The effect of a preceptorship programme on newly hired experienced professional nurses’ self-efficacy in nursing clinical competency in Saudi Arabia

Elizabeth Chipwanya, Charlene Downing, Elizabeth Nkosi
{"title":"The effect of a preceptorship programme on newly hired experienced professional nurses’ self-efficacy in nursing clinical competency in Saudi Arabia","authors":"Elizabeth Chipwanya,&nbsp;Charlene Downing,&nbsp;Elizabeth Nkosi","doi":"10.1016/j.ijans.2024.100682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This study aimed to determine if participation in a preceptorship programme affected newly hired experienced professional nurses’ self-efficacy in clinical practice and whether their perceived competence was related to respondents’ demographic profiles at a university hospital in Saudi Arabia.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Formal preceptorship programmes are initiated with the aim of improving the characteristics related to new workplace adaptations, such as reducing stress and anxiety, improving effective communication, enhancing clinical performance and competencies, and learning new clinical skills. These programmes’ effectiveness in improving nurses’ self-efficacy in clinical practice is seldom measured, especially among newly hired experienced professional nurses.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A quasi-experimental, quantitative pre- and post-test one-group study design with convenient sampling was used.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Self-efficacy post-test scores were significantly higher than pre-test scores (p&lt;0.001). The programme positively influenced the respondents’ self-efficacy scores. As perceived by the respondents, the preceptorship programme had a positive effect and improved their clinical performance in the nursing process. There was no relationship between perceived competence and respondents’ demographic profiles.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Reporting on self-efficacy in clinical practice may not be the most effective, reliable or accurate measure or evaluation of clinical performance since self-scoring may be affected by existing cultural implications and a strong sense of self-efficacy. The self-scoring results may be followed by qualitative information, like interviews, to determine respondents’ knowledge of the nursing process, direct observation of performance in the clinical area and care outcomes, and confirm if the respondents’ clinical performance matches the obtained results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38091,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100682"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214139124000271/pdfft?md5=93b244d541ac8eb9e62117035b954647&pid=1-s2.0-S2214139124000271-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214139124000271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

This study aimed to determine if participation in a preceptorship programme affected newly hired experienced professional nurses’ self-efficacy in clinical practice and whether their perceived competence was related to respondents’ demographic profiles at a university hospital in Saudi Arabia.

Background

Formal preceptorship programmes are initiated with the aim of improving the characteristics related to new workplace adaptations, such as reducing stress and anxiety, improving effective communication, enhancing clinical performance and competencies, and learning new clinical skills. These programmes’ effectiveness in improving nurses’ self-efficacy in clinical practice is seldom measured, especially among newly hired experienced professional nurses.

Methods

A quasi-experimental, quantitative pre- and post-test one-group study design with convenient sampling was used.

Results

Self-efficacy post-test scores were significantly higher than pre-test scores (p<0.001). The programme positively influenced the respondents’ self-efficacy scores. As perceived by the respondents, the preceptorship programme had a positive effect and improved their clinical performance in the nursing process. There was no relationship between perceived competence and respondents’ demographic profiles.

Conclusions

Reporting on self-efficacy in clinical practice may not be the most effective, reliable or accurate measure or evaluation of clinical performance since self-scoring may be affected by existing cultural implications and a strong sense of self-efficacy. The self-scoring results may be followed by qualitative information, like interviews, to determine respondents’ knowledge of the nursing process, direct observation of performance in the clinical area and care outcomes, and confirm if the respondents’ clinical performance matches the obtained results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙特阿拉伯新聘经验丰富的专业护士临床护理能力自我效能的实习计划效果
本研究旨在确定在沙特阿拉伯的一所大学医院中,参加实习前指导计划是否会影响新聘经验丰富的专业护士在临床实践中的自我效能感,以及他们所感知的能力是否与受访者的人口统计学特征有关。背景启动正规实习前指导计划的目的是改善与新工作场所适应有关的特征,如减轻压力和焦虑、改善有效沟通、提高临床表现和能力,以及学习新的临床技能。这些计划在提高护士临床实践自我效能感方面的效果很少被衡量,尤其是在新聘用的经验丰富的专业护士中。方法采用准实验、定量前后测试的单组研究设计,方便抽样。结果自我效能感的后测得分显著高于前测得分(p<0.001)。该计划对受访者的自我效能感得分产生了积极影响。受访者认为,带教计划产生了积极影响,提高了他们在护理过程中的临床表现。结论临床实践中自我效能感的报告可能不是衡量或评估临床表现的最有效、可靠或准确的方法,因为自我评分可能会受到现有文化影响和强烈的自我效能感的影响。在得出自我评分结果后,可通过访谈等定性信息来确定受访者对护理流程的了解程度,直接观察临床表现和护理结果,并确认受访者的临床表现是否与所得结果相符。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences (IJANS) is an international scientific journal published by Elsevier. The broad-based journal was founded on two key tenets, i.e. to publish the most exciting research with respect to the subjects of Nursing and Midwifery in Africa, and secondly, to advance the international understanding and development of nursing and midwifery in Africa, both as a profession and as an academic discipline. The fully refereed journal provides a forum for all aspects of nursing and midwifery sciences, especially new trends and advances. The journal call for original research papers, systematic and scholarly review articles, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing as related to nursing and midwifery in Africa, technical reports, and short communications, and which will meet the journal''s high academic and ethical standards. Manuscripts of nursing practice, education, management, and research are encouraged. The journal values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic significance for educators, practitioners, leaders and policy-makers of nursing and midwifery in Africa. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of nursing, and is also inviting international scholars who are engaged with nursing and midwifery in Africa to contribute to the journal. We will only publish work that demonstrates the use of rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of nursing and midwifery as it relates to the Africa context.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to ‘Factors affecting HIV disclosure among partners in Morogoro, Tanzania’ [International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences Volume 10, (2019) 49-54] Tracer study to assess the employability of graduates and quality of a nursing program: A descriptive cross-sectional survey Factors that influence the quality of work life in nursing departments: A management perspective Roles, perceptions, and context of nursing student clinical facilitation in sub-Saharan Africa: An integrative review Birth stories of South African mothers of children with albinism: A critical human rights analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1