Nurse practitioner low-value care ordering practices: an integrative review.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES American Journal of Managed Care Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.37765/ajmc.2024.89520
Sara B Nugent, Roberta P Lavin, Barbara I Holmes Damron
{"title":"Nurse practitioner low-value care ordering practices: an integrative review.","authors":"Sara B Nugent, Roberta P Lavin, Barbara I Holmes Damron","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Low-value care (LVC) health services are unsupported by current evidence, are associated with harmful patient outcomes, and equate to more than $100 billion in wasteful spending annually. Nurse practitioner (NP) LVC ordering practices among adult patients in outpatient settings are described and compared with those of other health care clinicians. Factors impacting NP ordering practices are also explored.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Integrative review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases, including MEDLINE's PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Business Source Complete, and Google Scholar were searched for original studies published prior to April 2023. Search terms included relevant keywords pertaining to LVC and NPs. Results were supplemented by a search of the reference lists of included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 20 included studies, 7 were of low quality, which limited findings. Results comparing NP LVC ordering practices with those of other health care clinicians were conflicting. When compared with physicians, NPs ordered equal rates of antibiotics in 4 studies and lumbar imaging in 6 studies; they ordered less imaging in 2 studies but more imaging in 1 study. In 1 study, NPs ordered fewer lumbar imaging studies than physician assistants. NPs reported following protocols for prescribing and found that patient education and reassurance were successful in minimizing LVC ordering when managing patient expectations. NP specialization appeared to influence LVC ordering, whereas scope of practice laws had no effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The full extent to which NPs order LVC services, as well as a comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing their decisions, remains unknown. It is unclear whether NPs order fewer or equal LVC services compared with other health care clinicians. More research on NPs and LVC is indicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89520","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Low-value care (LVC) health services are unsupported by current evidence, are associated with harmful patient outcomes, and equate to more than $100 billion in wasteful spending annually. Nurse practitioner (NP) LVC ordering practices among adult patients in outpatient settings are described and compared with those of other health care clinicians. Factors impacting NP ordering practices are also explored.

Study design: Integrative review.

Methods: Electronic databases, including MEDLINE's PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Business Source Complete, and Google Scholar were searched for original studies published prior to April 2023. Search terms included relevant keywords pertaining to LVC and NPs. Results were supplemented by a search of the reference lists of included studies.

Results: Of the 20 included studies, 7 were of low quality, which limited findings. Results comparing NP LVC ordering practices with those of other health care clinicians were conflicting. When compared with physicians, NPs ordered equal rates of antibiotics in 4 studies and lumbar imaging in 6 studies; they ordered less imaging in 2 studies but more imaging in 1 study. In 1 study, NPs ordered fewer lumbar imaging studies than physician assistants. NPs reported following protocols for prescribing and found that patient education and reassurance were successful in minimizing LVC ordering when managing patient expectations. NP specialization appeared to influence LVC ordering, whereas scope of practice laws had no effect.

Conclusions: The full extent to which NPs order LVC services, as well as a comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing their decisions, remains unknown. It is unclear whether NPs order fewer or equal LVC services compared with other health care clinicians. More research on NPs and LVC is indicated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护士开具低价值护理单的做法:综合评述。
目标:低价值护理(LVC)医疗服务缺乏现有证据支持,与对患者有害的结果相关联,相当于每年浪费超过 1,000 亿美元的开支。本文描述了护士在门诊环境中为成年患者开具低价值医疗服务单的做法,并将其与其他医疗保健临床医生的做法进行了比较。研究设计:综合综述:综合综述:在 MEDLINE's PubMed、CINAHL、Web of Science 和 Business Source Complete 等电子数据库以及 Google Scholar 中检索 2023 年 4 月之前发表的原创研究。搜索条件包括与低视力症和非专业人员相关的关键词。此外,还对纳入研究的参考文献目录进行了检索:在纳入的 20 项研究中,有 7 项研究的质量较低,这限制了研究结果。将 NP 的 LVC 下单实践与其他医疗临床医生的 LVC 下单实践进行比较的结果相互矛盾。与医生相比,在 4 项研究中,NP 下抗生素医嘱的比例与医生相同;在 6 项研究中,NP 下腰椎造影医嘱的比例与医生相同;在 2 项研究中,NP 下造影医嘱的比例较低,但在 1 项研究中,NP 下造影医嘱的比例较高。在 1 项研究中,非全科医生比医生助理开具的腰椎造影检查单更少。非全科医生报告说,他们遵循了处方协议,并发现在管理患者期望时,患者教育和安抚能成功地将腰椎造影检查的处方量降到最低。NP的专业化似乎会影响LVC的订购,而执业范围法则没有影响:结论:护士订购低病死率服务的全部情况以及影响其决定的因素的全面了解仍是未知数。目前还不清楚与其他医疗临床医生相比,护士是否会订购较少或同等的低生命质量检查服务。我们需要对 NP 和 LVC 开展更多研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Accountable care organizations and HPV vaccine uptake: a multilevel analysis. Cost savings from an mHealth tool for improving medication adherence. Hospital stays and probable dementia as predictors of relocation to long-term care facilities. Impact of functional recovery on patients having heart surgery. Patient assignment and quality performance: a misaligned system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1