Development and validation of claims-based algorithms for identifying hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and their severity in 2020 and 2021

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-03-09 DOI:10.2188/jea.je20230285
Chieko Ishiguro, Wataru Mimura, Junko Terada, Nobuaki Matsunaga, Hironori Ishiwari, Hiroyuki Hoshimoto, Kengo Miyo, Norio Ohmagari
{"title":"Development and validation of claims-based algorithms for identifying hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and their severity in 2020 and 2021","authors":"Chieko Ishiguro, Wataru Mimura, Junko Terada, Nobuaki Matsunaga, Hironori Ishiwari, Hiroyuki Hoshimoto, Kengo Miyo, Norio Ohmagari","doi":"10.2188/jea.je20230285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"</p><p><b>Background:</b> This study aimed to develop and validate claims-based algorithms for identifying hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and the disease severity.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> We used claims data including all patients at the National Center for Global and Medicine Hospital between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021. The claims-based algorithms for three statuses with COVID-19 (hospitalizations, moderate or higher status, and severe status) were developed using diagnosis codes (ICD-10 code: U07.1, B34.2) and relevant medical procedure code. True cases were determined using the COVID-19 inpatient registry and electronic health records. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for each algorithm at 6-month intervals.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Of the 75,711 total patients, number of true cases was 1,192 for hospitalizations, 622 for moderate or higher status, and 55 for severe status. The diagnosis code-only algorithm for hospitalization had sensitivities 90.4% to 94.9% and PPVs 9.3% to 19.4%. Among the algorithms consisting of both diagnosis codes and procedure codes, high sensitivity and PPV were observed during the following periods; 93.9% and 97.1% for hospitalization (January-June 2021), 90.4% and 87.5% for moderate or higher status (July-December 2021), and 92.3% and 85.7% for severe status (July-December 2020), respectively. Almost all algorithms had specificities and NPVs of approximately 99%.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> The diagnosis code-only algorithm for COVID-19 hospitalization showed low validity throughout the study period. The algorithms for hospitalizations, moderate or higher status, and severe status with COVID-19, consisting of both diagnosis codes and procedure codes, showed high validity in some periods.</p>\n<p></p>","PeriodicalId":15799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.je20230285","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to develop and validate claims-based algorithms for identifying hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and the disease severity.

Methods: We used claims data including all patients at the National Center for Global and Medicine Hospital between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021. The claims-based algorithms for three statuses with COVID-19 (hospitalizations, moderate or higher status, and severe status) were developed using diagnosis codes (ICD-10 code: U07.1, B34.2) and relevant medical procedure code. True cases were determined using the COVID-19 inpatient registry and electronic health records. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for each algorithm at 6-month intervals.

Results: Of the 75,711 total patients, number of true cases was 1,192 for hospitalizations, 622 for moderate or higher status, and 55 for severe status. The diagnosis code-only algorithm for hospitalization had sensitivities 90.4% to 94.9% and PPVs 9.3% to 19.4%. Among the algorithms consisting of both diagnosis codes and procedure codes, high sensitivity and PPV were observed during the following periods; 93.9% and 97.1% for hospitalization (January-June 2021), 90.4% and 87.5% for moderate or higher status (July-December 2021), and 92.3% and 85.7% for severe status (July-December 2020), respectively. Almost all algorithms had specificities and NPVs of approximately 99%.

Conclusions: The diagnosis code-only algorithm for COVID-19 hospitalization showed low validity throughout the study period. The algorithms for hospitalizations, moderate or higher status, and severe status with COVID-19, consisting of both diagnosis codes and procedure codes, showed high validity in some periods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发并验证基于报销单的算法,用于识别 2020 年和 2021 年 COVID-19 住院患者及其严重程度
背景:本研究旨在开发基于索赔的算法,用于识别冠状病毒疾病(COVID-19)住院患者和疾病严重程度:本研究旨在开发和验证基于报销单的算法,用于识别冠状病毒病(COVID-19)住院患者和疾病严重程度:我们使用的理赔数据包括 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日期间国家全球医学中心医院的所有患者。使用诊断代码(ICD-10 代码:U07.1、B34.2)和相关医疗程序代码,针对 COVID-19 的三种状态(住院、中度或更高状态和重度状态)制定了基于索赔的算法。真实病例通过 COVID-19 住院病人登记表和电子病历确定。以 6 个月为间隔计算每种算法的灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值 (PPV) 和阴性预测值 (NPV):在 75,711 名患者中,真正的住院病例数为 1,192 例,中度或更严重病例数为 622 例,严重病例数为 55 例。仅使用诊断代码的住院算法灵敏度为 90.4% 至 94.9%,PPV 为 9.3% 至 19.4%。在由诊断代码和手术代码组成的算法中,以下时段的灵敏度和 PPV 较高:住院(2021 年 1 月至 6 月)分别为 93.9% 和 97.1%,中度或更高状态(2021 年 7 月至 12 月)分别为 90.4% 和 87.5%,重度状态(2020 年 7 月至 12 月)分别为 92.3% 和 85.7%。几乎所有算法的特异性和净现值都在 99% 左右:结论:在整个研究期间,COVID-19 住院的纯诊断代码算法显示出较低的有效性。由诊断代码和手术代码组成的 COVID-19 住院、中度或更高状态和重度状态算法在某些时期显示出较高的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Epidemiology
Journal of Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
172
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Epidemiology is the official open access scientific journal of the Japan Epidemiological Association. The Journal publishes a broad range of original research on epidemiology as it relates to human health, and aims to promote communication among those engaged in the field of epidemiological research and those who use epidemiological findings.
期刊最新文献
Changes in dietary diversity and subsequent all-cause and cause-specific mortality among Japanese adults: The Japan Collaborative Cohort Study. Response to the Letter Regarding "Paternal involvement in childcare and housework and mothers' spanking behavior: The Japanese longitudinal survey of newborns in the 21st century". Validation of Self-reported Medical Condition in the Taiwan Biobank. Mortality After Partner's Cancer Diagnosis or Death: A Population-based Prospective Cohort Study in Japan. Non-cancer-related Deaths in Cancer Survivors: A Nationwide Population-based Study in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1