Outcomes of complex burn injury patients managed at two primary and one tertiary level burns facilities in the Western Cape province of South Africa - a retrospective review.

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY South African Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-25 DOI:10.36303/SAJS.4061
S W Carolissen, W Kleintjes, F Gool, S Gilbert
{"title":"Outcomes of complex burn injury patients managed at two primary and one tertiary level burns facilities in the Western Cape province of South Africa - a retrospective review.","authors":"S W Carolissen, W Kleintjes, F Gool, S Gilbert","doi":"10.36303/SAJS.4061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to compare factors contributing to a positive outcome of adult burn injury patients managed at two primary and one tertiary level Western Cape hospitals. These patients from the primary hospitals (PLHs) met the referral criteria for specialised care at the Tygerberg Hospital burns unit (TBU) but were not accepted or were accepted late.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1034 adult burn injury patients seen at two primary level (\"A\" and \"B\") hospitals and the TBU between 2016 and 2019 were retrospectively analysed. One hundred and eleven (111) primary level patients (\"A\" 71, \"B\" 40) met the criteria for referral to the TBU. The outcomes and factors contributing to positive outcome of these patients were compared with the 859 patients treated at the TBU during the same period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients treated at the TBU showed longer theatre waiting times, more operations, and higher complication and death rates than their primary level counterparts. The PLHs showed no factors significantly contributing to hospital discharge. At TBU, pregnancy status, younger age, hot water burns, lower abbreviated burns severity index (ABSI) score, and longer time to theatre were associated with hospital discharge. A shortage of beds was the main reason for denial of admission to the TBU.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PLHs showed good outcomes in managing severe burn injuries, although no significant contributors to a positive outcome were identified. Patient- and facility-related factors contributed to positive outcomes at the TBU. Upgrading both the Western Cape's primary level capabilities and the TBU's accessibility and efficiency are necessary to improve burns services.</p>","PeriodicalId":51161,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36303/SAJS.4061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to compare factors contributing to a positive outcome of adult burn injury patients managed at two primary and one tertiary level Western Cape hospitals. These patients from the primary hospitals (PLHs) met the referral criteria for specialised care at the Tygerberg Hospital burns unit (TBU) but were not accepted or were accepted late.

Methods: A total of 1034 adult burn injury patients seen at two primary level ("A" and "B") hospitals and the TBU between 2016 and 2019 were retrospectively analysed. One hundred and eleven (111) primary level patients ("A" 71, "B" 40) met the criteria for referral to the TBU. The outcomes and factors contributing to positive outcome of these patients were compared with the 859 patients treated at the TBU during the same period.

Results: Patients treated at the TBU showed longer theatre waiting times, more operations, and higher complication and death rates than their primary level counterparts. The PLHs showed no factors significantly contributing to hospital discharge. At TBU, pregnancy status, younger age, hot water burns, lower abbreviated burns severity index (ABSI) score, and longer time to theatre were associated with hospital discharge. A shortage of beds was the main reason for denial of admission to the TBU.

Conclusion: The PLHs showed good outcomes in managing severe burn injuries, although no significant contributors to a positive outcome were identified. Patient- and facility-related factors contributed to positive outcomes at the TBU. Upgrading both the Western Cape's primary level capabilities and the TBU's accessibility and efficiency are necessary to improve burns services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非西开普省两家一级烧伤医疗机构和一家三级烧伤医疗机构收治的复杂烧伤患者的治疗效果--回顾性分析。
背景:本研究旨在比较在西开普省两家一级医院和一家三级医院接受治疗的成年烧伤患者获得积极治疗结果的因素。这些来自初级医院(PLHs)的患者符合转诊标准,可到泰格贝格医院烧伤科(TBU)接受专业治疗,但未被接受或接受较晚:对2016年至2019年期间在两家一级医院("A "级和 "B "级)和泰格贝格医院烧伤科就诊的1034名成年烧伤患者进行了回顾性分析。111名基层患者("A "级71人,"B "级40人)符合转诊至特需病房的标准。研究人员将这些患者的疗效和导致积极疗效的因素与同期在特变电工室接受治疗的 859 名患者进行了比较:结果:与基层医院相比,在特需病房接受治疗的患者等待时间更长,手术次数更多,并发症和死亡率更高。公共卫生人员的出院率没有明显的影响因素。在TBU,怀孕状态、年龄较小、热水烫伤、较低的烧伤严重程度指数(ABSI)和较长的手术室等候时间与出院有关。床位不足是拒绝入住特需病房的主要原因:结论:尽管没有发现导致积极结果的重要因素,但公共卫生医院在处理严重烧伤方面取得了良好的结果。与患者和医疗设施相关的因素有助于提高特需病房的治疗效果。要改善烧伤服务,就必须提升西开普省的初级医疗能力以及特需医疗单位的可及性和效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Surgery (SAJS) is a quarterly, general surgical journal. It carries research articles and letters, editorials, clinical practice and other surgical articles and personal opinion, South African health-related news, obituaries and general correspondence.
期刊最新文献
A case report on lingual schwannoma. Adult small bowel volvulus - a case series. Can we trust the data? - the data detective. Endoscopy-induced complication of barotrauma with concomitant benign pneumoperitoneum. Late presentation of Bochdalek hernia in children - experience at a single centre.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1