Attitudes toward Social Issues Related to Opioid Use among Palliative Care Physicians.

In Cheol Hwang, Seong Hoon Shin, Youn Seon Choi, Myung Ah Lee, DaeKyun Kim, Kyung Hee Lee
{"title":"Attitudes toward Social Issues Related to Opioid Use among Palliative Care Physicians.","authors":"In Cheol Hwang, Seong Hoon Shin, Youn Seon Choi, Myung Ah Lee, DaeKyun Kim, Kyung Hee Lee","doi":"10.14475/jhpc.2024.27.1.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated palliative care physicians' attitudes regarding social issues related to opioid use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An email survey was sent to 674 physicians who were members of the Korean Society for Hospice and Palliative Care (KSHPC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 66 physicians were analyzed (response rate, 9.8%). About 70% of participants stated that their prescribing patterns were not influenced by social issues related to opioid use, and 90% of participants thought that additional regulations should be limited to non-cancer pain. Under the current circumstances, pain education for physicians is urgently needed, as well as increased awareness among the public. Half of the respondents identified the KSHPC as the primary organization responsible for providing pain education.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Palliative care physicians' prescribing patterns were not influenced by social issues related to opioid use, and these issues also should not affect cancer pain control.</p>","PeriodicalId":73780,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospice and palliative care","volume":"27 1","pages":"45-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10911981/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospice and palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14475/jhpc.2024.27.1.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated palliative care physicians' attitudes regarding social issues related to opioid use.

Methods: An email survey was sent to 674 physicians who were members of the Korean Society for Hospice and Palliative Care (KSHPC).

Results: Data from 66 physicians were analyzed (response rate, 9.8%). About 70% of participants stated that their prescribing patterns were not influenced by social issues related to opioid use, and 90% of participants thought that additional regulations should be limited to non-cancer pain. Under the current circumstances, pain education for physicians is urgently needed, as well as increased awareness among the public. Half of the respondents identified the KSHPC as the primary organization responsible for providing pain education.

Conclusion: Palliative care physicians' prescribing patterns were not influenced by social issues related to opioid use, and these issues also should not affect cancer pain control.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
姑息治疗医生对阿片类药物使用相关社会问题的态度。
目的:本研究调查了姑息关怀医生对阿片类药物使用相关社会问题的态度:方法:向韩国安宁缓和医疗协会(KSHPC)的 674 名会员医生发送电子邮件调查:对 66 名医生的数据进行了分析(回复率为 9.8%)。约 70% 的参与者表示,他们的处方模式不受与阿片类药物使用相关的社会问题的影响,90% 的参与者认为额外的规定应仅限于非癌症疼痛。在当前情况下,迫切需要对医生进行疼痛教育,并提高公众的认识。半数受访者认为 KSHPC 是负责提供疼痛教育的主要机构:姑息治疗医生的处方模式不受与阿片类药物使用相关的社会问题的影响,这些问题也不应影响癌症疼痛控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Phased Plan for the Expansion of Hospice and Palliative Care. Content Analysis of Online Resources Regarding Needs for Advance Care Planning. Ethical and Practical Issues with the Use of Antimicrobial Agents during the End of Life. An Evolutionary Concept Analysis of Pediatric Hospice and Palliative Care. Early Hospice Consultation Team Engagement for Cancer Pain Relief: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1