Informal prenatal genetic screening education: What can you learn from Google and YouTube?

Erin P. Johnson , Naomi O. Riches , Marwa W. Aljardali , Penelope Nussbaum , Evelyn Dean-Olmsted , Erin Rothwell
{"title":"Informal prenatal genetic screening education: What can you learn from Google and YouTube?","authors":"Erin P. Johnson ,&nbsp;Naomi O. Riches ,&nbsp;Marwa W. Aljardali ,&nbsp;Penelope Nussbaum ,&nbsp;Evelyn Dean-Olmsted ,&nbsp;Erin Rothwell","doi":"10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The goal of this article is to explore what online education and decision support tools are freely available to patients about prenatal screening.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We (1) conducted an environmental scan using Google Trends to identify and evaluate prenatal screening search terms, (2) created a list of websites and YouTube videos that would be easily accessed by a searcher, and (3) characterized the information within those websites and videos, including an examination of their qualities as a decision support tool and a readability analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Fifty websites, containing 62 unique educational resources, and 39 YouTube videos were analyzed. The websites were primarily educational, although the education was provided by a range of sources, including non-profit and for-profit organizations, universities, and governments (ie, public health departments). Readability scores of Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials for the sites ranged from 50% to 92%, with a median score of 74%. Two of the websites we evaluated met all of the limited decision support standards we applied; 4 of the websites included patient stories or experiences, and 8 included some element of values clarification. Videos were more likely to include values clarification.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The information available to patients online is variable. Although most is balanced and informative, much is difficult to read and missing key decision-making factors. Health care providers should work with patients to ensure they have basic comprehension of the prenatal genetic screening materials, possible result outcomes, and expected steps following a positive screening result.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100576,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine Open","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 101821"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949774424009671/pdfft?md5=be05af76da077b3722bfee389dbfd46a&pid=1-s2.0-S2949774424009671-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949774424009671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The goal of this article is to explore what online education and decision support tools are freely available to patients about prenatal screening.

Methods

We (1) conducted an environmental scan using Google Trends to identify and evaluate prenatal screening search terms, (2) created a list of websites and YouTube videos that would be easily accessed by a searcher, and (3) characterized the information within those websites and videos, including an examination of their qualities as a decision support tool and a readability analysis.

Results

Fifty websites, containing 62 unique educational resources, and 39 YouTube videos were analyzed. The websites were primarily educational, although the education was provided by a range of sources, including non-profit and for-profit organizations, universities, and governments (ie, public health departments). Readability scores of Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials for the sites ranged from 50% to 92%, with a median score of 74%. Two of the websites we evaluated met all of the limited decision support standards we applied; 4 of the websites included patient stories or experiences, and 8 included some element of values clarification. Videos were more likely to include values clarification.

Conclusion

The information available to patients online is variable. Although most is balanced and informative, much is difficult to read and missing key decision-making factors. Health care providers should work with patients to ensure they have basic comprehension of the prenatal genetic screening materials, possible result outcomes, and expected steps following a positive screening result.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非正式产前基因筛查教育:您能从谷歌和 YouTube 中学到什么?
方法我们(1)使用谷歌趋势(Google Trends)进行了一次环境扫描,以识别和评估产前筛查搜索词;(2)创建了一份便于搜索者访问的网站和 YouTube 视频列表;(3)对这些网站和视频中的信息进行了特征描述,包括对其作为决策支持工具的质量进行检查和可读性分析。结果分析了包含 62 个独特教育资源的 50 个网站和 39 个 YouTube 视频。这些网站主要是教育性的,但提供教育的来源多种多样,包括非营利性和营利性组织、大学和政府(即公共卫生部门)。可打印材料的患者教育材料评估工具对这些网站的可读性评分从 50% 到 92% 不等,中位数为 74%。在我们评估的网站中,有两个网站符合我们采用的所有有限决策支持标准;有 4 个网站包含患者故事或经历,有 8 个网站包含一些价值澄清元素。视频更有可能包含价值澄清。尽管大多数信息都是平衡的、翔实的,但也有很多信息难以阅读,缺少关键的决策因素。医疗服务提供者应与患者合作,确保他们基本了解产前基因筛查材料、可能的结果以及筛查结果呈阳性后的预期步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pilot implementation study of a default genetic referral process for patients with early-onset colorectal cancer Refining the interpretation of variants of uncertain significance in hereditary cancer screening through integrated RNA sequencing An evaluation of genetic predisposition to congenital anomalies and pediatric cancer supports KAT6B as a novel neuroblastoma susceptibility gene College of American Pathologists (CAP)/American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) proficiency testing for urinary glycosaminoglycan analysis: A summary of performance Genome sequencing enhances the diagnostic yield and expands the genetic landscape of male breast cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1