Analyzing clinical laboratory specimen rejection rates at a specialized hospital in Ethiopia: A 2-year document review.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY American journal of clinical pathology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1093/ajcp/aqae019
Teshiwal Deress, Yeshewas Abebaw, Yezena Esayas, Semegn Nebertu, Meseret Kinidie, Germaw Abebe, Biruk Bayleyegn
{"title":"Analyzing clinical laboratory specimen rejection rates at a specialized hospital in Ethiopia: A 2-year document review.","authors":"Teshiwal Deress, Yeshewas Abebaw, Yezena Esayas, Semegn Nebertu, Meseret Kinidie, Germaw Abebe, Biruk Bayleyegn","doi":"10.1093/ajcp/aqae019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Accurate laboratory diagnosis is essential for effective patient care, but the rejection of specimens within laboratories can have serious consequences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted from September to November 2021 at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital laboratory. Two years of laboratory data were collected from laboratory log books and analyzed to determine trends in specimen rejection rates and identify potential reasons for those rejections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 114,439 specimens, of which 786 (0.70%) were rejected. The hematology service exhibited the highest rejection rate, at 273 (0.2%). The main reasons for specimen rejection were specimens without requests or requests without specimens (40.2%), poor smear preparation (12.3%), clotted specimens (11.3%), and labeling problems (8.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study emphasized a significant incidence of specimen rejection, particularly in the hematology laboratory, underscoring the need for immediate implementation of corrective actions and preventive measures. Furthermore, conducting comprehensive larger-scale studies is recommended to deepen our understanding of and investigate the specific factors contributing to specimen rejection in greater detail.</p>","PeriodicalId":7506,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqae019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Accurate laboratory diagnosis is essential for effective patient care, but the rejection of specimens within laboratories can have serious consequences.

Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted from September to November 2021 at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital laboratory. Two years of laboratory data were collected from laboratory log books and analyzed to determine trends in specimen rejection rates and identify potential reasons for those rejections.

Results: We analyzed 114,439 specimens, of which 786 (0.70%) were rejected. The hematology service exhibited the highest rejection rate, at 273 (0.2%). The main reasons for specimen rejection were specimens without requests or requests without specimens (40.2%), poor smear preparation (12.3%), clotted specimens (11.3%), and labeling problems (8.0%).

Conclusions: This study emphasized a significant incidence of specimen rejection, particularly in the hematology laboratory, underscoring the need for immediate implementation of corrective actions and preventive measures. Furthermore, conducting comprehensive larger-scale studies is recommended to deepen our understanding of and investigate the specific factors contributing to specimen rejection in greater detail.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析埃塞俄比亚一家专科医院的临床实验室标本排斥率:两年文件回顾。
目的准确的实验室诊断对有效的患者护理至关重要,但实验室内标本的拒收可能会造成严重后果:2021 年 9 月至 11 月,在贡德尔大学综合专科医院实验室进行了一项回顾性横断面研究。我们从实验室记录本中收集了两年的实验室数据,并对其进行了分析,以确定标本拒收率的趋势,并找出拒收标本的潜在原因:我们分析了 114439 份标本,其中 786 份(0.70%)被拒收。血液学服务的标本拒收率最高,为 273 份(0.2%)。标本被拒的主要原因是标本无申请或申请无标本(40.2%)、涂片准备不充分(12.3%)、标本凝块(11.3%)和标签问题(8.0%):这项研究强调了标本拒收的严重性,尤其是在血液学实验室中,这突出表明有必要立即采取纠正措施和预防措施。此外,建议开展更大规模的综合研究,以加深我们对造成标本排斥的具体因素的了解和更详细的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Clinical Pathology (AJCP) is the official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pathology and the Academy of Clinical Laboratory Physicians and Scientists. It is a leading international journal for publication of articles concerning novel anatomic pathology and laboratory medicine observations on human disease. AJCP emphasizes articles that focus on the application of evolving technologies for the diagnosis and characterization of diseases and conditions, as well as those that have a direct link toward improving patient care.
期刊最新文献
Culture and other direct detection methods to diagnose human granulocytic anaplasmosis. Validation of monocyte CD169 expression as a valuable rapid diagnostic marker of SARS-CoV-2 and other acute viral infections. Site-discordant expression of myeloid cell nuclear differentiation antigen in blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm. Epstein-Barr virus–positive, primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma, with transformation: Case report and review of the literature RhD-positive red blood cell allocation practice to RhD-negative patients before and during the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1