Risk quantization by magnitude and propensity

IF 1.9 2区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Insurance Mathematics & Economics Pub Date : 2024-03-05 DOI:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2024.02.005
Olivier P. Faugeras , Gilles Pagès
{"title":"Risk quantization by magnitude and propensity","authors":"Olivier P. Faugeras ,&nbsp;Gilles Pagès","doi":"10.1016/j.insmatheco.2024.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We propose a novel approach in the assessment of a random risk variable <em>X</em> by introducing magnitude-propensity risk measures <span><math><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>m</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>X</mi></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>X</mi></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo></math></span>. This bivariate measure intends to account for the dual aspect of risk, where the magnitudes <em>x</em> of <em>X</em> tell how high are the losses incurred, whereas the probabilities <span><math><mi>P</mi><mo>(</mo><mi>X</mi><mo>=</mo><mi>x</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span> reveal how often one has to expect to suffer such losses. The basic idea is to simultaneously quantify both the severity <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>m</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>X</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> and the propensity <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>X</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> of the real-valued risk <em>X</em>. This is to be contrasted with traditional univariate risk measures, like VaR or CVaR, which typically conflate both effects. In its simplest form, <span><math><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>m</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>X</mi></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>X</mi></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo></math></span> is obtained by mass transportation in Wasserstein metric of the law of <em>X</em> to a two-points <span><math><mo>{</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>,</mo><msub><mrow><mi>m</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>X</mi></mrow></msub><mo>}</mo></math></span> discrete distribution with mass <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>X</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> at <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>m</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>X</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>. The approach can also be formulated as a constrained optimal quantization problem. This allows for an informative comparison of risks on both the magnitude and propensity scales. Several examples illustrate the usefulness of the proposed approach. Some variants, extensions and applications are also considered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54974,"journal":{"name":"Insurance Mathematics & Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668724000325/pdfft?md5=980ec9ef940c4445bf5515f1cd52e4b3&pid=1-s2.0-S0167668724000325-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insurance Mathematics & Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668724000325","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We propose a novel approach in the assessment of a random risk variable X by introducing magnitude-propensity risk measures (mX,pX). This bivariate measure intends to account for the dual aspect of risk, where the magnitudes x of X tell how high are the losses incurred, whereas the probabilities P(X=x) reveal how often one has to expect to suffer such losses. The basic idea is to simultaneously quantify both the severity mX and the propensity pX of the real-valued risk X. This is to be contrasted with traditional univariate risk measures, like VaR or CVaR, which typically conflate both effects. In its simplest form, (mX,pX) is obtained by mass transportation in Wasserstein metric of the law of X to a two-points {0,mX} discrete distribution with mass pX at mX. The approach can also be formulated as a constrained optimal quantization problem. This allows for an informative comparison of risks on both the magnitude and propensity scales. Several examples illustrate the usefulness of the proposed approach. Some variants, extensions and applications are also considered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
按规模和倾向量化风险
我们提出了一种评估随机风险变量 X 的新方法,即引入风险概率(mX,pX)。这种二元风险度量旨在考虑风险的双重性,即 X 的大小 x 反映了所造成的损失有多大,而概率 P(X=x) 则揭示了人们预期遭受此类损失的频率有多高。其基本思想是同时量化实值风险 X 的严重性 mX 和倾向性 pX,这与传统的单变量风险度量(如 VaR 或 CVaR)不同,后者通常将两种效应混为一谈。在最简单的形式中,(mX,pX) 是通过将 X 的规律以 Wasserstein 度量进行质量运算得到的,即在 mX 处具有质量 pX 的两点{0,mX}离散分布。该方法也可表述为受约束的最优量化问题。这样就可以对风险大小和倾向尺度进行信息比较。几个例子说明了所提方法的实用性。此外,还考虑了一些变体、扩展和应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Insurance Mathematics & Economics
Insurance Mathematics & Economics 管理科学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
90
审稿时长
17.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Insurance: Mathematics and Economics publishes leading research spanning all fields of actuarial science research. It appears six times per year and is the largest journal in actuarial science research around the world. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics is an international academic journal that aims to strengthen the communication between individuals and groups who develop and apply research results in actuarial science. The journal feels a particular obligation to facilitate closer cooperation between those who conduct research in insurance mathematics and quantitative insurance economics, and practicing actuaries who are interested in the implementation of the results. To this purpose, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics publishes high-quality articles of broad international interest, concerned with either the theory of insurance mathematics and quantitative insurance economics or the inventive application of it, including empirical or experimental results. Articles that combine several of these aspects are particularly considered.
期刊最新文献
A new characterization of second-order stochastic dominance Bivariate Tail Conditional Co-Expectation for elliptical distributions Egalitarian pooling and sharing of longevity risk a.k.a. can an administrator help skin the tontine cat? A two-layer stochastic game approach to reinsurance contracting and competition Optimal insurance design under asymmetric Nash bargaining
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1