The engagement of Polish residents with their home space in single-family houses and flats in multi-family blocks of flats

IF 1.8 3区 经济学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Journal of Housing and the Built Environment Pub Date : 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1007/s10901-024-10112-x
Angelika Lasiewicz-Sych, Maria Lewicka
{"title":"The engagement of Polish residents with their home space in single-family houses and flats in multi-family blocks of flats","authors":"Angelika Lasiewicz-Sych, Maria Lewicka","doi":"10.1007/s10901-024-10112-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Two of the most common types of housing in Poland are single-family houses and flats in blocks of flats. Overall, more than 80 per cent of Poles live in either individual houses or blocks of flats, almost in equal proportions across the country. Houses can be found in rural and urban areas, while flats are mainly located in towns. This study aims to explore the differences in the way residents of these two types of dwellings engage with their home spaces and to try to explain these differences in terms of architectural factors. Using the psycho-sociological lenses of preferences and the architectural tools of spatial syntax, we surveyed a sample of Polish people living in single-family houses (<i>n</i> = 209) and flats in blocks of flats (<i>n</i> = 215). Our participants drew their floor plans and indicated their favourite and most frequented places at home, they also expressed their emotional attitude towards home and its surroundings and explained their feelings and choices. Drawing on space syntax theory, the home plans were analysed in terms of the structural depth of (1) the home as a whole, (2) the respondent's favourite place at home, and (3) the respondent's private room at home. We found that emotional engagement with the home was higher among house dwellers than among flat dwellers, and that there were also differences in the patterns of use of specific home spaces, mostly related to the division of the home into shared and private areas and the impact of the overall spatial depth of the home layout. Gender and occupational differences were particularly pronounced among participants living in houses, whereas they largely disappeared among participants living in blocks of flats. The study contributes to a better understanding of the way home space is psychologically constructed in these two types of housing in the Polish context, but also beyond, not least by inviting scholars to mobilise the tools of spatial syntax analysis to understand residents' engagement with their home space.</p>","PeriodicalId":47558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Housing and the Built Environment","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Housing and the Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-024-10112-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two of the most common types of housing in Poland are single-family houses and flats in blocks of flats. Overall, more than 80 per cent of Poles live in either individual houses or blocks of flats, almost in equal proportions across the country. Houses can be found in rural and urban areas, while flats are mainly located in towns. This study aims to explore the differences in the way residents of these two types of dwellings engage with their home spaces and to try to explain these differences in terms of architectural factors. Using the psycho-sociological lenses of preferences and the architectural tools of spatial syntax, we surveyed a sample of Polish people living in single-family houses (n = 209) and flats in blocks of flats (n = 215). Our participants drew their floor plans and indicated their favourite and most frequented places at home, they also expressed their emotional attitude towards home and its surroundings and explained their feelings and choices. Drawing on space syntax theory, the home plans were analysed in terms of the structural depth of (1) the home as a whole, (2) the respondent's favourite place at home, and (3) the respondent's private room at home. We found that emotional engagement with the home was higher among house dwellers than among flat dwellers, and that there were also differences in the patterns of use of specific home spaces, mostly related to the division of the home into shared and private areas and the impact of the overall spatial depth of the home layout. Gender and occupational differences were particularly pronounced among participants living in houses, whereas they largely disappeared among participants living in blocks of flats. The study contributes to a better understanding of the way home space is psychologically constructed in these two types of housing in the Polish context, but also beyond, not least by inviting scholars to mobilise the tools of spatial syntax analysis to understand residents' engagement with their home space.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波兰居民在独户住宅和多户公寓楼中的家居空间参与情况
波兰最常见的两种住房类型是独栋别墅和公寓楼。总体而言,80% 以上的波兰人居住在独栋住宅或公寓楼中,全国各地的比例几乎相同。住宅分布在农村和城市地区,而公寓主要分布在城镇。本研究旨在探讨这两类住宅的居民与家居空间接触方式的差异,并试图从建筑因素的角度解释这些差异。我们使用偏好的社会心理学视角和空间句法的建筑工具,对居住在独栋别墅(209 人)和公寓楼(215 人)中的波兰人进行了抽样调查。我们的参与者绘制了他们的平面图,指出了他们最喜欢和最常去的家居场所,还表达了他们对家及其周围环境的情感态度,并解释了他们的感受和选择。借鉴空间综合理论,我们从以下几个方面对家庭平面图进行了结构深度分析:(1) 家庭整体;(2) 受访者最喜欢的家庭场所;(3) 受访者在家中的私人房间。我们发现,与居住在公寓中的人相比,居住在别墅中的人对家的情感投入更高,而且在使用特定家居空间的模式上也存在差异,这主要与将家划分为共享区域和私人区域以及家居布局的整体空间深度的影响有关。性别和职业差异在住宅参与者中尤为明显,而在公寓参与者中则基本消失。这项研究有助于更好地理解在波兰这两类住房中家庭空间的心理建构方式,同时也有助于更好地理解其他国家的情况,尤其是有助于学者们利用空间句法分析工具来理解居民对家庭空间的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: The Journal of Housing and the Built Environment is a scholarly journal presenting the results of scientific research and new developments in policy and practice to a diverse readership of specialists, practitioners and policy-makers. This refereed journal covers the fields of housing, spatial planning, building and urban development. The journal guarantees high scientific quality by a double blind review procedure. Next to that, the editorial board discusses each article as well. Leading scholars in the field of housing, spatial planning and urban development publish regularly in Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. The journal publishes articles from scientists all over the world, both Western and non-Western, providing a truly international platform for developments in both theory and practice in the fields of housing, spatial planning, building and urban development. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment (HBE) has a wide scope and includes all topics dealing with people-environment relations. Topics concern social relations within the built environment as well as the physicals component of the built environment. As such the journal brings together social science and engineering. HBE is of interest for scientists like housing researchers, social geographers, (urban) planners and architects. Furthermore it presents a forum for practitioners to present their experiences in new developments on policy and practice. Because of its unique structure of research articles and policy and practice contributions, HBE provides a forum where science and practice can be confronted. Finally, each volume of HBE contains one special issue, in which recent developments on one particular topic are discussed in depth. The aim of Journal of Housing and the Built Environment is to give international exposure to recent research and policy and practice developments on the built environment and thereby open up a forum wherein re searchers can exchange ideas and develop contacts. In this way HBE seeks to enhance the quality of research in the field and disseminate the results to a wider audience. Its scope is intended to interest scientists as well as policy-makers, both in government and in organizations dealing with housing and urban issues.
期刊最新文献
Sharing housing: a solution to – or a reflection of – housing inequality? The mediating role of sense of place in relationship between localized social ties and residential satisfaction Rules of organized chaos: patterns in self-help incremental housing in Kampung Cikini, Jakarta Green spaces in Polish large prefabricated housing estates developed in the socialist era Housing cooperatives in Egypt: challenges, constraints, and solutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1