{"title":"Concussion Management in Older People: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Josh Elias, Emma Sutherland, Ewan Kennedy","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000000933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To map existing literature about concussion management in older people, identifying and analyzing gaps in our understanding.</p><p><strong>Context: </strong>Concussion injuries affect older people, yet little guidance is available about how to approach concussion management with older people. Research does not always include older populations, and it is unclear to what extent standard concussion management is appropriate for older people.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Scoping review.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A structured literature search was conducted using 4 databases to identify existing literature relating to concussion management in older people. Studies that assessed outcomes relating to the management of concussion/mild traumatic brain injury in those 65 years or older were included and mapped according to the main themes addressed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded a total of 18 articles. Three themes related to early management (use of anticoagulants n = 6, intracranial lesions n = 3, and service delivery for older people n = 5), and 1 theme related to general management (cognitive issues n = 4). A lack of articles exploring general management in older people was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Existing literature indicates that specific management strategies are needed for older people with concussion, especially in early management. This review highlights that good evidence is available about early management and this is reflected in some guidelines, yet little evidence about general management is available and this gap is not acknowledged in guidelines. Distinct approaches to early management in older people are clearly recommended to mitigate the risk of poor outcomes. In contrast, general concussion management for older people is poorly understood, with older people poorly represented in research. A better understanding is needed because-as observed in early management-older people have distinct characteristics that may render standard management approaches unsuitable.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"293-303"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000933","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To map existing literature about concussion management in older people, identifying and analyzing gaps in our understanding.
Context: Concussion injuries affect older people, yet little guidance is available about how to approach concussion management with older people. Research does not always include older populations, and it is unclear to what extent standard concussion management is appropriate for older people.
Design: Scoping review.
Method: A structured literature search was conducted using 4 databases to identify existing literature relating to concussion management in older people. Studies that assessed outcomes relating to the management of concussion/mild traumatic brain injury in those 65 years or older were included and mapped according to the main themes addressed.
Results: The search yielded a total of 18 articles. Three themes related to early management (use of anticoagulants n = 6, intracranial lesions n = 3, and service delivery for older people n = 5), and 1 theme related to general management (cognitive issues n = 4). A lack of articles exploring general management in older people was observed.
Conclusion: Existing literature indicates that specific management strategies are needed for older people with concussion, especially in early management. This review highlights that good evidence is available about early management and this is reflected in some guidelines, yet little evidence about general management is available and this gap is not acknowledged in guidelines. Distinct approaches to early management in older people are clearly recommended to mitigate the risk of poor outcomes. In contrast, general concussion management for older people is poorly understood, with older people poorly represented in research. A better understanding is needed because-as observed in early management-older people have distinct characteristics that may render standard management approaches unsuitable.
目标:绘制有关老年人脑震荡管理的现有文献,找出并分析我们认识上的差距:脑震荡伤害对老年人有影响,但关于如何处理老年人脑震荡的指导却很少。研究并不总是包括老年人群,而且目前还不清楚标准脑震荡处理在多大程度上适合老年人:范围综述:方法:使用 4 个数据库进行结构化文献检索,以确定与老年人脑震荡管理相关的现有文献。纳入了对 65 岁或以上老年人脑震荡/轻度脑损伤处理结果进行评估的研究,并根据所涉及的主要专题进行了分类:结果:搜索共获得 18 篇文章。三个主题与早期管理有关(使用抗凝剂 n = 6、颅内病变 n = 3 和为老年人提供服务 n = 5),一个主题与一般管理有关(认知问题 n = 4)。结论:现有文献表明,需要为患有脑震荡的老年人制定具体的管理策略,尤其是在早期管理方面。本综述着重指出,关于早期管理,目前已有很好的证据,一些指南也反映了这一点,但关于一般管理的证据却很少,指南中也没有承认这一差距。为降低不良后果的风险,明确建议对老年人采取不同的早期管理方法。相比之下,人们对老年人脑震荡的一般处理方法了解甚少,老年人在研究中的代表性也很低。我们需要更好地了解老年人的情况,因为正如在早期管理中观察到的那样,老年人具有独特的特征,这些特征可能会使标准的管理方法变得不合适。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation is a leading, peer-reviewed resource that provides up-to-date information on the clinical management and rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Six issues each year aspire to the vision of “knowledge informing care” and include a wide range of articles, topical issues, commentaries and special features. It is the official journal of the Brain Injury Association of America (BIAA).