西雅努尔地震和默拉皮火山,印尼的灾害管理法较为笼统,缺乏针对不同地区和不同地理轮廓需求的技术指南。本文旨在通过对美利坚合众国(美国)和印尼的灾害管理政策进行规范和比较,分析印尼在灾害管理方面现有的法规和机构问题。作者特别选择了美国的灾害管理政策,因为大多数关于灾害管理法的比较研究都没有涉及美国,尽管美国有能力在责任分散、州众多的情况下提供全面一致的政策。作者得出结论,根据美国和印度尼西亚现有的灾害管理法,政府有义务在发生自然灾害时实现公民的权利。此外,注意到印尼灾害管理系统中存在的问题,印尼可以采用美国的最佳做法来改进其灾害管理系统。其中,印尼可向美国学习的领域包括机构间的问责制和透明度、预警系统的开发、机构间合作系统的改进以及具体灾害管理援助的提供:本研究的结果有望作为评估材料,并提高政府应对自然灾害的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies
Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
37 weeks
期刊最新文献
Efundja as a risk driver and change agent for the Cuvelai-Etosha basin rural communities. Revealing the boon and bane of South Africa's disaster management legislation during COVID-19. A tool for the assessment of the risk drivers and public perception of WASH in South Africa. Statutory and policy-based eco-disaster risk reduction in SADC member states. Disaster risk from diarrhoeal diseases and WASH in South Africa and Botswana in MDG time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1