Utilization of Japanese long-term care-related data including Kaigo-DB: An analysis of current trends and future directions.

IF 1.9 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Global health & medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.35772/ghm.2023.01135
Taeko Watanabe, Nanako Tamiya
{"title":"Utilization of Japanese long-term care-related data including Kaigo-DB: An analysis of current trends and future directions.","authors":"Taeko Watanabe, Nanako Tamiya","doi":"10.35772/ghm.2023.01135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite high expectations from the government and researchers regarding data utilization, comprehensive analysis of long-term care (LTC)-related data use has been limited. This study reviewed the use of LTC-related data, including Kaigo-DB, in Japan after 2020. There was an increase in studies using LTC-related data in Japan between 2020 and 2021, followed by a stabilization period. The national government provided 13.5% of this data (6.5% from Kaigo-DB), while prefectures and municipalities contributed 85.2%, and facilities provided 1.3%. The linked data used in 90.4% of the studies primarily consisted of original questionnaire or interview surveys (34.6%) and medical claims (34.0%). None of the studies based on Kaigo-DB utilized linked data. In terms of study design, cohort studies were the most common (84.6%), followed by descriptive (5.1%), cross-sectional (3.2%), and case-control studies (1.3%). Among the 138 individual-based analytical descriptive studies, the most frequently used LTC-related data as an exposure was LTC services (26.8%), and the most common data used as an outcome was LTC certification or care need level (43.5%), followed by the independence degree of daily living for the older adults with dementia (18.1%). To enhance the use of LTC-related data, especially the valuable national Kaigo-DB, insights can be gleaned from how researchers effectively utilize municipal and prefectural data. Streamlining access to Kaigo-DB and enabling its linkage with other datasets are promising for future research in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":12556,"journal":{"name":"Global health & medicine","volume":"6 1","pages":"63-69"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10912809/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global health & medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35772/ghm.2023.01135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite high expectations from the government and researchers regarding data utilization, comprehensive analysis of long-term care (LTC)-related data use has been limited. This study reviewed the use of LTC-related data, including Kaigo-DB, in Japan after 2020. There was an increase in studies using LTC-related data in Japan between 2020 and 2021, followed by a stabilization period. The national government provided 13.5% of this data (6.5% from Kaigo-DB), while prefectures and municipalities contributed 85.2%, and facilities provided 1.3%. The linked data used in 90.4% of the studies primarily consisted of original questionnaire or interview surveys (34.6%) and medical claims (34.0%). None of the studies based on Kaigo-DB utilized linked data. In terms of study design, cohort studies were the most common (84.6%), followed by descriptive (5.1%), cross-sectional (3.2%), and case-control studies (1.3%). Among the 138 individual-based analytical descriptive studies, the most frequently used LTC-related data as an exposure was LTC services (26.8%), and the most common data used as an outcome was LTC certification or care need level (43.5%), followed by the independence degree of daily living for the older adults with dementia (18.1%). To enhance the use of LTC-related data, especially the valuable national Kaigo-DB, insights can be gleaned from how researchers effectively utilize municipal and prefectural data. Streamlining access to Kaigo-DB and enabling its linkage with other datasets are promising for future research in this field.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本长期护理相关数据(包括 Kaigo-DB)的利用:当前趋势和未来方向分析。
尽管政府和研究人员对数据利用寄予厚望,但对长期护理(LTC)相关数据使用的全面分析却十分有限。本研究回顾了 2020 年后日本长期护理相关数据(包括 Kaigo-DB)的使用情况。在 2020 年至 2021 年期间,日本使用长期护理相关数据的研究有所增加,随后进入稳定期。在这些数据中,国家政府提供了 13.5%(6.5% 来自 Kaigo-DB),都道府县和市镇提供了 85.2%,设施提供了 1.3%。90.4% 的研究使用的链接数据主要包括原始问卷或访谈调查(34.6%)和医疗报销单(34.0%)。基于Kaigo-DB的研究均未使用链接数据。在研究设计方面,队列研究最为常见(84.6%),其次是描述性研究(5.1%)、横断面研究(3.2%)和病例对照研究(1.3%)。在 138 项以个人为基础的分析描述性研究中,最常使用的与长期护理相关的暴露数据是长期护理服务(26.8%),最常使用的结果数据是长期护理认证或护理需求水平(43.5%),其次是患有痴呆症的老年人的日常生活独立程度(18.1%)。为了加强对长寿护理相关数据的利用,尤其是宝贵的国家 Kaigo-DB 数据,研究人员可以从如何有效利用市级和都道府县数据中获得启示。简化对 KaigoDB 的访问并使其与其他数据集建立联系,对该领域的未来研究大有可为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advances in HIV management and challenges in Japan: Current situation of pre-exposure prophylaxis in Tokyo. Analysis of tumor infiltrating immune cells in Kaposi sarcoma lesions discovers shifts in macrophage populations. Changes in epidemiological and treatment-related characteristics among newly reported HIV/AIDS cases in an urban area in Shanghai, China from 2001 to 2019: A population-based retrospective study. Exploration of PrEP/PEP service delivery model in China: A pilot in eastern, central and western region. Identification of new circulating recombinant form of HIV-1 CRF139_02B in Japan, and search for the origin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1