Microbial Biofungicides as a Substitute for Chemical Fungicides in the Control of Phytopathogens: Current Perspectives and Research Directions.

IF 2.3 Q2 BIOLOGY Scientifica Pub Date : 2024-02-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/5322696
Lamenew Fenta, Habtamu Mekonnen
{"title":"Microbial Biofungicides as a Substitute for Chemical Fungicides in the Control of Phytopathogens: Current Perspectives and Research Directions.","authors":"Lamenew Fenta, Habtamu Mekonnen","doi":"10.1155/2024/5322696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>These days, two important issues are causing concern in the global community: the alarmingly growing trend of the human population and the issue of food security. To this end, people around the world have been searching for solutions that could feed the needy in a sustainable way. In response to this urgent call, scientists from around the world started working on increasing crop production and productivity by controlling crop pathogens that could harm the productivity of crops. Synthetic fungicides have been in use for controlling crop diseases for several decades, but later, due to the evidenced side effects of the fungicides, there have been attempts to shift towards a less cost-effective and eco-friendly method of controlling crop diseases, and so far, many remarkable results have been achieved. However, due to the less effective and shorter shelf life of microbial biofungicides, as well as the less accessibility of these microbial biofungicides to growers around the world, it became difficult to remove the fungicides totally from the market. To minimize this problem, researchers suggested an integrated approach: the combination of microbial biofungicides with a reduced dose of synthetic fungicides. Hence, this review explored the status as well as the merits and demerits of microbial biofungicides as compared to synthetic fungicides.</p>","PeriodicalId":21726,"journal":{"name":"Scientifica","volume":"2024 ","pages":"5322696"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10917481/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientifica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5322696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

These days, two important issues are causing concern in the global community: the alarmingly growing trend of the human population and the issue of food security. To this end, people around the world have been searching for solutions that could feed the needy in a sustainable way. In response to this urgent call, scientists from around the world started working on increasing crop production and productivity by controlling crop pathogens that could harm the productivity of crops. Synthetic fungicides have been in use for controlling crop diseases for several decades, but later, due to the evidenced side effects of the fungicides, there have been attempts to shift towards a less cost-effective and eco-friendly method of controlling crop diseases, and so far, many remarkable results have been achieved. However, due to the less effective and shorter shelf life of microbial biofungicides, as well as the less accessibility of these microbial biofungicides to growers around the world, it became difficult to remove the fungicides totally from the market. To minimize this problem, researchers suggested an integrated approach: the combination of microbial biofungicides with a reduced dose of synthetic fungicides. Hence, this review explored the status as well as the merits and demerits of microbial biofungicides as compared to synthetic fungicides.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微生物生物杀真菌剂作为化学杀真菌剂的替代品控制植物病原体:当前视角与研究方向》。
如今,有两个重要问题引起了国际社会的关注:一是令人担忧的人口增长趋势,二是粮食安全问题。为此,世界各地的人们一直在寻找能够以可持续的方式养活穷人的解决方案。为了响应这一迫切呼声,世界各地的科学家开始致力于通过控制可能损害作物产量的作物病原体来提高作物产量和生产率。几十年来,合成杀菌剂一直被用于控制作物病害,但后来,由于杀菌剂的副作用已得到证实,人们开始尝试转向成本效益较低且环保的作物病害控制方法,迄今为止,已取得了许多显著成果。然而,由于微生物生物杀真菌剂的效果较差、保质期较短,而且世界各地的种植者较难获得这些微生物生物杀真菌剂,因此很难将杀真菌剂完全清除出市场。为了尽量减少这一问题,研究人员提出了一种综合方法:将微生物生物杀真菌剂与减少剂量的合成杀真菌剂相结合。因此,本综述探讨了微生物生物杀菌剂与合成杀菌剂相比的现状和优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scientifica
Scientifica BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Scientifica is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes research articles, review articles, and clinical studies covering a wide range of subjects in the life sciences, environmental sciences, health sciences, and medicine. The journal is divided into the 65 subject areas.
期刊最新文献
Ethnopharmacological Perspective for Treatment of Epilepsy: An Updated Review. Assessment of Soil Carbon Stock and Soil Quality in Different Forest Stands and Management Regimes in Terai Region of Nepal. Key Proteins for Regeneration in A. mexicanum: Transcriptomic Insights From Aged and Juvenile Limbs. Evaluating the Toxicity Induced by Bisphenol F in Labeo rohita Fish Using Multiple Biomarker Approach. Typology of Tomato Cropping Systems and Determinants of Preharvest Losses in Western Cameroon.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1