Critical cognitive science: A systematic review towards a critical science

IF 4 1区 社会学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Social Issues Pub Date : 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1111/josi.12597
Iván Carbajal, Everrett Moore, Lianelys Cabrera Martinez, Kiara Hunt
{"title":"Critical cognitive science: A systematic review towards a critical science","authors":"Iván Carbajal,&nbsp;Everrett Moore,&nbsp;Lianelys Cabrera Martinez,&nbsp;Kiara Hunt","doi":"10.1111/josi.12597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many leading scholars have highlighted the use of Critical Race Theory (CRT) in approaching research and practice in psychology. Critical Race Theory allows for cognitive science to take a more intersectional perspective rather than perpetuate the exclusionary and universal limitations associated with traditional cognitive science. This review and commentary apply CRT to cognitive science to address three main goals. The first is describing the history of cognitive science and how CRT tenets can help understand the need for a critical race perspective. Second is applying the CRT tenet of recognizing racism in cognitive science through a rigorous systematic review. The third is highlighting the tenet of whitewashing psychological phenomenon to explain epistemic exclusion and provide recommendations to combat it. CRT is an important framework in cognitive science as it can help combat the harmful methodologies and implications that have been perpetuated for decades (e.g., racist assumption of intelligence, exclusion of participants because of hair texture).</p>","PeriodicalId":17008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Issues","volume":"80 1","pages":"100-123"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josi.12597","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many leading scholars have highlighted the use of Critical Race Theory (CRT) in approaching research and practice in psychology. Critical Race Theory allows for cognitive science to take a more intersectional perspective rather than perpetuate the exclusionary and universal limitations associated with traditional cognitive science. This review and commentary apply CRT to cognitive science to address three main goals. The first is describing the history of cognitive science and how CRT tenets can help understand the need for a critical race perspective. Second is applying the CRT tenet of recognizing racism in cognitive science through a rigorous systematic review. The third is highlighting the tenet of whitewashing psychological phenomenon to explain epistemic exclusion and provide recommendations to combat it. CRT is an important framework in cognitive science as it can help combat the harmful methodologies and implications that have been perpetuated for decades (e.g., racist assumption of intelligence, exclusion of participants because of hair texture).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
批判性认知科学:面向批判性科学的系统回顾
许多著名学者都强调在心理学研究和实践中使用种族批判理论(CRT)。批判性种族理论允许认知科学采用更具交叉性的视角,而不是延续与传统认知科学相关的排斥性和普遍性局限。本综述和评论将批判性种族理论应用于认知科学,以实现三个主要目标。首先是描述认知科学的历史,以及 CRT 原则如何帮助理解批判性种族视角的必要性。其次是通过严格的系统性回顾,应用 CRT 原则来认识认知科学中的种族主义。第三是强调粉饰心理现象的宗旨,以解释认识论上的排斥,并提出消除排斥的建议。CRT 是认知科学中的一个重要框架,因为它有助于消除几十年来一直存在的有害方法论和影响(如智力的种族主义假设、因发质而排斥参与者)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Published for The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (SPSSI), the Journal of Social Issues (JSI) brings behavioral and social science theory, empirical evidence, and practice to bear on human and social problems. Each issue of the journal focuses on a single topic - recent issues, for example, have addressed poverty, housing and health; privacy as a social and psychological concern; youth and violence; and the impact of social class on education.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Challenging the Status-Quo with Practical Theory: Introduction to John T. Jost's Kurt Lewin Award Address From oppressive to affirmative: Situating the health and well-being of LGBTIQ+ people as impacted by systemic and structural transitions in Russia, Turkey, Pakistan, and India Reimagining LGBTIQ+ research – Acknowledging differences across subpopulations, methods, and countries The damaging legacy of damage-centered LGBTIQ+ research: Implications for healthcare and LGBTIQ+ health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1