Pain coping and catastrophizing in youth with and without cerebral palsy.

IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Scandinavian Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-03-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1515/sjpain-2023-0062
Michael N Vinkel, Gija Rackauskaite, John R Østergaard, Nanna B Finnerup, Mark P Jensen
{"title":"Pain coping and catastrophizing in youth with and without cerebral palsy.","authors":"Michael N Vinkel, Gija Rackauskaite, John R Østergaard, Nanna B Finnerup, Mark P Jensen","doi":"10.1515/sjpain-2023-0062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to compare the use of pain coping strategies and pain catastrophizing in youth with and without cerebral palsy (CP), and to examine how these two groups differ with respect to the associations between pain coping, catastrophizing, and measures of psychological function and sleep disturbance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-seven individuals with CP and 49 healthy controls aged 15-22 were included in this cross-sectional observational study. Pain was assessed using a semi-structured interviews and participants completed measures of pain coping, pain catastrophizing, psychological function, and sleep.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Youth with CP used information seeking and problem solving (<i>p</i> = 0.003, Cohen's <i>d</i> (<i>d</i>) = -0.80) and sought social support (<i>p</i> = 0.044, <i>d</i> = -0.51) less often, and used internalizing as a coping strategy more often (<i>p</i> = 0.045, <i>d</i> = 0.59) than healthy controls. The use of information seeking and problem solving correlated more strongly with measures of depression (<i>p</i> = 0.023, Cohen's <i>f</i> (<i>f</i>) <i>=</i> 0.08) and sleep disturbance (<i>p</i> = 0.022, <i>f =</i> 0.08), while behavioral distraction correlated more strongly with measures of anxiety (<i>p</i> = 0.006, <i>f =</i> 0.11) and sleep disturbance (<i>p</i> = 0.017, <i>f =</i> 0.09) in youth with CP, compared to healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study findings raise the possibility that youth with CP may benefit more in terms of psychological function and sleep quality from coping training interventions that focus on behavioral distraction, information seeking, and problem solving. Research to test these ideas in additional samples of youth with CP is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":47407,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2023-0062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the use of pain coping strategies and pain catastrophizing in youth with and without cerebral palsy (CP), and to examine how these two groups differ with respect to the associations between pain coping, catastrophizing, and measures of psychological function and sleep disturbance.

Methods: Twenty-seven individuals with CP and 49 healthy controls aged 15-22 were included in this cross-sectional observational study. Pain was assessed using a semi-structured interviews and participants completed measures of pain coping, pain catastrophizing, psychological function, and sleep.

Results: Youth with CP used information seeking and problem solving (p = 0.003, Cohen's d (d) = -0.80) and sought social support (p = 0.044, d = -0.51) less often, and used internalizing as a coping strategy more often (p = 0.045, d = 0.59) than healthy controls. The use of information seeking and problem solving correlated more strongly with measures of depression (p = 0.023, Cohen's f (f) = 0.08) and sleep disturbance (p = 0.022, f = 0.08), while behavioral distraction correlated more strongly with measures of anxiety (p = 0.006, f = 0.11) and sleep disturbance (p = 0.017, f = 0.09) in youth with CP, compared to healthy controls.

Conclusions: The study findings raise the possibility that youth with CP may benefit more in terms of psychological function and sleep quality from coping training interventions that focus on behavioral distraction, information seeking, and problem solving. Research to test these ideas in additional samples of youth with CP is warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有脑瘫和无脑瘫青少年的疼痛应对和灾难化。
研究目的本研究旨在比较患有和未患有脑性瘫痪(CP)的青少年在疼痛应对策略和疼痛灾难化方面的使用情况,并探讨这两个群体在疼痛应对、灾难化、心理功能测量和睡眠障碍之间的关联方面有何不同:这项横断面观察研究共纳入了 27 名 15-22 岁的 CP 患者和 49 名健康对照者。通过半结构化访谈对疼痛进行了评估,参与者完成了疼痛应对、疼痛灾难化、心理功能和睡眠的测量:结果:与健康对照组相比,患有慢性阻塞性肺病的青少年更少使用寻求信息和解决问题的方法(p = 0.003,Cohen's d (d) = -0.80),更少寻求社会支持(p = 0.044,d = -0.51),更多使用内化作为应对策略(p = 0.045,d = 0.59)。与健康对照组相比,CP 青少年寻求信息和解决问题与抑郁(p = 0.023,Cohen's f = 0.08)和睡眠障碍(p = 0.022,f = 0.08)的相关性更强,而行为分散与焦虑(p = 0.006,f = 0.11)和睡眠障碍(p = 0.017,f = 0.09)的相关性更强:研究结果表明,CP 青少年可能会在心理功能和睡眠质量方面从侧重于行为分散、信息搜寻和问题解决的应对训练干预中获益更多。有必要在更多的脊髓灰质炎青少年样本中进行研究,以验证这些观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Pain
Scandinavian Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
73
期刊最新文献
Neck and shoulder pain and inflammatory biomarkers in plasma among forklift truck operators - A case-control study. A positive scratch collapse test in anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome indicates its neuropathic character. Real-world evidence evaluation on consumer experience and prescription journey of diclofenac gel in Sweden. Differences in risk factors for flare-ups in patients with lumbar radicular pain may depend on the definition of flare. The "future" pain clinician: Competencies needed to provide psychologically informed care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1