The role of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis on success of type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty

IF 0.9 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.otorri.2023.07.003
Elif Ersoy Çallıoğlu , Kazım Bozdemir , Şadan Soyyiğit , Saliha Atalay , Bengi Arslan
{"title":"The role of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis on success of type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty","authors":"Elif Ersoy Çallıoğlu ,&nbsp;Kazım Bozdemir ,&nbsp;Şadan Soyyiğit ,&nbsp;Saliha Atalay ,&nbsp;Bengi Arslan","doi":"10.1016/j.otorri.2023.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the role of allergic rhinitis (AR) and non-allergic rhinitis (NAR) on success of type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This prospective study was conducted on 60 patients who had type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty. The patients were divided into three groups as no-rhinitis (<em>n</em> = 28), NAR (<em>n</em> = 18) and AR (<em>n</em> = 14) groups, based on their symptoms, skin prick tests and/or serum specific IgE levels. AR and NAR groups were treated for their rhinitis symptoms both pre- and postoperatively. The patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months and compared for graft success rates and audiological outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three study groups were similar for age, gender distributions and preoperative air-bone gaps (<em>p</em> = 0.780, <em>p</em> = 0.167 and <em>p</em> = 0.676, respectively). Postoperative graft perforation rate was 0% in no-rhinitis and AR groups while it was 16.7% in NAR group, with a significant difference among three groups (<em>p</em> = 0.034). The comparison of three study groups for change in the postoperative air bone gaps in comparison with preoperative air bone gaps did not yield any statistically significant result (<em>p</em> = 0.729).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Although AR does not result in failure of type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty in patients treated for rhinitis compared to the control group, NAR does. Pre- and postoperative treatment of patients for rhinitis and employment of cartilage graft may be the key factors for success of surgery in patients with AR. Further studies with a larger sample size are needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7019,"journal":{"name":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","volume":"75 2","pages":"Pages 102-107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001651923001115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the role of allergic rhinitis (AR) and non-allergic rhinitis (NAR) on success of type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty.

Methods

This prospective study was conducted on 60 patients who had type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty. The patients were divided into three groups as no-rhinitis (n = 28), NAR (n = 18) and AR (n = 14) groups, based on their symptoms, skin prick tests and/or serum specific IgE levels. AR and NAR groups were treated for their rhinitis symptoms both pre- and postoperatively. The patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months and compared for graft success rates and audiological outcomes.

Results

Three study groups were similar for age, gender distributions and preoperative air-bone gaps (p = 0.780, p = 0.167 and p = 0.676, respectively). Postoperative graft perforation rate was 0% in no-rhinitis and AR groups while it was 16.7% in NAR group, with a significant difference among three groups (p = 0.034). The comparison of three study groups for change in the postoperative air bone gaps in comparison with preoperative air bone gaps did not yield any statistically significant result (p = 0.729).

Conclusion

Although AR does not result in failure of type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty in patients treated for rhinitis compared to the control group, NAR does. Pre- and postoperative treatment of patients for rhinitis and employment of cartilage graft may be the key factors for success of surgery in patients with AR. Further studies with a larger sample size are needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
过敏性和非过敏性鼻炎对 1 型软骨鼓室成形术成功率的影响
目的 探讨过敏性鼻炎(AR)和非过敏性鼻炎(NAR)对 1 型软骨鼓室成形术成功率的影响。 方法 对 60 名 1 型软骨鼓室成形术患者进行了前瞻性研究。根据患者的症状、皮肤点刺试验和/或血清特异性 IgE 水平,将患者分为三组,即无鼻炎组(28 人)、NAR 组(18 人)和 AR 组(14 人)。AR 组和 NAR 组在术前和术后均接受鼻炎症状治疗。结果三组患者的年龄、性别分布和术前气骨间隙相似(分别为 p = 0.780、p = 0.167 和 p = 0.676)。无鼻炎组和 AR 组术后移植物穿孔率为 0%,而 NAR 组为 16.7%,三组间差异显著(p = 0.034)。结论虽然与对照组相比,AR 不会导致鼻炎患者的 1 型软骨鼓室成形术失败,但 NAR 会。对鼻炎患者进行术前和术后治疗以及使用软骨移植可能是 AR 患者手术成功的关键因素。还需要进行样本量更大的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Es la revista más importante en español dedicada a la especialidad. Ofrece progresos científicos y técnicos tanto a nivel de originales como de casos clínicos. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Patología Cérvico-Facial y está presente en los más prestigiosos índices de referencia.
期刊最新文献
Retrolabyrinthine approach to the lateral skull base: The value of preoperative temporal bone CT analysis Situación actual de la tutoría en la formación especializada en otorrinolaringología en España. ¿Dónde estamos? ¿Hacia dónde queremos ir? Prevalencia de apnea obstructiva del sueño en pacientes obesos candidatos a cirugía bariátrica y cuestionarios predictores Recurrent peritonsillar abscess in adults: Incidence and risk factors in a prospective longitudinal cohort Enhancing the coverage and rotation of anterior ethmoidal artery flap for septal perforation closure: Insights from a flap design study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1