An innovative multi-objective optimization approach for compact concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) column design utilizing lightweight high-strength concrete

Iman Faridmehr , Moncef L. Nehdi , Ali Farokhi Nejad , Mohammad Ali Sahraei , Hesam Kamyab , Kiyanets Aleksandr Valerievich
{"title":"An innovative multi-objective optimization approach for compact concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) column design utilizing lightweight high-strength concrete","authors":"Iman Faridmehr ,&nbsp;Moncef L. Nehdi ,&nbsp;Ali Farokhi Nejad ,&nbsp;Mohammad Ali Sahraei ,&nbsp;Hesam Kamyab ,&nbsp;Kiyanets Aleksandr Valerievich","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlmm.2024.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Incorporating sustainability into Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular (CFST) columns' optimization can enhance efficiency and sustainability in construction. Discrepancies in international standards for ultimate load capacity computation in compact CFST columns under eccentric loading, particularly with lightweight high-strength concrete, pose challenges. This research compile a dataset of compact CFST columns, evaluating design codes (AISC 360-16, Eurocode 4) against experimental results. Besides, a comprehensive finite-element model predicts compact CFST column performance, investigating axial force-moment (P-M) interaction behavior with respect to the material strength ratio (<span><math><mrow><msub><mi>f</mi><mi>y</mi></msub></mrow></math></span><em>/</em><span><math><mrow><msubsup><mi>f</mi><mi>c</mi><mo>′</mo></msubsup></mrow></math></span>). In the second phase of the study, an ANN model, incorporating input parameters, estimates axial load capacity, facilitating multi-objective optimization for optimal CFST column geometry. The results confirmed that Eurocode 4 outperforms AISC 360-16 in experimental axial capacity predictions (<span><math><mrow><msub><mi>N</mi><mrow><mi>u</mi><mi>c</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span>/<span><math><mrow><msub><mi>N</mi><mrow><mi>u</mi><mi>c</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>t</mi><mi>h</mi><mi>e</mi><mi>o</mi><mi>r</mi><mi>e</mi><mi>t</mi><mi>i</mi><mi>c</mi><mi>a</mi><mi>l</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span>) where, the mean and standard deviation for Eurocode 4 were estimated at 1.07 and 0.22, respectively, compared to 1.21 and 0.29 for AISC 360-16. Besides, statistical metrics confirm the precision of the ANN model, particularly with high-strength concrete, promising efficiency in future computational intelligence-based structural design platforms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52306,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588840424000106/pdfft?md5=c71e9629a4b05c1af181dd00b5bae1dc&pid=1-s2.0-S2588840424000106-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588840424000106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Incorporating sustainability into Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular (CFST) columns' optimization can enhance efficiency and sustainability in construction. Discrepancies in international standards for ultimate load capacity computation in compact CFST columns under eccentric loading, particularly with lightweight high-strength concrete, pose challenges. This research compile a dataset of compact CFST columns, evaluating design codes (AISC 360-16, Eurocode 4) against experimental results. Besides, a comprehensive finite-element model predicts compact CFST column performance, investigating axial force-moment (P-M) interaction behavior with respect to the material strength ratio (fy/fc). In the second phase of the study, an ANN model, incorporating input parameters, estimates axial load capacity, facilitating multi-objective optimization for optimal CFST column geometry. The results confirmed that Eurocode 4 outperforms AISC 360-16 in experimental axial capacity predictions (Nuc/Nuc,theoretical) where, the mean and standard deviation for Eurocode 4 were estimated at 1.07 and 0.22, respectively, compared to 1.21 and 0.29 for AISC 360-16. Besides, statistical metrics confirm the precision of the ANN model, particularly with high-strength concrete, promising efficiency in future computational intelligence-based structural design platforms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用轻质高强度混凝土进行紧凑型混凝土填充钢管 (CFST) 柱设计的创新多目标优化方法
将可持续性融入混凝土填充钢管(CFST)柱的优化中,可以提高建筑的效率和可持续性。偏心荷载下紧凑型 CFST 柱的极限承载力计算国际标准存在差异,尤其是轻质高强度混凝土,这给研究带来了挑战。本研究汇编了紧凑型 CFST 柱的数据集,根据实验结果评估了设计规范(AISC 360-16、Eurocode 4)。此外,一个全面的有限元模型预测了紧凑型 CFST 柱的性能,研究了与材料强度比(fy/fc′)相关的轴力-力矩(P-M)相互作用行为。在研究的第二阶段,一个包含输入参数的 ANN 模型估算了轴向承载能力,从而促进了 CFST 柱最佳几何形状的多目标优化。结果证实,Eurocode 4 在实验轴向承载力预测(Nuc/Nuc,理论值)方面优于 AISC 360-16,Eurocode 4 的平均值和标准偏差分别为 1.07 和 0.22,而 AISC 360-16 的平均值和标准偏差分别为 1.21 和 0.29。此外,统计指标证实了 ANN 模型的精确性,尤其是在高强度混凝土方面,有望在未来基于计算智能的结构设计平台中发挥高效作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture
International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
48 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Modeling and investigation of combined processes of casting, rolling, and extrusion to produce electrical wire from alloys Al–Zr system Characteristics of phases and processing techniques of high entropy alloys Editorial Board Microstructural, Electrochemical, and Hot Corrosion Analysis of CoCrFeCuTi High Entropy Alloy Reinforced Titanium Matrix Composites synthesized by Microwave Sintering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1