Feasibility of using real-world free thyroxine data from the US and Europe to enable fast and efficient transfer of reference intervals from one population to another

IF 1.7 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Practical Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00382
Hedwig Kurka , Peter Dilba , Carlos Castillo Perez , Peter Findeisen , Ignacio Gadea Gironés , Alex Katayev , Laura Rodríguez Alonso , André Valcour , Thorsten Rehberg , Benedikt Weber , Horst Donner , Anja Thorenz
{"title":"Feasibility of using real-world free thyroxine data from the US and Europe to enable fast and efficient transfer of reference intervals from one population to another","authors":"Hedwig Kurka ,&nbsp;Peter Dilba ,&nbsp;Carlos Castillo Perez ,&nbsp;Peter Findeisen ,&nbsp;Ignacio Gadea Gironés ,&nbsp;Alex Katayev ,&nbsp;Laura Rodríguez Alonso ,&nbsp;André Valcour ,&nbsp;Thorsten Rehberg ,&nbsp;Benedikt Weber ,&nbsp;Horst Donner ,&nbsp;Anja Thorenz","doi":"10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The direct approach for determining reference intervals (RIs) is not always practical. This study aimed to generate evidence that a real-world data (RWD) approach could be applied to transfer free thyroxine RIs determined in one population to a second population, presenting an alternative to performing multiple RI determinations.</p></div><div><h3>Design and methods</h3><p>Two datasets (US, n = 10,000; Europe, n = 10,000) were created from existing RWD. Descriptive statistics, density plots and cumulative distributions were produced for each data set and comparisons made. Cumulative probabilities at the lower and upper limits of the RIs were identified using an empirical cumulative distribution function. According to these probabilities, estimated percentiles for each dataset and estimated differences between the two sets of percentiles were obtained by case resampling bootstrapping. The estimated differences were then evaluated against a pre-determined acceptance criterion of ≤7.8% (inter-individual biological variability). The direct approach was used to validate the RWD approach.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The RWD approach provided similar descriptive statistics for both populations (mean: US = 16.1 pmol/L, Europe = 16.4 pmol/L; median: US = 15.4 pmol/L, Europe = 15.8 pmol/L). Differences between the estimated percentiles at the upper and lower limits of the RIs fulfilled the pre-determined acceptance criterion and the density plots and cumulative distributions demonstrated population homogeneity. Similar RI distributions were observed using the direct approach.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study provides evidence that a RWD approach can be used to transfer RIs determined in one population to another.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20421,"journal":{"name":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article e00382"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000283/pdfft?md5=aa43c4abd2673d17687186c2252deb4a&pid=1-s2.0-S2352551724000283-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The direct approach for determining reference intervals (RIs) is not always practical. This study aimed to generate evidence that a real-world data (RWD) approach could be applied to transfer free thyroxine RIs determined in one population to a second population, presenting an alternative to performing multiple RI determinations.

Design and methods

Two datasets (US, n = 10,000; Europe, n = 10,000) were created from existing RWD. Descriptive statistics, density plots and cumulative distributions were produced for each data set and comparisons made. Cumulative probabilities at the lower and upper limits of the RIs were identified using an empirical cumulative distribution function. According to these probabilities, estimated percentiles for each dataset and estimated differences between the two sets of percentiles were obtained by case resampling bootstrapping. The estimated differences were then evaluated against a pre-determined acceptance criterion of ≤7.8% (inter-individual biological variability). The direct approach was used to validate the RWD approach.

Results

The RWD approach provided similar descriptive statistics for both populations (mean: US = 16.1 pmol/L, Europe = 16.4 pmol/L; median: US = 15.4 pmol/L, Europe = 15.8 pmol/L). Differences between the estimated percentiles at the upper and lower limits of the RIs fulfilled the pre-determined acceptance criterion and the density plots and cumulative distributions demonstrated population homogeneity. Similar RI distributions were observed using the direct approach.

Conclusions

This study provides evidence that a RWD approach can be used to transfer RIs determined in one population to another.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用来自美国和欧洲的真实游离甲状腺素数据,快速有效地将参考区间从一个人群转移到另一个人群的可行性
目标直接确定参考区间(RI)的方法并不总是实用的。本研究旨在提供证据,证明真实世界数据(RWD)方法可用于将在一个人群中确定的游离甲状腺素参考区间转移到另一个人群中,为进行多次参考区间测定提供了一种替代方法。设计与方法根据现有的 RWD 创建了两个数据集(美国,n = 10,000;欧洲,n = 10,000)。对每个数据集进行描述性统计、绘制密度图和累积分布图,并进行比较。使用经验累积分布函数确定了区域指示下限和上限的累积概率。根据这些概率,每个数据集的估计百分位数和两组百分位数之间的估计差异都是通过个案重采样引导法获得的。然后根据预先确定的≤7.8%(个体间生物变异性)的接受标准对估计差异进行评估。结果 RWD 方法为两种人群提供了相似的描述性统计(平均值:US = 16.1 pmol/L):美国 = 16.1 pmol/L,欧洲 = 16.4 pmol/L;中位数:美国 = 15.4 pmol/L,欧洲 = 15.8 pmol/L)。RIs上限和下限的估计百分位数之间的差异符合预先确定的接受标准,密度图和累积分布显示了群体的同质性。本研究提供的证据表明,RWD 方法可用于将在一个人群中确定的 RI 转移到另一个人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Practical Laboratory Medicine
Practical Laboratory Medicine Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: Practical Laboratory Medicine is a high-quality, peer-reviewed, international open-access journal publishing original research, new methods and critical evaluations, case reports and short papers in the fields of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. The objective of the journal is to provide practical information of immediate relevance to workers in clinical laboratories. The primary scope of the journal covers clinical chemistry, hematology, molecular biology and genetics relevant to laboratory medicine, microbiology, immunology, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory management and informatics. We welcome papers which describe critical evaluations of biomarkers and their role in the diagnosis and treatment of clinically significant disease, validation of commercial and in-house IVD methods, method comparisons, interference reports, the development of new reagents and reference materials, reference range studies and regulatory compliance reports. Manuscripts describing the development of new methods applicable to laboratory medicine (including point-of-care testing) are particularly encouraged, even if preliminary or small scale.
期刊最新文献
Development of a rapid LFA test based on direct RT-LAMP for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 The measurement of immunosuppressive drugs by mass spectrometry and immunoassay in a South African transplant setting Falsely abnormal serum protein electrophoresis after administration of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG): A retrospective cohort study Glycated albumin in pregnancy correlates negatively with body mass index and contributes to the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus A novel case of Hb Bart's hydrops fetalis following prenatal diagnosis: Case report from Huizhou, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1