Discrepancies in breast cancer guideline recommendations despite similar Cochrane systematic review conclusions

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-09 DOI:10.1111/jebm.12581
Zhigang Zhang, Jie Cheng, Jialu Hou, Mingming Niu, Ya Gao, Jianguo Xu, Qingyong Zheng, Kexin Ji, Min Zhang, Tian Hao, Ning Li, Xinyi Han, Xiujuan Ma, Jiajia Kong, Rui Wang, Ye Zhao, Jinhui Tian, Xiaofang Hu
{"title":"Discrepancies in breast cancer guideline recommendations despite similar Cochrane systematic review conclusions","authors":"Zhigang Zhang,&nbsp;Jie Cheng,&nbsp;Jialu Hou,&nbsp;Mingming Niu,&nbsp;Ya Gao,&nbsp;Jianguo Xu,&nbsp;Qingyong Zheng,&nbsp;Kexin Ji,&nbsp;Min Zhang,&nbsp;Tian Hao,&nbsp;Ning Li,&nbsp;Xinyi Han,&nbsp;Xiujuan Ma,&nbsp;Jiajia Kong,&nbsp;Rui Wang,&nbsp;Ye Zhao,&nbsp;Jinhui Tian,&nbsp;Xiaofang Hu","doi":"10.1111/jebm.12581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to describe the citation patterns of Cochrane systematic reviews (CSR) in guidelines for managing breast cancer.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We searched for systematic reviews on breast cancer in The Cochrane Library from the date of inception to November 15, 2023, and identified guidelines that cited them. We described how systematic reviews were cited by the guidelines in each database and each year. Additionally, we presented the relationships between the conclusions of the systematic reviews and guideline recommendations and compared the consistency of the recommendations on the same topic across different guidelines.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 64 systematic reviews and 228 guidelines were included in this study. The average number of the 64 systematic reviews cited by the guidelines was 5.91. We found that the guideline recommendations were irrelevant or inconsistent with the conclusions of the systematic reviews in 56 (38.36%) cited entries. We grouped recommendations on the same topic across different guidelines into one group, of which only 5 groups (15.15%) had completely consistent recommendations, and the other 28 groups (84.85%) had inconsistent recommendations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The average number of citations for CSR on breast cancer in the guidelines was 5.91. There were also situations in which the guideline recommendations were inconsistent with the conclusions of the included systematic reviews, and recommendations on the same topic across different guidelines were inconsistent.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jebm.12581","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jebm.12581","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

This study aims to describe the citation patterns of Cochrane systematic reviews (CSR) in guidelines for managing breast cancer.

Methods

We searched for systematic reviews on breast cancer in The Cochrane Library from the date of inception to November 15, 2023, and identified guidelines that cited them. We described how systematic reviews were cited by the guidelines in each database and each year. Additionally, we presented the relationships between the conclusions of the systematic reviews and guideline recommendations and compared the consistency of the recommendations on the same topic across different guidelines.

Results

A total of 64 systematic reviews and 228 guidelines were included in this study. The average number of the 64 systematic reviews cited by the guidelines was 5.91. We found that the guideline recommendations were irrelevant or inconsistent with the conclusions of the systematic reviews in 56 (38.36%) cited entries. We grouped recommendations on the same topic across different guidelines into one group, of which only 5 groups (15.15%) had completely consistent recommendations, and the other 28 groups (84.85%) had inconsistent recommendations.

Conclusion

The average number of citations for CSR on breast cancer in the guidelines was 5.91. There were also situations in which the guideline recommendations were inconsistent with the conclusions of the included systematic reviews, and recommendations on the same topic across different guidelines were inconsistent.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尽管科克伦系统综述结论相似,但乳腺癌指南建议却存在差异。
目的:本研究旨在描述科克伦系统综述(CSR)在乳腺癌管理指南中的引用模式:我们在 Cochrane 图书馆中搜索了自成立之日起至 2023 年 11 月 15 日的乳腺癌系统综述,并确定了引用这些综述的指南。我们描述了每个数据库和每年的指南是如何引用系统综述的。此外,我们还介绍了系统综述结论与指南建议之间的关系,并比较了不同指南对同一主题建议的一致性:本研究共纳入了 64 篇系统综述和 228 份指南。指南引用的 64 篇系统综述的平均数量为 5.91 篇。我们发现,在 56 个(38.36%)被引用的条目中,指南建议与系统综述的结论不相关或不一致。我们将不同指南中关于同一主题的建议归为一组,其中只有 5 组(15.15%)的建议完全一致,其他 28 组(84.85%)的建议不一致:结论:指南中关于乳腺癌的 CSR 的平均引用次数为 5.91 次。结论:指南中关于乳腺癌 CSR 的平均引用次数为 5.91 次,还存在指南建议与纳入的系统综述结论不一致的情况,以及不同指南对同一主题的建议不一致的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine
Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.40%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine (EMB) is an esteemed international healthcare and medical decision-making journal, dedicated to publishing groundbreaking research outcomes in evidence-based decision-making, research, practice, and education. Serving as the official English-language journal of the Cochrane China Centre and West China Hospital of Sichuan University, we eagerly welcome editorials, commentaries, and systematic reviews encompassing various topics such as clinical trials, policy, drug and patient safety, education, and knowledge translation.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation and management of knee osteoarthritis. Issue Information Diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease The Guidelines for use and promotion of low sodium salt in China The ethics of some placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1