Eduard Kuric , Peter Demcak , Matus Krajcovic , Peter Nemcek
{"title":"Is mouse dynamics information credible for user behavior research? An empirical investigation","authors":"Eduard Kuric , Peter Demcak , Matus Krajcovic , Peter Nemcek","doi":"10.1016/j.csi.2024.103849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Mouse dynamics, information on user’s interaction with a computer mouse, are in vogue in machine learning for purposes such as recommendations, personalization, prediction of user characteristics and behavioral biometrics. We point out a blind spot in current works involving mouse dynamics that originates in underestimating the gravity of the characteristics of the mouse device and configuration on the data that mouse dynamics are inferred from. In a controlled study with <span><math><mrow><mi>N</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>32</mn></mrow></math></span> participants, across three kinds of mouse interaction activities, we collect data for mouse dynamics utilizing a variety of mouse parameter configurations. We show that mouse dynamics commonly used in studies can be significantly altered by differences in mouse parameters. Out of 108 evaluated mouse dynamics metrics, 95 and 84 are affected between two conducted studies. A machine learning model’s performance can be warped by the mouse parameters being used. We demonstrate on a prediction task that mouse parameters cannot be approached uniformly and without consideration. We discuss methodological implications — how mouse dynamics studies should account for the diversity of mouse-related conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50635,"journal":{"name":"Computer Standards & Interfaces","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 103849"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920548924000187/pdfft?md5=22261c4aa60a750f67561046e5e7ba1b&pid=1-s2.0-S0920548924000187-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Standards & Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920548924000187","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Mouse dynamics, information on user’s interaction with a computer mouse, are in vogue in machine learning for purposes such as recommendations, personalization, prediction of user characteristics and behavioral biometrics. We point out a blind spot in current works involving mouse dynamics that originates in underestimating the gravity of the characteristics of the mouse device and configuration on the data that mouse dynamics are inferred from. In a controlled study with participants, across three kinds of mouse interaction activities, we collect data for mouse dynamics utilizing a variety of mouse parameter configurations. We show that mouse dynamics commonly used in studies can be significantly altered by differences in mouse parameters. Out of 108 evaluated mouse dynamics metrics, 95 and 84 are affected between two conducted studies. A machine learning model’s performance can be warped by the mouse parameters being used. We demonstrate on a prediction task that mouse parameters cannot be approached uniformly and without consideration. We discuss methodological implications — how mouse dynamics studies should account for the diversity of mouse-related conditions.
期刊介绍:
The quality of software, well-defined interfaces (hardware and software), the process of digitalisation, and accepted standards in these fields are essential for building and exploiting complex computing, communication, multimedia and measuring systems. Standards can simplify the design and construction of individual hardware and software components and help to ensure satisfactory interworking.
Computer Standards & Interfaces is an international journal dealing specifically with these topics.
The journal
• Provides information about activities and progress on the definition of computer standards, software quality, interfaces and methods, at national, European and international levels
• Publishes critical comments on standards and standards activities
• Disseminates user''s experiences and case studies in the application and exploitation of established or emerging standards, interfaces and methods
• Offers a forum for discussion on actual projects, standards, interfaces and methods by recognised experts
• Stimulates relevant research by providing a specialised refereed medium.