Assessing physicians’ knowledge, attitude, and practice on anticoagulant therapy in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: Syrian insights

IF 3.4 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-03-07 DOI:10.1186/s43094-024-00595-4
Sarya Swed, Haidara Bohsas, Hidar Alibrahim, Mohamad Nour Nasif, Yasmeen Abouainain, Nagham Jawish, Angela Ishak, Bassel Dibah, Eva Mahmoud, Suzanne Mahfoud, Bisher Sawaf, Wael Hafez, Nouran Omar El Said, Engy Ahmed Wahsh
{"title":"Assessing physicians’ knowledge, attitude, and practice on anticoagulant therapy in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: Syrian insights","authors":"Sarya Swed,&nbsp;Haidara Bohsas,&nbsp;Hidar Alibrahim,&nbsp;Mohamad Nour Nasif,&nbsp;Yasmeen Abouainain,&nbsp;Nagham Jawish,&nbsp;Angela Ishak,&nbsp;Bassel Dibah,&nbsp;Eva Mahmoud,&nbsp;Suzanne Mahfoud,&nbsp;Bisher Sawaf,&nbsp;Wael Hafez,&nbsp;Nouran Omar El Said,&nbsp;Engy Ahmed Wahsh","doi":"10.1186/s43094-024-00595-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent cardiac condition linked to increased mortality due to complications such as stroke. Oral anticoagulant (OAC) is the mainstay in preventing cerebrovascular accidents in patients with AF. Recent evidence identified gaps in physician’s knowledge in diagnosing and managing patients with AF. This study aims to assess Syrian physicians’ knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding the use of anticoagulant therapy in non-valvular AF (NVAF) patients. A cross-sectional study was conducted using a validated web-based questionnaire, which included 56 items separated into four sections that collected information about demographics, knowledge, attitude, and practices. Chi-square and Kruskal Wallis were performed to analyze the statistical relationships between the knowledge, attitude, practice, and demographic variables.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 497 participants completed the survey, of which 62.6% were between the ages of 25 and 35. The average participant scores for knowledge, attitude, and practices were (48.18 ± 21.57), (81.54 ± 9.26), and (62.83 ± 12.42), respectively. Participants who demonstrated good understanding, a positive attitude, and good practices were 22.3%, 87.3%, and 25.4%, respectively. The fear of bleeding was identified as the most significant barrier to initiating anticoagulant medication in AF patients (55.5%). Doctors who attended training had a better knowledge score than those who did not (mean ± S.D. = 57.24 ± 20.7). Participants who stated that over 70% of their AF patients use aspirin received the highest attitude score (mean ± S.D = 86.98 ± 21.17). PhD participants reported higher practice scores than those with other educational backgrounds (mean ± S.D = 73.96 ± 11.3).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This research showed that primary care physicians in Syria had optimistic views regarding OAC therapy, suggesting that training interventions targeting physicians may lead to improvement in the treatment of patients with NVAF in Syria.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":577,"journal":{"name":"Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://fjps.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s43094-024-00595-4","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s43094-024-00595-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent cardiac condition linked to increased mortality due to complications such as stroke. Oral anticoagulant (OAC) is the mainstay in preventing cerebrovascular accidents in patients with AF. Recent evidence identified gaps in physician’s knowledge in diagnosing and managing patients with AF. This study aims to assess Syrian physicians’ knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding the use of anticoagulant therapy in non-valvular AF (NVAF) patients. A cross-sectional study was conducted using a validated web-based questionnaire, which included 56 items separated into four sections that collected information about demographics, knowledge, attitude, and practices. Chi-square and Kruskal Wallis were performed to analyze the statistical relationships between the knowledge, attitude, practice, and demographic variables.

Results

A total of 497 participants completed the survey, of which 62.6% were between the ages of 25 and 35. The average participant scores for knowledge, attitude, and practices were (48.18 ± 21.57), (81.54 ± 9.26), and (62.83 ± 12.42), respectively. Participants who demonstrated good understanding, a positive attitude, and good practices were 22.3%, 87.3%, and 25.4%, respectively. The fear of bleeding was identified as the most significant barrier to initiating anticoagulant medication in AF patients (55.5%). Doctors who attended training had a better knowledge score than those who did not (mean ± S.D. = 57.24 ± 20.7). Participants who stated that over 70% of their AF patients use aspirin received the highest attitude score (mean ± S.D = 86.98 ± 21.17). PhD participants reported higher practice scores than those with other educational backgrounds (mean ± S.D = 73.96 ± 11.3).

Conclusion

This research showed that primary care physicians in Syria had optimistic views regarding OAC therapy, suggesting that training interventions targeting physicians may lead to improvement in the treatment of patients with NVAF in Syria.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估医生对非瓣膜性心房颤动抗凝治疗的认识、态度和实践:叙利亚的见解
背景心房颤动(房颤)是最常见的心脏疾病,与中风等并发症导致的死亡率增加有关。口服抗凝剂(OAC)是房颤患者预防脑血管意外的主要药物。最近有证据表明,医生在诊断和管理房颤患者方面存在知识差距。本研究旨在评估叙利亚医生对非瓣膜性房颤(NVAF)患者使用抗凝疗法的知识、态度和做法。该问卷包括 56 个项目,分为四个部分,收集了有关人口统计学、知识、态度和实践的信息。结果 共有 497 名参与者完成了调查,其中 62.6% 的参与者年龄在 25 岁至 35 岁之间。参与者在知识、态度和实践方面的平均得分分别为(48.18 ± 21.57)、(81.54 ± 9.26)和(62.83 ± 12.42)。表现出良好理解、积极态度和良好实践的参与者分别为 22.3%、87.3% 和 25.4%。对出血的恐惧被认为是房颤患者开始使用抗凝药物的最大障碍(55.5%)。与未参加培训的医生相比,参加培训的医生的知识得分更高(平均值 ± S.D. = 57.24 ± 20.7)。认为 70% 以上心房颤动患者使用阿司匹林的参与者的态度得分最高(平均值 ± S.D = 86.98 ± 21.17)。结论这项研究表明,叙利亚的初级保健医生对 OAC 治疗持乐观态度,这表明针对医生的培训干预措施可能会改善叙利亚 NVAF 患者的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (FJPS) is the official journal of the Future University in Egypt. It is a peer-reviewed, open access journal which publishes original research articles, review articles and case studies on all aspects of pharmaceutical sciences and technologies, pharmacy practice and related clinical aspects, and pharmacy education. The journal publishes articles covering developments in drug absorption and metabolism, pharmacokinetics and dynamics, drug delivery systems, drug targeting and nano-technology. It also covers development of new systems, methods and techniques in pharmacy education and practice. The scope of the journal also extends to cover advancements in toxicology, cell and molecular biology, biomedical research, clinical and pharmaceutical microbiology, pharmaceutical biotechnology, medicinal chemistry, phytochemistry and nutraceuticals.
期刊最新文献
Cubosomes: evolving platform for intranasal drug delivery of neurotherapeutics Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections among diabetic and non-diabetic patients and possible effective combination treatments Adenocarcinoma of unknown primary with TP53 gene polymorphism: a rare case report with literature review Design, synthesis and evaluation of new methyl piperazine derivatives as anticancer agents Solid self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems of nimodipine: development and evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1