Technical success of endoscopic stenting for malignant gastric outlet obstruction.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY South African Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2023-11-01
D Tait, M F Scriba, C Robinson, E G Jonas, G E Chinnery
{"title":"Technical success of endoscopic stenting for malignant gastric outlet obstruction.","authors":"D Tait, M F Scriba, C Robinson, E G Jonas, G E Chinnery","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliation of irresectable malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) using self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) is gaining popularity with high technical success rates. The aim of this study was to review and compare GOO stenting for malignancy with other series.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of all patients undergoing pyloroduodenal stenting for malignant GOO at Groote Schuur Hospital, 1 March 2018-31 August 2021, evaluating demographics, technical success, pathology, and stentrelated complications was done.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and fourteen patients, of which 38.6% were female, were included, with gastric malignancies (74.6%) being the most frequent underlying pathology. Median age was 64 years (IQR 53-70 years), with 48.2% having at least one comorbidity. The majority (96 patients; 85.7%) required only one stent. In total, 132 stent insertion attempts were undertaken. Three technical failures were experienced (one incorrect stent placement and two failed insertions), equating to a 97.4% technical success rate. Four immediate complications occurred (3.1%): two related to sedation, one incorrect stent placement and an oesophagogastric junction perforation with procedural death. Fifteen delayed complications occurred: 13 tumour in-growth blockages, one stent fracture and one case of poor radial stent expansion. Stent blockages occurred at a median of 107 days (IQR 80-275 days). Salvage stenting was 100% successful in 14 cases requiring re-stenting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Technical insertion success rates of primary and salvage duodenal stenting for malignant GOO are on par with international high-volume units. The leading pathology locally is gastric adenocarcinoma, with palliative stenting remaining a feasible and accessible option.</p>","PeriodicalId":51161,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Surgery","volume":"61 4","pages":"33-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Palliation of irresectable malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) using self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) is gaining popularity with high technical success rates. The aim of this study was to review and compare GOO stenting for malignancy with other series.

Methods: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing pyloroduodenal stenting for malignant GOO at Groote Schuur Hospital, 1 March 2018-31 August 2021, evaluating demographics, technical success, pathology, and stentrelated complications was done.

Results: One hundred and fourteen patients, of which 38.6% were female, were included, with gastric malignancies (74.6%) being the most frequent underlying pathology. Median age was 64 years (IQR 53-70 years), with 48.2% having at least one comorbidity. The majority (96 patients; 85.7%) required only one stent. In total, 132 stent insertion attempts were undertaken. Three technical failures were experienced (one incorrect stent placement and two failed insertions), equating to a 97.4% technical success rate. Four immediate complications occurred (3.1%): two related to sedation, one incorrect stent placement and an oesophagogastric junction perforation with procedural death. Fifteen delayed complications occurred: 13 tumour in-growth blockages, one stent fracture and one case of poor radial stent expansion. Stent blockages occurred at a median of 107 days (IQR 80-275 days). Salvage stenting was 100% successful in 14 cases requiring re-stenting.

Conclusion: Technical insertion success rates of primary and salvage duodenal stenting for malignant GOO are on par with international high-volume units. The leading pathology locally is gastric adenocarcinoma, with palliative stenting remaining a feasible and accessible option.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内镜支架治疗恶性胃出口梗阻的技术成功。
背景:使用自膨胀金属支架(SEMS)缓解不可切除的恶性胃出口梗阻(GOO)越来越受欢迎,技术成功率高。本研究的目的是回顾并比较恶性胃出口梗阻支架治疗与其他系列手术的效果:方法:对2018年3月1日至2021年8月31日期间在Groote Schuur医院接受幽门十二指肠支架治疗恶性GOO的所有患者进行回顾性研究,评估人口统计学、技术成功率、病理学和支架相关并发症:共纳入114名患者,其中38.6%为女性,胃恶性肿瘤(74.6%)是最常见的基础病变。中位年龄为 64 岁(IQR 53-70 岁),48.2% 的患者至少患有一种并发症。大多数患者(96 人;85.7%)只需要一个支架。总共进行了 132 次支架植入尝试。出现了三次技术失败(一次支架置入错误和两次置入失败),技术成功率为 97.4%。发生了四例即时并发症(3.1%):两例与镇静剂有关,一例支架放置错误,一例食管胃交界处穿孔并导致手术死亡。发生了 15 起延迟并发症:13例肿瘤内生长阻塞,1例支架断裂,1例支架径向扩张不良。支架阻塞发生的时间中位数为 107 天(IQR 80-275 天)。在14例需要再次植入支架的病例中,挽救性支架植入手术的成功率为100%:结论:针对恶性胃食管返流病例的十二指肠支架初治和抢救性植入的技术成功率与国际大医院相当。当地的主要病理类型是胃腺癌,姑息性支架置入仍然是一种可行且方便的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Surgery (SAJS) is a quarterly, general surgical journal. It carries research articles and letters, editorials, clinical practice and other surgical articles and personal opinion, South African health-related news, obituaries and general correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Gallbladder tuberculosis: an unlikely diagnosis after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eight-year survival with metastatic oesophageal carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature. Microductectomy under local anaesthetic for pathological nipple discharge. Is it time to change practice? Missed appendicitis presenting as necrotising fasciitis of the thigh. Abbreviated laparotomy (damage control) in emergency general surgery: indications, risks and resource-based applications in the South African context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1