Predictive factors for decompensating events in patients with cirrhosis with primary biliary cholangitis under different lines of therapy.

IF 12.9 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Hepatology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1097/HEP.0000000000000826
Javier Ampuero, Ana Lucena, Marina Berenguer, Manuel Hernández-Guerra, Esther Molina, Judith Gómez-Camarero, Carlos Valdivia, Elena Gómez, Marta Casado, Carmen Álvarez-Navascuez, Francisco Jorquera, Luisa García-Buey, Álvaro Díaz-González, Rosa Morillas, Montserrat García-Retortillo, Jose M Sousa, Indhira Pérez-Medrano, Miguel Á Simón, Javier Martínez, Juan Arenas, María Carlota Londoño, Antonio Olveira, Conrado Fernández-Rodríguez
{"title":"Predictive factors for decompensating events in patients with cirrhosis with primary biliary cholangitis under different lines of therapy.","authors":"Javier Ampuero, Ana Lucena, Marina Berenguer, Manuel Hernández-Guerra, Esther Molina, Judith Gómez-Camarero, Carlos Valdivia, Elena Gómez, Marta Casado, Carmen Álvarez-Navascuez, Francisco Jorquera, Luisa García-Buey, Álvaro Díaz-González, Rosa Morillas, Montserrat García-Retortillo, Jose M Sousa, Indhira Pérez-Medrano, Miguel Á Simón, Javier Martínez, Juan Arenas, María Carlota Londoño, Antonio Olveira, Conrado Fernández-Rodríguez","doi":"10.1097/HEP.0000000000000826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The landscape in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) has changed with the advent of second-line treatments. However, the use of obeticholic acid (OCA) and fibrates in PBC-related cirrhosis is challenging. We assessed the impact of receiving a second-line therapy as a risk factor for decompensated cirrhosis in a real-world population with cirrhosis and PBC, and identify the predictive factors for decompensated cirrhosis in these patients.</p><p><strong>Approach and results: </strong>Multicenter study enrolling 388 patients with PBC-cirrhosis from the Spanish ColHai registry. Biopsy (20%), ultrasound (59%), or transient elastography (21%) defined cirrhosis, and the presence of varices and splenomegaly defined clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). Paris-II and PBC OCA international study of efficacy criteria determined the response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), fibrates (n=93), and OCA (n=104). The incidence of decompensated cirrhosis decreased for UDCA versus OCA or fibrates in the real-world population, but they were similar considering the propensity score-matched cohort (UDCA 3.77 vs. second-line therapy 4.5 100 persons-year, respectively), as patients on second-line therapy exhibited advanced liver disease. Consequently, GGT, albumin, platelets, clinically significant portal hypertension, and UDCA response were associated with a decompensating event. OCA response (achieved in 52% of patients) was associated with bilirubin (OR 0.21 [95% CI: 0.06-0.73]) and AST (OR 0.97 [95% CI: 0.95-0.99]), while fibrate response (achieved in 55% of patients) with AST [OR 0.96 (95% CI: 0.95-0.98]). In patients treated with OCA, drug response (sHR 0.23 [95% CI: 0.08-0.64]), diabetes (sHR 5.62 [95% CI: 2.02-15.68]), albumin (sHR 0.34 [95% CI: 0.13-0.89]), and platelets (sHR 0.99 [95% CI: 0.98-1.00]) were related to decompensation. In patients treated with fibrate, drug response (sHR 0.36 (95% CI: 0.14-0.95]), albumin (sHR 0.36 (95% CI: 0.16-0.81]), and clinically significant portal hypertension (sHR 3.70 (95% CI: 1.17-11.70]) were associated with decompensated cirrhosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Advanced PBC, rather than OCA and fibrates, was found to be associated with decompensating events. Therefore, biochemical and clinical variables should be considered when making decisions about the management of these drugs. Moreover, a positive response to OCA and fibrates reduced the risk of decompensation.</p>","PeriodicalId":177,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HEP.0000000000000826","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: The landscape in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) has changed with the advent of second-line treatments. However, the use of obeticholic acid (OCA) and fibrates in PBC-related cirrhosis is challenging. We assessed the impact of receiving a second-line therapy as a risk factor for decompensated cirrhosis in a real-world population with cirrhosis and PBC, and identify the predictive factors for decompensated cirrhosis in these patients.

Approach and results: Multicenter study enrolling 388 patients with PBC-cirrhosis from the Spanish ColHai registry. Biopsy (20%), ultrasound (59%), or transient elastography (21%) defined cirrhosis, and the presence of varices and splenomegaly defined clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). Paris-II and PBC OCA international study of efficacy criteria determined the response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), fibrates (n=93), and OCA (n=104). The incidence of decompensated cirrhosis decreased for UDCA versus OCA or fibrates in the real-world population, but they were similar considering the propensity score-matched cohort (UDCA 3.77 vs. second-line therapy 4.5 100 persons-year, respectively), as patients on second-line therapy exhibited advanced liver disease. Consequently, GGT, albumin, platelets, clinically significant portal hypertension, and UDCA response were associated with a decompensating event. OCA response (achieved in 52% of patients) was associated with bilirubin (OR 0.21 [95% CI: 0.06-0.73]) and AST (OR 0.97 [95% CI: 0.95-0.99]), while fibrate response (achieved in 55% of patients) with AST [OR 0.96 (95% CI: 0.95-0.98]). In patients treated with OCA, drug response (sHR 0.23 [95% CI: 0.08-0.64]), diabetes (sHR 5.62 [95% CI: 2.02-15.68]), albumin (sHR 0.34 [95% CI: 0.13-0.89]), and platelets (sHR 0.99 [95% CI: 0.98-1.00]) were related to decompensation. In patients treated with fibrate, drug response (sHR 0.36 (95% CI: 0.14-0.95]), albumin (sHR 0.36 (95% CI: 0.16-0.81]), and clinically significant portal hypertension (sHR 3.70 (95% CI: 1.17-11.70]) were associated with decompensated cirrhosis.

Conclusions: Advanced PBC, rather than OCA and fibrates, was found to be associated with decompensating events. Therefore, biochemical and clinical variables should be considered when making decisions about the management of these drugs. Moreover, a positive response to OCA and fibrates reduced the risk of decompensation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同疗法下原发性胆汁性胆管炎肝硬化患者失代偿事件的预测因素。
背景目的:随着二线治疗方法的出现,原发性胆汁性胆管炎(PBC)的治疗形势发生了变化。然而,在 PBC 相关肝硬化中使用奥贝胆酸(OCA)和纤维酸盐具有挑战性。我们在真实世界的肝硬化 PBC 患者中评估了接受二线治疗作为失代偿性肝硬化风险因素的影响,并确定了这些患者失代偿性肝硬化的预测因素:多中心研究:从西班牙 ColHai 登记处招募了 388 名 PBC 肝硬化患者。活组织检查(20%)、超声检查(59%)或瞬时弹性成像(21%)确定了肝硬化,静脉曲张和脾肿大确定了临床意义门脉高压(CSPH)。巴黎-II和POISE标准决定了对熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)、纤维素类(93人)和OCA(104人)的反应。在真实世界人群中,UDCA 与 OCA 或纤维酸盐相比,失代偿性肝硬化的发生率有所下降,但考虑到 PS 匹配队列(UDCA 3.77 对二线疗法 4.5 100 人/年),两者的发生率相似,因为接受二线疗法的患者表现为晚期肝病。因此,GGT、白蛋白、血小板、CSPH 和 UDCA 反应与失代偿事件有关。OCA反应(52%的患者)与胆红素[OR 0.21 (95%CI 0.06-0.73)]和谷草转氨酶[OR 0.97 (95%CI 0.95-0.99)]相关,而纤维酸盐反应(55%的患者)与谷草转氨酶[OR 0.96 (95%CI 0.95-0.98)]相关。在 OCA 治疗的患者中,药物反应[sHR 0.23 (95%CI 0.08-0.64)]、糖尿病[sHR 5.62 (95%CI 2.02-15.68)]、白蛋白[sHR 0.34 (95%CI 0.13-0.89)]和血小板[sHR 0.99 (95%CI 0.98-1.00)]与失代偿有关。在纤维治疗患者中,药物反应[sHR 0.36 (95%CI 0.14-0.95)]、白蛋白[sHR 0.36 (95%CI 0.16-0.81)]和CSPH[sHR 3.70 (95%CI 1.17-11.70)]与失代偿性肝硬化相关:结论:研究发现,与失代偿事件相关的是晚期 PBC,而非 OCA 和纤维素类药物。因此,在决定使用这些药物时应考虑生化和临床变量。此外,对OCA和纤维素类药物的积极反应可降低失代偿的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hepatology
Hepatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
27.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
609
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: HEPATOLOGY is recognized as the leading publication in the field of liver disease. It features original, peer-reviewed articles covering various aspects of liver structure, function, and disease. The journal's distinguished Editorial Board carefully selects the best articles each month, focusing on topics including immunology, chronic hepatitis, viral hepatitis, cirrhosis, genetic and metabolic liver diseases, liver cancer, and drug metabolism.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of hepatitis C virus hypervariable region 1 insertions and their role in antibody evasion Evaluating the positive predictive value of code-based identification of cirrhosis and its complications utilizing GPT-4 Drug treatments to prevent first decompensation in cirrhosis New ubiquitomic subtypes in hepatocellular carcinoma: Insights for future therapeutic approaches Role of microbiome in autoimmune liver diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1