[Construct validity of the TECS questionnaire for the quality of teamwork in surgery].

Cirugia y cirujanos Pub Date : 2024-03-06 DOI:10.24875/CIRU.23000297

Luis C Domínguez, Neil Valentín-Vega, Eduardo Tuta-Quintero, Diego Sierra, Álvaro Sanabria

{"title":"[Construct validity of the TECS questionnaire for the quality of teamwork in surgery].","authors":"Luis C Domínguez, Neil Valentín-Vega, Eduardo Tuta-Quintero, Diego Sierra, Álvaro Sanabria","doi":"10.24875/CIRU.23000297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess the construct validity and reliability of the Trabajo en Equipo en Cirugía (TECS) questionnaire.Method: The questionnaire was administered to 401 undergraduate students who were doing surgery practices at three universities. An exploratory factor analysis was performed on the first 200 observations, and a confirmatory factor analysis on the remaining ones. The reliability of the instrument was established with Cronbach's alpha.Results: The average age of the study population was 22 years (± 1.4) and 65.5% were women. The factors \"Student's disposition towards teamwork\", \"Structure of the work environment\" and \"Leadership and collaboration in the work team\" showed excellent internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.94. The results in the exploratory factor analysis showed adequate goodness of fit with the empirical data.Conclusions: The TECS is a valid (content and construct) and reliable instrument to assess the quality of teamwork in surgery in medical students.","PeriodicalId":93936,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia y cirujanos","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia y cirujanos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.23000297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the construct validity and reliability of the Trabajo en Equipo en Cirugía (TECS) questionnaire.

Method: The questionnaire was administered to 401 undergraduate students who were doing surgery practices at three universities. An exploratory factor analysis was performed on the first 200 observations, and a confirmatory factor analysis on the remaining ones. The reliability of the instrument was established with Cronbach's alpha.

Results: The average age of the study population was 22 years (± 1.4) and 65.5% were women. The factors "Student's disposition towards teamwork", "Structure of the work environment" and "Leadership and collaboration in the work team" showed excellent internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.94. The results in the exploratory factor analysis showed adequate goodness of fit with the empirical data.

Conclusions: The TECS is a valid (content and construct) and reliable instrument to assess the quality of teamwork in surgery in medical students.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

[外科团队合作质量 TECS 问卷的结构效度]。

目的：评估 TECS 问卷的结构有效性和可靠性：评估Trabajo en Equipo en Cirugía (TECS)问卷的结构效度和信度：对三所大学的 401 名外科实习本科生进行了问卷调查。对前 200 个调查对象进行了探索性因素分析，对其余调查对象进行了确认性因素分析。问卷的信度由 Cronbach's alpha 确定：研究对象的平均年龄为 22 岁（±1.4），65.5% 为女性。学生对团队合作的态度"、"工作环境的结构 "和 "工作团队中的领导与合作 "这三个因子的内部一致性非常好，Cronbach's alpha 为 0.94。探索性因子分析的结果显示与实证数据充分吻合：TECS是评估医学生外科团队合作质量的有效（内容和建构）且可靠的工具。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Cirugia y cirujanos

自引率

0.00%

发文量