{"title":"Task demand modulates the effects of reward learning on emotional stimuli","authors":"Ning-Xuan Chen, Ping Wei","doi":"10.1007/s11571-024-10082-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The current study used event-related potentials (ERPs) to examine the ability of task demand in modulating the effect of reward association on the processing of emotional faces. In the learning phase, a high or low reward probability was paired with male or female facial photos of angry, happy, or neutral expressions. Then, in the test phase, task demand was manipulated by asking participants to discriminate the emotionality or the gender of the pre-learned face with no reward at stake. The ERP results in the test phase revealed that the fronto-central N1 (60–100 ms) and the VPP (160–210 ms) components were sensitive to the interaction between reward and emotion, in that the differences between the mean amplitudes for high- and low-reward conditions were significantly larger in the neutral face and angry face conditions than in the happy face condition. Moreover, reward association and task demand showed a significant interaction over the right hemisphere for the N170 component (140–180 ms), with amplitude difference between high- and low-reward conditions being larger in the emotion task than that in the gender task. The later N2pc component exhibited an interaction between task demand and emotionality, in that happy faces elicited larger N2pc difference waves than angry and neutral faces did in the emotion task, but neutral faces elicited larger N2pc difference waves than angry faces did in the gender task. The N2pc effect aligned with behavioral performance. These results suggest that reward association acts as an ‘emotional tagging’ to imbue neutral or angry faces with motivational significance at early time windows. Task demand functions in a top-down way to modulate the deployment of attentional resources at the later attentional selection stage, but does not affect the early automatic processing of either emotion or reward association.</p>","PeriodicalId":10500,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neurodynamics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neurodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-024-10082-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The current study used event-related potentials (ERPs) to examine the ability of task demand in modulating the effect of reward association on the processing of emotional faces. In the learning phase, a high or low reward probability was paired with male or female facial photos of angry, happy, or neutral expressions. Then, in the test phase, task demand was manipulated by asking participants to discriminate the emotionality or the gender of the pre-learned face with no reward at stake. The ERP results in the test phase revealed that the fronto-central N1 (60–100 ms) and the VPP (160–210 ms) components were sensitive to the interaction between reward and emotion, in that the differences between the mean amplitudes for high- and low-reward conditions were significantly larger in the neutral face and angry face conditions than in the happy face condition. Moreover, reward association and task demand showed a significant interaction over the right hemisphere for the N170 component (140–180 ms), with amplitude difference between high- and low-reward conditions being larger in the emotion task than that in the gender task. The later N2pc component exhibited an interaction between task demand and emotionality, in that happy faces elicited larger N2pc difference waves than angry and neutral faces did in the emotion task, but neutral faces elicited larger N2pc difference waves than angry faces did in the gender task. The N2pc effect aligned with behavioral performance. These results suggest that reward association acts as an ‘emotional tagging’ to imbue neutral or angry faces with motivational significance at early time windows. Task demand functions in a top-down way to modulate the deployment of attentional resources at the later attentional selection stage, but does not affect the early automatic processing of either emotion or reward association.
期刊介绍:
Cognitive Neurodynamics provides a unique forum of communication and cooperation for scientists and engineers working in the field of cognitive neurodynamics, intelligent science and applications, bridging the gap between theory and application, without any preference for pure theoretical, experimental or computational models.
The emphasis is to publish original models of cognitive neurodynamics, novel computational theories and experimental results. In particular, intelligent science inspired by cognitive neuroscience and neurodynamics is also very welcome.
The scope of Cognitive Neurodynamics covers cognitive neuroscience, neural computation based on dynamics, computer science, intelligent science as well as their interdisciplinary applications in the natural and engineering sciences. Papers that are appropriate for non-specialist readers are encouraged.
1. There is no page limit for manuscripts submitted to Cognitive Neurodynamics. Research papers should clearly represent an important advance of especially broad interest to researchers and technologists in neuroscience, biophysics, BCI, neural computer and intelligent robotics.
2. Cognitive Neurodynamics also welcomes brief communications: short papers reporting results that are of genuinely broad interest but that for one reason and another do not make a sufficiently complete story to justify a full article publication. Brief Communications should consist of approximately four manuscript pages.
3. Cognitive Neurodynamics publishes review articles in which a specific field is reviewed through an exhaustive literature survey. There are no restrictions on the number of pages. Review articles are usually invited, but submitted reviews will also be considered.