{"title":"The role of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis on success of type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty","authors":"Elif Ersoy Çallıoğlu , Kazım Bozdemir , Şadan Soyyiğit , Saliha Atalay , Bengi Arslan","doi":"10.1016/j.otorri.2023.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the role of allergic rhinitis (AR) and non-allergic rhinitis (NAR) on success of type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This prospective study was conducted on 60 patients who had type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty. The patients were divided into three groups as no-rhinitis (<em>n</em> = 28), NAR (<em>n</em> = 18) and AR (<em>n</em> = 14) groups, based on their symptoms, skin prick tests and/or serum specific IgE levels. AR and NAR groups were treated for their rhinitis symptoms both pre- and postoperatively. The patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months and compared for graft success rates and audiological outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three study groups were similar for age, gender distributions and preoperative air-bone gaps (<em>p</em> = 0.780, <em>p</em> = 0.167 and <em>p</em> = 0.676, respectively). Postoperative graft perforation rate was 0% in no-rhinitis and AR groups while it was 16.7% in NAR group, with a significant difference among three groups (<em>p</em> = 0.034). The comparison of three study groups for change in the postoperative air bone gaps in comparison with preoperative air bone gaps did not yield any statistically significant result (<em>p</em> = 0.729).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Although AR does not result in failure of type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty in patients treated for rhinitis compared to the control group, NAR does. Pre- and postoperative treatment of patients for rhinitis and employment of cartilage graft may be the key factors for success of surgery in patients with AR. Further studies with a larger sample size are needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7019,"journal":{"name":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","volume":"75 2","pages":"Pages 102-107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001651923001115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To investigate the role of allergic rhinitis (AR) and non-allergic rhinitis (NAR) on success of type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty.
Methods
This prospective study was conducted on 60 patients who had type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty. The patients were divided into three groups as no-rhinitis (n = 28), NAR (n = 18) and AR (n = 14) groups, based on their symptoms, skin prick tests and/or serum specific IgE levels. AR and NAR groups were treated for their rhinitis symptoms both pre- and postoperatively. The patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months and compared for graft success rates and audiological outcomes.
Results
Three study groups were similar for age, gender distributions and preoperative air-bone gaps (p = 0.780, p = 0.167 and p = 0.676, respectively). Postoperative graft perforation rate was 0% in no-rhinitis and AR groups while it was 16.7% in NAR group, with a significant difference among three groups (p = 0.034). The comparison of three study groups for change in the postoperative air bone gaps in comparison with preoperative air bone gaps did not yield any statistically significant result (p = 0.729).
Conclusion
Although AR does not result in failure of type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty in patients treated for rhinitis compared to the control group, NAR does. Pre- and postoperative treatment of patients for rhinitis and employment of cartilage graft may be the key factors for success of surgery in patients with AR. Further studies with a larger sample size are needed.
期刊介绍:
Es la revista más importante en español dedicada a la especialidad. Ofrece progresos científicos y técnicos tanto a nivel de originales como de casos clínicos. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Patología Cérvico-Facial y está presente en los más prestigiosos índices de referencia.