Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder prevalence is high in children with gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurogastroenterology and Motility Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-07 DOI:10.1111/nmo.14777
Isha Kaul, Helen Burton-Murray, Salma Musaad, Yiming Mirabile, Danita Czyzewski, Miranda A L van Tilburg, Andrew C Sher, Bruno P Chumpitazi, Robert J Shulman
{"title":"Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder prevalence is high in children with gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia.","authors":"Isha Kaul, Helen Burton-Murray, Salma Musaad, Yiming Mirabile, Danita Czyzewski, Miranda A L van Tilburg, Andrew C Sher, Bruno P Chumpitazi, Robert J Shulman","doi":"10.1111/nmo.14777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) prevalence in children with gastroparesis (Gp) and/or functional dyspepsia (FD) is unknown. We aimed to identify ARFID prevalence and trajectory over 2 months in children with Gp, FD, and healthy children (HC) using two screening questionnaires. We also explored the frequency of a positive ARFID screen between those with/without delayed gastric emptying or abnormal fundic accommodation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective longitudinal study conducted at an urban tertiary care hospital, patients ages 10-17 years with Gp or FD and age- and gender-matched HC completed two validated ARFID screening tools at baseline and 2-month follow-up: the Nine Item ARFID Screen (NIAS) and the Pica, ARFID, and Rumination Disorder Interview-ARFID Questionnaire (PARDI-AR-Q). Gastric retention and fundic accommodation (for Gp and FD) were determined from gastric emptying scintigraphy.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>At baseline, the proportion of children screening positive for ARFID on the NIAS versus PARDI-AR-Q was Gp: 48.5% versus 63.6%, FD: 66.7% versus 65.2%, HC: 15.3% versus 9.7%, respectively; p < 0.0001 across groups. Of children who screened positive at baseline and participated in the follow-up, 71.9% and 53.3% were positive 2 months later (NIAS versus PARDI-AR-Q, respectively). A positive ARFID screen in Gp or FD was not related to the presence/absence of delayed gastric retention or abnormal fundic accommodation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions & inferences: </strong>ARFID detected from screening questionnaires is highly prevalent among children with Gp and FD and persists for at least 2 months in a substantial proportion of children. Children with these disorders should be screened for ARFID.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11149999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14777","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) prevalence in children with gastroparesis (Gp) and/or functional dyspepsia (FD) is unknown. We aimed to identify ARFID prevalence and trajectory over 2 months in children with Gp, FD, and healthy children (HC) using two screening questionnaires. We also explored the frequency of a positive ARFID screen between those with/without delayed gastric emptying or abnormal fundic accommodation.

Methods: In this prospective longitudinal study conducted at an urban tertiary care hospital, patients ages 10-17 years with Gp or FD and age- and gender-matched HC completed two validated ARFID screening tools at baseline and 2-month follow-up: the Nine Item ARFID Screen (NIAS) and the Pica, ARFID, and Rumination Disorder Interview-ARFID Questionnaire (PARDI-AR-Q). Gastric retention and fundic accommodation (for Gp and FD) were determined from gastric emptying scintigraphy.

Key results: At baseline, the proportion of children screening positive for ARFID on the NIAS versus PARDI-AR-Q was Gp: 48.5% versus 63.6%, FD: 66.7% versus 65.2%, HC: 15.3% versus 9.7%, respectively; p < 0.0001 across groups. Of children who screened positive at baseline and participated in the follow-up, 71.9% and 53.3% were positive 2 months later (NIAS versus PARDI-AR-Q, respectively). A positive ARFID screen in Gp or FD was not related to the presence/absence of delayed gastric retention or abnormal fundic accommodation.

Conclusions & inferences: ARFID detected from screening questionnaires is highly prevalent among children with Gp and FD and persists for at least 2 months in a substantial proportion of children. Children with these disorders should be screened for ARFID.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在患有胃瘫和功能性消化不良的儿童中,避免性/限制性食物摄入障碍的发病率很高。
背景:胃瘫(Gp)和/或功能性消化不良(FD)患儿的避免/限制性食物摄入障碍(ARFID)患病率尚不清楚。我们的目的是使用两种筛查问卷,确定胃瘫儿童、功能性消化不良儿童和健康儿童(HC)中 ARFID 的患病率和 2 个月内的变化轨迹。我们还探讨了胃排空延迟或胃底容纳异常儿童/无胃排空延迟或胃底容纳异常儿童的 ARFID 筛查阳性频率:这项前瞻性纵向研究在一家城市三甲医院进行,10-17 岁的 Gp 或 FD 患者以及年龄和性别匹配的 HC 患者在基线和 2 个月随访时完成了两种有效的 ARFID 筛查工具:ARFID 九项筛查(NIAS)和 Pica、ARFID 和反刍障碍访谈-ARFID 问卷(PARDI-AR-Q)。胃排空闪烁扫描测定了胃潴留和胃底容积(Gp和FD):主要结果:基线时,在 NIAS 与 PARDI-AR-Q 中筛查出 ARFID 阳性的儿童比例分别为 Gp:48.5%对63.6%,FD:66.7%对65.2%,HC:15.3%对9.7%;P 结论与推论:从筛查问卷中发现的 ARFID 在 Gp 和 FD 儿童中非常普遍,而且在相当一部分儿童中至少持续了两个月。患有这些疾病的儿童应接受 ARFID 筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Neurogastroenterology and Motility 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.
期刊最新文献
Burden of illness and treatment attitudes among participants meeting Rome IV criteria for irritable bowel syndrome: A nationwide survey in the United States. Defining lower esophageal sphincter physiomechanical states among esophageal motility disorders using functional lumen imaging probe panometry. Endocannabinoid signaling in stress, nausea, and vomiting. High-resolution versus conventional manometry for the diagnosis of small bowel motor dysfunction. Respiratory-swallow patterning and oropharyngeal swallowing impairment in patients undergoing evaluation for lung transplant.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1