Noninvasive Assessment of Intracranial Pressure: Deformability Index as an Adjunct to Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter to Increase Diagnostic Ability.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurocritical Care Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1007/s12028-024-01955-x
Dag Ferner Netteland, Mads Aarhus, Else Charlotte Sandset, Llewellyn Padayachy, Eirik Helseth, Reidar Brekken
{"title":"Noninvasive Assessment of Intracranial Pressure: Deformability Index as an Adjunct to Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter to Increase Diagnostic Ability.","authors":"Dag Ferner Netteland, Mads Aarhus, Else Charlotte Sandset, Llewellyn Padayachy, Eirik Helseth, Reidar Brekken","doi":"10.1007/s12028-024-01955-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Today, invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) measurement remains the standard, but its invasiveness limits availability. Here, we evaluate a novel ultrasound-based optic nerve sheath parameter called the deformability index (DI) and its ability to assess ICP noninvasively. Furthermore, we ask whether combining DI with optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), a more established parameter, results in increased diagnostic ability, as compared to using ONSD alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively included adult patients with traumatic brain injury with invasive ICP monitoring, which served as the reference measurement. Ultrasound images and videos of the optic nerve sheath were acquired. ONSD was measured at the bedside, whereas DI was calculated by semiautomated postprocessing of ultrasound videos. Correlations of ONSD and DI to ICP were explored, and a linear regression model combining ONSD and DI was compared to a linear regression model using ONSD alone. Ability of the noninvasive parameters to distinguish dichotomized ICP was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves, and a logistic regression model combining ONSD and DI was compared to a logistic regression model using ONSD alone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four ultrasound examinations were performed in 26 patients. Both DI (R =  - 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] R <  - 0.03; p = 0.03) and ONSD (R = 0.45; 95% CI R > 0.23; p < 0.01) correlated with ICP. When including both parameters in a combined model, the estimated correlation coefficient increased (R = 0.51; 95% CI R > 0.30; p < 0.01), compared to using ONSD alone, but the model improvement did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.09). Both DI (area under the curve [AUC] 0.69, 95% CI 0.53-0.83) and ONSD (AUC 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.86) displayed ability to distinguish ICP dichotomized at ICP ≥ 15 mm Hg. When using both parameters in a combined model, AUC increased (0.80, 95% CI 0.63-0.90), and the model improvement was statistically significant (p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combining ONSD with DI holds the potential of increasing the ability of optic nerve sheath parameters in the noninvasive assessment of ICP, compared to using ONSD alone, and further study of DI is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377659/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-01955-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Today, invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) measurement remains the standard, but its invasiveness limits availability. Here, we evaluate a novel ultrasound-based optic nerve sheath parameter called the deformability index (DI) and its ability to assess ICP noninvasively. Furthermore, we ask whether combining DI with optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), a more established parameter, results in increased diagnostic ability, as compared to using ONSD alone.

Methods: We prospectively included adult patients with traumatic brain injury with invasive ICP monitoring, which served as the reference measurement. Ultrasound images and videos of the optic nerve sheath were acquired. ONSD was measured at the bedside, whereas DI was calculated by semiautomated postprocessing of ultrasound videos. Correlations of ONSD and DI to ICP were explored, and a linear regression model combining ONSD and DI was compared to a linear regression model using ONSD alone. Ability of the noninvasive parameters to distinguish dichotomized ICP was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves, and a logistic regression model combining ONSD and DI was compared to a logistic regression model using ONSD alone.

Results: Forty-four ultrasound examinations were performed in 26 patients. Both DI (R =  - 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] R <  - 0.03; p = 0.03) and ONSD (R = 0.45; 95% CI R > 0.23; p < 0.01) correlated with ICP. When including both parameters in a combined model, the estimated correlation coefficient increased (R = 0.51; 95% CI R > 0.30; p < 0.01), compared to using ONSD alone, but the model improvement did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.09). Both DI (area under the curve [AUC] 0.69, 95% CI 0.53-0.83) and ONSD (AUC 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.86) displayed ability to distinguish ICP dichotomized at ICP ≥ 15 mm Hg. When using both parameters in a combined model, AUC increased (0.80, 95% CI 0.63-0.90), and the model improvement was statistically significant (p = 0.02).

Conclusions: Combining ONSD with DI holds the potential of increasing the ability of optic nerve sheath parameters in the noninvasive assessment of ICP, compared to using ONSD alone, and further study of DI is warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颅内压的无创评估:变形指数作为视神经鞘直径的辅助手段,提高诊断能力。
背景:目前,有创颅内压(ICP)测量仍是标准测量方法,但其有创性限制了其可用性。在此,我们评估了一种基于超声的新型视神经鞘参数--变形指数(DI)及其无创评估 ICP 的能力。此外,我们还询问将 DI 与视神经鞘直径(ONSD)这一更成熟的参数相结合是否会提高诊断能力,而不是单独使用ONSD:我们前瞻性地纳入了接受有创 ICP 监测的成年脑外伤患者,并将其作为参考测量值。我们采集了视神经鞘的超声图像和视频。床旁测量 ONSD,而 DI 则通过对超声视频进行半自动后处理来计算。研究人员探讨了 ONSD 和 DI 与 ICP 的相关性,并将 ONSD 和 DI 的线性回归模型与仅使用 ONSD 的线性回归模型进行了比较。使用接收器操作特征曲线评估了无创参数区分二分法 ICP 的能力,并将 ONSD 和 DI 的逻辑回归模型与仅使用 ONSD 的逻辑回归模型进行了比较:结果:26 名患者接受了 44 次超声检查。结果:对 26 名患者进行了 44 次超声检查:与单独使用ONSD相比,将ONSD与DI相结合有可能提高视神经鞘参数在ICP无创评估中的能力,因此有必要对DI进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of External Ventricular Drains and Intraparenchymal Pressure Monitors for Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Correction: Risk Factors for Cerebral Vasospasm After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies. Looking Back at the Lance-Adams Syndrome: Uncommon and Unalike. Variations in Autoregulation-Based Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Determination Using Two Integrated Neuromonitoring Platforms in a Trauma Patient. Association Between Early Mobilization and Functional Outcomes in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Multicenter Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1