Retained Intracerebral Depth Electrode after Stereotactic Electroencephalography Monitoring: A Case Report.

NMC case report journal Pub Date : 2024-02-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0242
Kota Kagawa, Koji Iida, Akira Hashizume, Go Seyama, Akitake Okamura, Rofat Askoro, Nobutaka Horie
{"title":"Retained Intracerebral Depth Electrode after Stereotactic Electroencephalography Monitoring: A Case Report.","authors":"Kota Kagawa, Koji Iida, Akira Hashizume, Go Seyama, Akitake Okamura, Rofat Askoro, Nobutaka Horie","doi":"10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stereotactic electroencephalography (SEEG) is an increasingly popular surgical modality for localizing the epileptogenic zone. Robot-guided stereotactic electrode placement has been covered in Japan by National Health Insurance since 2020. However, several surgical devices, such as the anchor bolt (a thin, hollow, metal shaft that serves as a guide screw or fixing for each electrode), have not been approved. A 14-year-old female who underwent SEEG for intractable epilepsy and required additional surgery to remove a retained depth electrode from the skull after the SEEG monitoring was finished. She had uncontrolled focal seizures consisting of nausea and laryngeal constriction at the onset. After a comprehensive presurgical evaluation, robot-guided stereotactic electrode implantation was performed to evaluate her seizures by SEEG. Nine depth electrodes were implanted through the twist drill hole. The electrodes were sutured to her skin for fixation without anchor bolts. When we attempted to remove the electrodes after 8 days of SEEG monitoring, one of the electrodes was retained. The retained electrode was removed through an additional skin incision and a small craniectomy under general anesthesia. We confirmed narrowing of the twist drill hole pathway in the internal table of the skull due to osteogenesis, which locked the electrode. This complication might be avoided if an anchor bolt had been used. This case report prompts the approval of the anchor bolts to avoid difficulty in electrode removal. Moreover, approval of a depth electrode with a thinner diameter and more consistent hardness is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":101331,"journal":{"name":"NMC case report journal","volume":"11 ","pages":"49-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10918211/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NMC case report journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stereotactic electroencephalography (SEEG) is an increasingly popular surgical modality for localizing the epileptogenic zone. Robot-guided stereotactic electrode placement has been covered in Japan by National Health Insurance since 2020. However, several surgical devices, such as the anchor bolt (a thin, hollow, metal shaft that serves as a guide screw or fixing for each electrode), have not been approved. A 14-year-old female who underwent SEEG for intractable epilepsy and required additional surgery to remove a retained depth electrode from the skull after the SEEG monitoring was finished. She had uncontrolled focal seizures consisting of nausea and laryngeal constriction at the onset. After a comprehensive presurgical evaluation, robot-guided stereotactic electrode implantation was performed to evaluate her seizures by SEEG. Nine depth electrodes were implanted through the twist drill hole. The electrodes were sutured to her skin for fixation without anchor bolts. When we attempted to remove the electrodes after 8 days of SEEG monitoring, one of the electrodes was retained. The retained electrode was removed through an additional skin incision and a small craniectomy under general anesthesia. We confirmed narrowing of the twist drill hole pathway in the internal table of the skull due to osteogenesis, which locked the electrode. This complication might be avoided if an anchor bolt had been used. This case report prompts the approval of the anchor bolts to avoid difficulty in electrode removal. Moreover, approval of a depth electrode with a thinner diameter and more consistent hardness is needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
立体定向脑电图监测后残留的脑内深度电极:病例报告。
立体定向脑电图(SEEG)是一种越来越受欢迎的定位致痫区的手术方式。自 2020 年起,机器人引导下的立体定向电极置入术已被纳入日本国民健康保险范围。然而,锚栓(一种细长、空心的金属轴,可用作每个电极的导向螺钉或固定装置)等几种手术设备尚未获得批准。一名 14 岁的女性因患顽固性癫痫而接受 SEEG 治疗,在 SEEG 监测结束后,她需要进行额外的手术,以移除头骨上残留的深度电极。她的局灶性癫痫发作无法控制,发病时伴有恶心和喉部收缩。经过全面的术前评估后,在机器人引导下进行了立体定向电极植入手术,通过 SEEG 评估她的癫痫发作。通过扭转钻孔植入了九个深度电极。电极被缝合在她的皮肤上,无需锚栓固定。SEEG 监测 8 天后,当我们试图取出电极时,其中一个电极被保留了下来。在全身麻醉的情况下,我们通过一个额外的皮肤切口和一个小的颅骨切除术取出了被保留的电极。我们证实,由于骨质增生,颅骨内台的扭转钻孔通道变窄,导致电极锁定。如果使用锚栓,可能会避免这一并发症。本病例报告促使我们批准使用锚栓,以避免电极移除困难。此外,还需要批准使用直径更细、硬度更稳定的深度电极。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chronic Subdural Hematoma in the Posterior Fossa Associated with Hearing Impairment during Warfarin Therapy, Improved by Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization: A Case Report. Recurrence of Solitary Fibrous Tumor in the Spinal Cord Following Gross Total and Subtotal Resection: A Case Report of Recurrence 19 Years of Post-total Resection and Systematic Literature Review. Trigeminal Neuralgia Associated with a Variant of Primitive Trigeminal Artery: A Case Report. A Late Complication Related to Percutaneous Implantable Leads for Spinal Cord Stimulation: Myelopathy due to Fibrous Scar Tissue. Endovascular Coiling for a Ruptured Middle Cerebral Artery-lenticulostriate Artery Bifurcation Aneurysm Suspected to Be a Pseudoaneurysm: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1