{"title":"Die Zerstörung der Demokratie: Österreich März 1933 bis Februar 1934 ed. by Bernhard Hachleitner et al (review)","authors":"Vincent Kling","doi":"10.1353/oas.2024.a921913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Die Zerstörung der Demokratie: Österreich März 1933 bis Februar 1934</em> ed. by Bernhard Hachleitner et al <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Vincent Kling </li> </ul> Bernhard Hachleitner, Alfred Pfoser, Katharina Prager, and Werner Michael Schwarz, eds., <em>Die Zerstörung der Demokratie: Österreich März 1933 bis Februar 1934</em>. Wienbibliothek im Rathaus and Wien Museum. Vienna: Residenz Verlag, 2023. 328 pp. <p>If each generation gravitates toward the history enacting the closest parallels to its present, it is no wonder that the erosion—nay, the destruction of democracy by small stages—occupies the mind of present-day historians. The short Austrian Civil War of February 1934 has always intrigued commentators, and there is no dearth of literary and journalistic records about those few ominous days. Anthologies like Februar 1934: Schriftsteller erzählen, edited by Ulrich Weinzierl or Im Kältefieber: Februargeschichten 1934, edited by Erich Hackl and Evelyne Polt-Heinzl, offer vivid and harrowing accounts of the days that solidified Fascist rule in Austria. And while historians working from a more discipline-specific approach have written illuminating accounts of the civil war and the time leading up to it, the edited volume Die Zerstörung der Demokratie, the catalogue of a large-scale exhibition, will for a long time serve as the indispensable source covering every aspect of the topic, thanks to its slow, steady, all-encompassing and chronological datelining of events; its painstaking source documentation; its inclusion of every aspect from popular culture to the arts to legislation to personalities; its lively and mercifully jargon-free writing; and its unprecedented wealth of graphics—photographs, posters, drawings, graphs, reproductions of newspaper pages, many seemingly published here for the first time.</p> <p>From the very first, parallels with the world of 2023 are made explicit. In their foreword (11), Matti Bunzl, director of the Wien Museum, and Anita Eichinger, director of the Wienbibliothek im Rathaus, note that ninety years after the event “berichten Gymnasial- und Universitätslehrer*innen, dass die meisten ihrer Schüler*innen und Student*innen mit dem Namen Engelbert Dollfuß wenig bis gar nichts anfangen können [. . .].” If this statement implies that those who do not remember history are bound to repeat it, the point is made very clear in the next paragraph: “Denn die autoritäre Versuchung ist in unserer politischen Gegenwart angekommen. Auf nahezu allen Kontinenten greifen Regierungen zwecks Machterhalts in die Gelenkstellen der Demokratie ein”—what American reader would fail to connect these words with events in the United States since 2016? <strong>[End Page 131]</strong></p> <p>The end of the volume as well, in the short fifth section, “Debatte” (313–21), specifically links the events of 1933–1934 to the present day in a discussion titled “Playbook des Autokratismus.” Hungary and Poland are mentioned, but the danger is more widespread. To keep to one topic for now, that of gender and sexuality touching on women’s rights, Stefan Benedik writes: “Alle reaktionären und faschistischen Bewegungen dieser Zeit in Europa haben extrem reaktionäre Geschlechterbilder gemeinsam und den vermeintlichen Schutz der Familie als ‘Keimzelle der Nation’ [. . .]” (316). In Europe only? And what time period is under discussion when present and past fuse with such frightening congruence? Veronika Helfert’s chapter “Der Kampf um die Moderne: wider die Säkularisierung und Demokratisierung von Sexualmoral, Familienverhältnissen und Erziehung” (50–65) could be taken from today’s debates, including the powerful poster (60) calling for women to rally against new attempts in 1933 to outlaw abortion. Likewise, Gabriella Hauch’s “Frauen unter Druck: Rekatholisierung—(Re) Maskulinisierung—Frauendiskriminerung” (66–71) shows the entire dynamic of today’s evangelism brought to bear on sex and gender roles, personal autonomy, and reproductive rights.</p> <p>This one area is part of a full narrative divided into five sections. After the foreword and introduction (12–17), five large parts move in order through the year in question. Part 1, “Die Demokratie unter Druck” (19–71), is a kind of prefiguration, tracing the first serious but not yet fatal attacks. The extensive Part 2, “Die Schritte der Zerstörung” (72–245), traces the march of restored censorship after Parliament was dissolved, the emergency decrees issued by Dollfuss, the suppression of the press, the restoration of the death penalty, the arrests and...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":40350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Austrian Studies","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Austrian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/oas.2024.a921913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:
Reviewed by:
Die Zerstörung der Demokratie: Österreich März 1933 bis Februar 1934 ed. by Bernhard Hachleitner et al
Vincent Kling
Bernhard Hachleitner, Alfred Pfoser, Katharina Prager, and Werner Michael Schwarz, eds., Die Zerstörung der Demokratie: Österreich März 1933 bis Februar 1934. Wienbibliothek im Rathaus and Wien Museum. Vienna: Residenz Verlag, 2023. 328 pp.
If each generation gravitates toward the history enacting the closest parallels to its present, it is no wonder that the erosion—nay, the destruction of democracy by small stages—occupies the mind of present-day historians. The short Austrian Civil War of February 1934 has always intrigued commentators, and there is no dearth of literary and journalistic records about those few ominous days. Anthologies like Februar 1934: Schriftsteller erzählen, edited by Ulrich Weinzierl or Im Kältefieber: Februargeschichten 1934, edited by Erich Hackl and Evelyne Polt-Heinzl, offer vivid and harrowing accounts of the days that solidified Fascist rule in Austria. And while historians working from a more discipline-specific approach have written illuminating accounts of the civil war and the time leading up to it, the edited volume Die Zerstörung der Demokratie, the catalogue of a large-scale exhibition, will for a long time serve as the indispensable source covering every aspect of the topic, thanks to its slow, steady, all-encompassing and chronological datelining of events; its painstaking source documentation; its inclusion of every aspect from popular culture to the arts to legislation to personalities; its lively and mercifully jargon-free writing; and its unprecedented wealth of graphics—photographs, posters, drawings, graphs, reproductions of newspaper pages, many seemingly published here for the first time.
From the very first, parallels with the world of 2023 are made explicit. In their foreword (11), Matti Bunzl, director of the Wien Museum, and Anita Eichinger, director of the Wienbibliothek im Rathaus, note that ninety years after the event “berichten Gymnasial- und Universitätslehrer*innen, dass die meisten ihrer Schüler*innen und Student*innen mit dem Namen Engelbert Dollfuß wenig bis gar nichts anfangen können [. . .].” If this statement implies that those who do not remember history are bound to repeat it, the point is made very clear in the next paragraph: “Denn die autoritäre Versuchung ist in unserer politischen Gegenwart angekommen. Auf nahezu allen Kontinenten greifen Regierungen zwecks Machterhalts in die Gelenkstellen der Demokratie ein”—what American reader would fail to connect these words with events in the United States since 2016? [End Page 131]
The end of the volume as well, in the short fifth section, “Debatte” (313–21), specifically links the events of 1933–1934 to the present day in a discussion titled “Playbook des Autokratismus.” Hungary and Poland are mentioned, but the danger is more widespread. To keep to one topic for now, that of gender and sexuality touching on women’s rights, Stefan Benedik writes: “Alle reaktionären und faschistischen Bewegungen dieser Zeit in Europa haben extrem reaktionäre Geschlechterbilder gemeinsam und den vermeintlichen Schutz der Familie als ‘Keimzelle der Nation’ [. . .]” (316). In Europe only? And what time period is under discussion when present and past fuse with such frightening congruence? Veronika Helfert’s chapter “Der Kampf um die Moderne: wider die Säkularisierung und Demokratisierung von Sexualmoral, Familienverhältnissen und Erziehung” (50–65) could be taken from today’s debates, including the powerful poster (60) calling for women to rally against new attempts in 1933 to outlaw abortion. Likewise, Gabriella Hauch’s “Frauen unter Druck: Rekatholisierung—(Re) Maskulinisierung—Frauendiskriminerung” (66–71) shows the entire dynamic of today’s evangelism brought to bear on sex and gender roles, personal autonomy, and reproductive rights.
This one area is part of a full narrative divided into five sections. After the foreword and introduction (12–17), five large parts move in order through the year in question. Part 1, “Die Demokratie unter Druck” (19–71), is a kind of prefiguration, tracing the first serious but not yet fatal attacks. The extensive Part 2, “Die Schritte der Zerstörung” (72–245), traces the march of restored censorship after Parliament was dissolved, the emergency decrees issued by Dollfuss, the suppression of the press, the restoration of the death penalty, the arrests and...
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 Die Zerstörung der Demokratie:Österreich März 1933 bis Februar 1934 ed. by Bernhard Hachleitner et al Vincent Kling Bernhard Hachleitner, Alfred Pfoser, Katharina Prager, and Werner Michael Schwarz, eds., Die Zerstörung der Demokratie:Österreich März 1933 bis Februar 1934.Wienbibliothek im Rathaus and Wien Museum.维也纳:Residenz Verlag, 2023.328 pp.如果说每一代人都倾向于与当代人最相似的历史,那么民主的侵蚀--或者说分阶段的毁灭--就难怪会占据当今历史学家的头脑。1934 年 2 月短暂的奥地利内战一直吸引着评论家的目光,有关那几天不祥的文学和新闻记录并不缺乏。1934 年 2 月》等文集:Ulrich Weinzierl 编辑的《Schriftsteller erzählen 》或《Im Kältefieber:Erich Hackl 和 Evelyne Polt-Heinzl 编辑的《1934 年 2 月:作家回忆》等文集,生动而令人痛心地描述了巩固奥地利法西斯统治的那段日子。尽管历史学家们从更具体的学科角度出发,对内战和内战前的时间进行了富有启发性的描述,但作为大型展览目录的《民主的崩溃》(Die Zerstörung der Demokratie)一书,由于其缓慢、稳定、全面和按时间顺序排列的事件,将在很长一段时间内成为涵盖该主题各个方面的不可或缺的资料来源;煞费苦心的资料整理;从大众文化到艺术,从立法到人物的方方面面;生动活泼而又不失专业术语的写作;以及前所未有的大量图表--照片、海报、图画、图表、报纸版面复制品,其中许多似乎是首次在此出版。从一开始,该书就明确提出了与 2023 年世界的相似之处。维也纳博物馆馆长 Matti Bunzl 和 Wienbibliothek im Rathaus 馆长 Anita Eichinger 在他们的前言 (11) 中指出,事件发生九十年后,"Gymnasial- und Universitätslehrer*innen, dass die meisten ihrer Schüler*innen und Student*innen mit dem dem Namen Engelbert Dollfuß wenig bis gar nichts anfangen können [. . ]"。如果这句话的意思是说,不牢记历史的人必然会重蹈覆辙,那么下一段话就非常清楚地说明了这一点:"Denn die autoritäre Versuchung ist in unserer politischen Gegenwart angekommen.Auf nahezu allen Kontinenten greifen Regierungen zwecks Machterhalts in die Gelenkstellen der Demokratie ein"--哪个美国读者会不把这些话与 2016 年以来美国发生的事件联系起来呢?[第 131 页末]在卷末短短的第五部分 "辩论"(313-21)中,题为 "自决主义游戏手册 "的讨论特别将 1933-1934 年的事件与当今联系起来。其中提到了匈牙利和波兰,但危险更为广泛。Stefan Benedik 写道:"欧洲时代的所有革命和法西斯主义运动都将极端革命性的家庭视为'民族的基石'[......]",他暂时只谈一个话题,即涉及妇女权利的性别和性问题。(316).只在欧洲?当现在和过去以如此可怕的一致性融合在一起时,我们讨论的是哪个时期?Veronika Helfert 的章节 "Der Kampf um die Moderne: wider die Säkularisierung und Demokratisierung von Sexualmoral, Familienverhältnissen und Erziehung"(50-65)可以取材于今天的辩论,包括呼吁妇女团结起来反对 1933 年非法堕胎新尝试的有力海报(60)。同样,Gabriella Hauch 的 "Frauen unter Druck:Rekatholisierung-(Re)Maskulinisierung-Frauendiskriminerung"(66-71)展示了当今福音派在性与性别角色、个人自主权和生育权方面的整体动态。这一个方面是分为五个部分的完整叙述的一部分。在前言和导言(12-17)之后,五大部分依次讲述了有关年份的情况。第一部分 "Die Demokratie unter Druck"(19-71)是一种预示,描写了最初的严重但尚未致命的攻击。内容广泛的第二部分 "Die Schritte der Zerstörung"(72-245)追溯了议会解散后恢复审查制度的进程、多尔福斯颁布的紧急法令、对新闻界的镇压、死刑的恢复、逮捕和...
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Austrian Studies is an interdisciplinary quarterly that publishes scholarly articles and book reviews on all aspects of the history and culture of Austria, Austro-Hungary, and the Habsburg territory. It is the flagship publication of the Austrian Studies Association and contains contributions in German and English from the world''s premiere scholars in the field of Austrian studies. The journal highlights scholarly work that draws on innovative methodologies and new ways of viewing Austrian history and culture. Although the journal was renamed in 2012 to reflect the increasing scope and diversity of its scholarship, it has a long lineage dating back over a half century as Modern Austrian Literature and, prior to that, The Journal of the International Arthur Schnitzler Research Association.