Prevalence of malocclusions requiring treatment according to the KIG classification : A multipart cross-sectional study over a 20-year period in the district of Viersen/North Rhine.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie Pub Date : 2024-03-07 DOI:10.1007/s00056-024-00518-1
Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger, Jan Hourfar, Jörg Alexander Lisson
{"title":"Prevalence of malocclusions requiring treatment according to the KIG classification : A multipart cross-sectional study over a 20-year period in the district of Viersen/North Rhine.","authors":"Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger, Jan Hourfar, Jörg Alexander Lisson","doi":"10.1007/s00056-024-00518-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>In Germany, the reimbursement of orthodontic treatment costs within the framework of the statutory health insurance (GKV) was restricted on 01 January 2002 by the introduction of the orthodontic indication groups (KIG). The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of findings requiring treatment in a specialist practice over a 20-year period. The results were then compared with data from existing older studies.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The distribution of treatment-eligible KIG (KIG classifications grades 3-5) among patients with statutory health insurance in an orthodontic practice in North Rhine was determined over a 20-year period (2002-2021) after the introduction of the KIG system. This period was additionally scrutinized in four 5‑year periods according to the operating cycles of the practice. Findings were classified into the highest of 19 possible KIG treatment needs levels. Multiple classifications were not made.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Orthodontic treatment was indicated in a total of 4537 (2393 female, 2144 male) patients according to current statutory health insurance guidelines. The KIG classification \"D\" (increased overjet) was the most frequent within the observed 20 years with 24.3%. Among 11 KIG classifications, 86.1% of the 6 most frequent and 13.9% of the 5 rarest findings were observed constantly over all periods. Of 19 possible indications, \"D4\" was the most frequent with 19.6%. Of 4537 patients, 20.7% had KIG grade 3, 63.6% KIG grade 4 and 15.7% KIG grade 5. The prevalence of sagittal deviations \"D\" and \"M\" was 35.0%, transverse \"B\" and \"K\" 17.9% and vertical \"O\" and \"T\" 3.7%. Tooth position anomalies \"E\" and \"P\" had a share of 24.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study confirms existing findings as well as the nationwide data of the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Dentists (KZBV) from 2020: The sagittal deviations \"D\" (increased overjet) and \"M\" (negative overjet) represented the most frequent findings with KIG D4 as the most common classification. The prevalence and age distribution of KIG grades 3-5 requiring treatment corresponded to nationwide comparative data.</p>","PeriodicalId":54776,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-024-00518-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: In Germany, the reimbursement of orthodontic treatment costs within the framework of the statutory health insurance (GKV) was restricted on 01 January 2002 by the introduction of the orthodontic indication groups (KIG). The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of findings requiring treatment in a specialist practice over a 20-year period. The results were then compared with data from existing older studies.

Patients and methods: The distribution of treatment-eligible KIG (KIG classifications grades 3-5) among patients with statutory health insurance in an orthodontic practice in North Rhine was determined over a 20-year period (2002-2021) after the introduction of the KIG system. This period was additionally scrutinized in four 5‑year periods according to the operating cycles of the practice. Findings were classified into the highest of 19 possible KIG treatment needs levels. Multiple classifications were not made.

Results: Orthodontic treatment was indicated in a total of 4537 (2393 female, 2144 male) patients according to current statutory health insurance guidelines. The KIG classification "D" (increased overjet) was the most frequent within the observed 20 years with 24.3%. Among 11 KIG classifications, 86.1% of the 6 most frequent and 13.9% of the 5 rarest findings were observed constantly over all periods. Of 19 possible indications, "D4" was the most frequent with 19.6%. Of 4537 patients, 20.7% had KIG grade 3, 63.6% KIG grade 4 and 15.7% KIG grade 5. The prevalence of sagittal deviations "D" and "M" was 35.0%, transverse "B" and "K" 17.9% and vertical "O" and "T" 3.7%. Tooth position anomalies "E" and "P" had a share of 24.6%.

Conclusions: The present study confirms existing findings as well as the nationwide data of the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Dentists (KZBV) from 2020: The sagittal deviations "D" (increased overjet) and "M" (negative overjet) represented the most frequent findings with KIG D4 as the most common classification. The prevalence and age distribution of KIG grades 3-5 requiring treatment corresponded to nationwide comparative data.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据 KIG 分类法得出的需要治疗的畸形患病率:在维耶森/北莱茵地区进行的一项为期 20 年的多部分横断面研究。
背景和目的:2002 年 1 月 1 日,德国引入了正畸适应症组(KIG),从而限制了法定医疗保险(GKV)框架内正畸治疗费用的报销。本研究的目的是评估一家专科诊所在 20 年间需要治疗的结果的发生率。然后将研究结果与现有的旧研究数据进行比较:患者和方法:在北莱茵地区的一家正畸专科医院,我们对 KIG 系统引入后的 20 年间(2002-2021 年)法定医疗保险患者中符合治疗条件的 KIG(KIG 分级 3-5 级)的分布情况进行了调查。此外,还根据该诊所的运营周期,将这一时期分为四个 5 年期进行了审查。研究结果被划分为 19 个可能的 KIG 治疗需求等级中的最高等级。没有进行多重分类:根据现行的法定医疗保险指南,共有 4537 名患者(2393 名女性,2144 名男性)需要接受正畸治疗。在所观察的 20 年中,KIG 分类 "D"(过咬合增加)最常见,占 24.3%。在 11 个 KIG 分类中,最常见的 6 个分类中的 86.1%和最罕见的 5 个分类中的 13.9%在所有时间段内都被持续观察到。在 19 种可能的适应症中,"D4 "最为常见,占 19.6%。在 4537 名患者中,20.7% 的患者有 KIG 3 级,63.6% 的患者有 KIG 4 级,15.7% 的患者有 KIG 5 级。矢状偏差 "D "和 "M "的发生率为 35.0%,横向偏差 "B "和 "K "的发生率为 17.9%,垂直偏差 "O "和 "T "的发生率为 3.7%。牙齿位置异常 "E "和 "P "占 24.6%:本研究证实了现有的研究结果以及全国法定医疗保险牙医协会(KZBV)2020 年的全国数据:矢状面偏差 "D"(过咬合增加)和 "M"(负过咬合)是最常见的结果,KIG D4是最常见的分类。需要治疗的 KIG 3-5 级的发病率和年龄分布与全国的比较数据相符。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics provides orthodontists and dentists who are also actively interested in orthodontics, whether in university clinics or private practice, with highly authoritative and up-to-date information based on experimental and clinical research. The journal is one of the leading publications for the promulgation of the results of original work both in the areas of scientific and clinical orthodontics and related areas. All articles undergo peer review before publication. The German Society of Orthodontics (DGKFO) also publishes in the journal important communications, statements and announcements.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Influence of functional and esthetic expectations on orthodontic pain. Mitteilungen der DGKFO. Dentoskeletal effects of clear aligner vs twin block-a short-term study of functional appliances. Evaluation and comparison of planum clival angle in three malocclusion groups : A CBCT study. Survival rates of mandibular fixed retainers: comparison of a tube-type retainer and conventional multistrand retainers : A prospective randomized clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1