Sex Differences in Effects of Exercise on Physical Function in Aging: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 ANDROLOGY World Journal of Mens Health Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-07 DOI:10.5534/wjmh.230257
Rubén Fernández-Rodríguez, Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno, Sara Reina-Gutiérrez, Bruno Bizzozero-Peroni, Ana Torres-Costoso, Eva Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, Valentina Díaz-Goñi, Cristina Cadenas-Sánchez
{"title":"Sex Differences in Effects of Exercise on Physical Function in Aging: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Rubén Fernández-Rodríguez, Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno, Sara Reina-Gutiérrez, Bruno Bizzozero-Peroni, Ana Torres-Costoso, Eva Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, Valentina Díaz-Goñi, Cristina Cadenas-Sánchez","doi":"10.5534/wjmh.230257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our objective was to synthesize and determine whether there are sex differences in physical function following exercise interventions in older adults.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in four databases from inception to July 8th, 2023 searching for prospective trials that conducted exercise interventions in older adults and results for physical function were reported by sex. Pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a randomeffects method. The Sidik-Jonkman estimator was used to calculate the variance of heterogeneity (<i>I</i>²).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 19 studies involving 20,133 older adults (mean age ≥60 years, 33.7% female) were included. After exercise interventions, males reported significantly greater pre-post changes compared to females for upper body strength (SMD=-0.40, 95% CI: -0.71 to -0.09; <i>I</i>²=75.6%; n=8), lower body strength (SMD=-0.32, 95% CI: -0.55 to -0.10; <i>I</i>²=52.0%; n=11), and cardiorespiratory fitness (SMD=-0.29, 95% CI: -0.48 to -0.10; <i>I</i>²=89.1%; n=12). Conversely, the pooled SMDs showed a significant effect favoring females for motor fitness (SMD=0.21, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.39; <i>I</i>²=0%; n=7). Limited and inconsistent results were observed for flexibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests the existence of sex-related differences on physical function after an exercise intervention in the older population.</p>","PeriodicalId":54261,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Mens Health","volume":" ","pages":"694-711"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11439799/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Mens Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.230257","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Our objective was to synthesize and determine whether there are sex differences in physical function following exercise interventions in older adults.

Materials and methods: A systematic search was conducted in four databases from inception to July 8th, 2023 searching for prospective trials that conducted exercise interventions in older adults and results for physical function were reported by sex. Pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a randomeffects method. The Sidik-Jonkman estimator was used to calculate the variance of heterogeneity (I²).

Results: A total of 19 studies involving 20,133 older adults (mean age ≥60 years, 33.7% female) were included. After exercise interventions, males reported significantly greater pre-post changes compared to females for upper body strength (SMD=-0.40, 95% CI: -0.71 to -0.09; I²=75.6%; n=8), lower body strength (SMD=-0.32, 95% CI: -0.55 to -0.10; I²=52.0%; n=11), and cardiorespiratory fitness (SMD=-0.29, 95% CI: -0.48 to -0.10; I²=89.1%; n=12). Conversely, the pooled SMDs showed a significant effect favoring females for motor fitness (SMD=0.21, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.39; I²=0%; n=7). Limited and inconsistent results were observed for flexibility.

Conclusions: Our study suggests the existence of sex-related differences on physical function after an exercise intervention in the older population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动对老年身体功能影响的性别差异:带 Meta 分析的系统性综述》。
目的:我们的目的是综合分析并确定老年人运动干预后身体功能是否存在性别差异:从开始到2023年7月8日,我们在四个数据库中进行了系统性检索,搜索对老年人进行运动干预的前瞻性试验,并按性别报告了身体功能的结果。采用随机效应法估算了汇总的标准化均值差异(SMDs)及其95%置信区间(CIs)。使用 Sidik-Jonkman 估计器计算异质性方差(I²):共纳入了 19 项研究,涉及 20133 名老年人(平均年龄≥60 岁,33.7% 为女性)。运动干预后,男性上肢力量(SMD=-0.40,95% CI:-0.71 至 -0.09;I²=75.6%;n=8)、下肢力量(SMD=-0.32,95% CI:-0.55 至 -0.10;I²=52.0%;n=11)和心肺功能(SMD=-0.29,95% CI:-0.48 至 -0.10;I²=89.1%;n=12)的事后变化明显大于女性。相反,汇总的 SMD 显示,女性在运动健身方面具有显著的优势(SMD=0.21,95% CI:0.03 至 0.39;I²=0%;n=7)。在柔韧性方面观察到的结果有限且不一致:我们的研究表明,在老年人群中,运动干预后身体功能的性别差异是存在的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Mens Health
World Journal of Mens Health Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.10%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Unlocking the Potential of ChatGPT in Male Sexual Health and Dysfunction: A Hold Endeavor and Comprehensive Study. Postoperative Progress of Deep Grid Incision and Sealing with Collagen Fleece for Treatment of Peyronie's Disease: Prospective Observational Study for 3 Years. Identification of Correlation Between Frailty and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Elderly Male Using Korean-FRAIL Scale. Yes-Associated Protein Promotes Endothelial-Mesenchymal Transition to Mediate Diabetes Mellitus Erectile Dysfunction by Phosphorylating Smad3. Diagnosis and Management of Peyronie's Disease: A Clinical Consensus Statement and Recommendations from the Korean Society for Sexual Medicine and Andrology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1