Disparities in Patient-reported Outcome Measure Completion Rates and Baseline Function in Newly Presenting Spine Patients.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine Pub Date : 2024-11-15 Epub Date: 2024-03-07 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000004977
Andrea H Johnson, Jane C Brennan, Parimal Rana, Justin J Turcotte, Chad Patton
{"title":"Disparities in Patient-reported Outcome Measure Completion Rates and Baseline Function in Newly Presenting Spine Patients.","authors":"Andrea H Johnson, Jane C Brennan, Parimal Rana, Justin J Turcotte, Chad Patton","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000004977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate disparities in patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) completion rates and baseline function scores among newly presenting spine patients.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Prior studies have demonstrated that minority patients and those of low socioeconomic status may present with worse physical and mental health on PROMs. As PROMs are increasingly used in clinical care, research, and health policy, accurate assessment of health status among populations relies on the successful completion of PROM instruments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 10,803 consecutive new patients presenting to a single multidisciplinary spine clinic from June 2020 to September 2022 was performed. Univariate statistics were performed to compare demographics between patients who did and did not complete PROMs. Multivariable analysis was used to compare PROM instrument completion rates by race, ethnicity, and Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and baseline scores among responders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 68.4% of patients completed PROMs at the first clinic visit. After adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, and diagnosis type, patients of non-White race (OR=0.661, 95% CI=0.599-0.729, P <0.001), Hispanic ethnicity (OR=0.569, 95% CI=0.448-0.721, P <0.001), and increased social vulnerability (OR=0.608, 95% CI=0.511-0.723, P <0.001) were less likely to complete PROMs. In the multivariable models, patients of non-White race reported lower levels of physical function (β=-6.5, 95% CI=-12.4 to -0.6, P =0.032) and higher levels of pain intensity (β=0.6, 95% CI=0.2-1.0, P =0.005). Hispanic ethnicity (β=1.5, 95% CI=0.5-2.5, P =0.004) and increased social vulnerability (β=1.1, 95% CI=0.4-1.8, P =0.002) were each associated with increased pain intensity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among newly presenting spine patients, those of non-White race, Hispanic ethnicity, and with increased social vulnerability were less likely to complete PROMs. As these subpopulations also reported worse physical function or pain intensity, additional strategies are needed to better capture patient-reported health status to avoid bias in clinical care, outcomes research, and health policy.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>4.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1591-1597"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004977","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective review.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate disparities in patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) completion rates and baseline function scores among newly presenting spine patients.

Summary of background data: Prior studies have demonstrated that minority patients and those of low socioeconomic status may present with worse physical and mental health on PROMs. As PROMs are increasingly used in clinical care, research, and health policy, accurate assessment of health status among populations relies on the successful completion of PROM instruments.

Methods: A retrospective review of 10,803 consecutive new patients presenting to a single multidisciplinary spine clinic from June 2020 to September 2022 was performed. Univariate statistics were performed to compare demographics between patients who did and did not complete PROMs. Multivariable analysis was used to compare PROM instrument completion rates by race, ethnicity, and Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and baseline scores among responders.

Results: A total of 68.4% of patients completed PROMs at the first clinic visit. After adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, and diagnosis type, patients of non-White race (OR=0.661, 95% CI=0.599-0.729, P <0.001), Hispanic ethnicity (OR=0.569, 95% CI=0.448-0.721, P <0.001), and increased social vulnerability (OR=0.608, 95% CI=0.511-0.723, P <0.001) were less likely to complete PROMs. In the multivariable models, patients of non-White race reported lower levels of physical function (β=-6.5, 95% CI=-12.4 to -0.6, P =0.032) and higher levels of pain intensity (β=0.6, 95% CI=0.2-1.0, P =0.005). Hispanic ethnicity (β=1.5, 95% CI=0.5-2.5, P =0.004) and increased social vulnerability (β=1.1, 95% CI=0.4-1.8, P =0.002) were each associated with increased pain intensity.

Conclusions: Among newly presenting spine patients, those of non-White race, Hispanic ethnicity, and with increased social vulnerability were less likely to complete PROMs. As these subpopulations also reported worse physical function or pain intensity, additional strategies are needed to better capture patient-reported health status to avoid bias in clinical care, outcomes research, and health policy.

Level of evidence: 4.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新发脊柱疾病患者的患者报告结果测量完成率和基线功能差异。
研究设计回顾性研究:本研究的目的是评估新近就诊的脊柱疾病患者在患者报告结果测量(PROM)完成率和基线功能评分方面的差异:先前的研究表明,少数民族患者和社会经济地位较低的患者在 PROMs 中的身心健康状况可能较差。随着 PROMs 在临床护理、研究和健康政策中的应用越来越广泛,对不同人群健康状况的准确评估有赖于 PROM 工具的顺利完成:方法:我们对 2020 年 6 月至 2022 年 9 月在一家多学科脊柱诊所就诊的 10803 名连续新患者进行了回顾性分析。通过单变量统计来比较完成和未完成 PROMs 的患者的人口统计学特征。多变量分析用于比较不同种族、民族、社会脆弱性指数 (SVI) 和应答者基线分数的 PROM 工具完成率:68.4%的患者在首次就诊时完成了 PROM。在对年龄、性别、体重指数和诊断类型进行调整后,非白人患者(OR=0.661,95%-CI=0.599-0.729,PC结论:在新就诊的脊柱疾病患者中,非白人患者的社会脆弱性指数(SVI)和基线分数较高:在新就诊的脊柱病患中,非白种人、西班牙裔和社会弱势人群不太可能完成 PROMs。由于这些亚群也报告了较差的身体功能或疼痛强度,因此需要更多的策略来更好地捕捉患者报告的健康状况,以避免在临床护理、结果研究和健康政策中出现偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
Temporal Trends of Improvement After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Intraoperative Hypotension Is an Important Modifiable Risk Factor for Major Complications in Spinal Fusion Surgery. Clinical Outcome of Lumbar Hybrid Surgery in a Consecutive Series of Patients With Long-term Follow-up. Does Paraspinal Muscle Mass Predict Lumbar Lordosis Before and After Decompression for Degenerative Spinal Stenosis? The Utility of the Surgical Apgar Score in Assessing the Risk of Perioperative Complications Following Spinal Fusion Surgery for Pediatric Patients With Scoliosis and Cerebral Palsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1