Third Country Relations and the Equivalence Regime: Treatment of Collective Investment Schemes

IF 2.1 4区 社会学 Q3 BUSINESS European Business Organization Law Review Pub Date : 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1007/s40804-024-00313-w
{"title":"Third Country Relations and the Equivalence Regime: Treatment of Collective Investment Schemes","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s40804-024-00313-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>European legislation on investment funds does not provide for a single coherent third country regime. The UCITS Directive 1985, as one of the earliest directives aiming at financial product harmonisation within the European Union, never contained a third country regime. By contrast, the much younger AIFMD contains an elaborate, staged third country regime: while the first stage is essentially based on access under national private placement regimes subject to certain harmonised minimum requirements, the second stage is based on a ‘third country passport’ obliging third country actors to become fully licensed in an EU member state of reference. Contrary to expectations at the outset of AIFMD, it is questionable whether and when the second phase will be implemented. In the light of the rather cumbersome third country access regime for non-EU fund products and asset managers, delegation of portfolio management by EU-regulated management companies to third country asset managers is an important access path for asset management services into the European Union.</p>","PeriodicalId":45278,"journal":{"name":"European Business Organization Law Review","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Business Organization Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-024-00313-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

European legislation on investment funds does not provide for a single coherent third country regime. The UCITS Directive 1985, as one of the earliest directives aiming at financial product harmonisation within the European Union, never contained a third country regime. By contrast, the much younger AIFMD contains an elaborate, staged third country regime: while the first stage is essentially based on access under national private placement regimes subject to certain harmonised minimum requirements, the second stage is based on a ‘third country passport’ obliging third country actors to become fully licensed in an EU member state of reference. Contrary to expectations at the outset of AIFMD, it is questionable whether and when the second phase will be implemented. In the light of the rather cumbersome third country access regime for non-EU fund products and asset managers, delegation of portfolio management by EU-regulated management companies to third country asset managers is an important access path for asset management services into the European Union.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第三国关系与等效制度:集体投资计划的待遇
摘要 欧洲关于投资基金的立法没有规定一个统一的第三国制度。1985 年的《UCITS 指令》是欧盟最早旨在统一金融产品的指令之一,但从未包含第三国制度。相比之下,更年轻的《AIFMD》则包含了一个详尽的、分阶段的第三国制度:第一阶段主要基于国家私募制度下的准入,但须符合某些统一的最低要求;第二阶段则基于 "第三国护照",要求第三国参与者在欧盟成员国获得全面许可。与 AIFMD 创立之初的预期相反,第二阶段是否会实施以及何时实施尚存疑问。鉴于非欧盟基金产品和资产经理的第三国准入制度相当繁琐,欧盟监管的管理公司将投资组合管理委托给第三国资产经理是资产管理服务进入欧盟的重要途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR) aims to promote a scholarly debate which critically analyses the whole range of organizations chosen by companies, groups of companies, and state-owned enterprises to pursue their business activities and offer goods and services all over the European Union. At issue are the enactment of corporate laws, the theory of firm, the theory of capital markets and related legal topics.
期刊最新文献
Enterprise Foundations and Faithful Agency as Drivers of Sustainable Long-Termism in Philanthropy Solving Investors’ Problems with Access to Evidence in Damages Litigation: Suggestions for a Future Issuer Liability Regime ESG & Executive Remuneration in Europe Interpretation of the Scope of International Commercial Arbitration Agreements: A Comparison of Swiss and Turkish Case Law Addressing the Flaws of the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation: Moving from Disclosures to Labelling and Sustainability Due Diligence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1