Iron status in a representative sample of US pregnant women is not associated with pre-pregnancy BMI: results from the NHANES (1999-2010) study

Kelly Gallagher, Mihaela A Ciulei, Djibril Ba, Celeste Beck, Ruth A Pobee, Alison D Gernand, Rachel Walker
{"title":"Iron status in a representative sample of US pregnant women is not associated with pre-pregnancy BMI: results from the NHANES (1999-2010) study","authors":"Kelly Gallagher, Mihaela A Ciulei, Djibril Ba, Celeste Beck, Ruth A Pobee, Alison D Gernand, Rachel Walker","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.07.24303958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Iron deficiency in pregnancy is related to many poor health outcomes, including anemia and low birth weight. A small number of previous studies have identified maternal body mass index (BMI) as potential risk factors for poor iron status. Our objective was to examine the association between pre-pregnancy BMI and iron status in a nationally representative sample of US adult women. We used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES; 1999-2010) for pregnant women ages 18-49 years (n=1156). BMI (kg/m2) was calculated using pre-pregnancy weight (self-reported) and height (measured at examination). Iron deficiency (ID) was defined as total body iron (calculated from serum ferritin and transferrin receptor using Cook’s equation) < 0 mg/kg and anemia as hemoglobin < 11 g/dL. Associations were examined using weighted Poisson regression models, adjusted for confounders (age, race/ethnicity, education, family income, and trimester). Approximately 14% of pregnant women had ID and 8% had anemia in this sample. There were no differences in the prevalence of ID or anemia in women with pre-pregnancy overweight and obesity (ID: overweight, adjusted prevalence ratio (PR)=1.28, 95%CI: 0.89-1.83; obesity, PR=0.75, 95%CI: 0.39-1.45; anemia: overweight, PR=1.08, 95%CI: 0.53-2.19; obesity, PR=0.99, 95%CI: 0.49-2.01) compared to women with a normal BMI. Findings from these US nationally representative data indicate that iron status in pregnancy does not differ by pre-pregnancy BMI. Since iron deficiency during pregnancy remains a significant public health concern, NHANES should consider measuring current iron status in upcoming cycles.","PeriodicalId":501073,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Nutrition","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.07.24303958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Iron deficiency in pregnancy is related to many poor health outcomes, including anemia and low birth weight. A small number of previous studies have identified maternal body mass index (BMI) as potential risk factors for poor iron status. Our objective was to examine the association between pre-pregnancy BMI and iron status in a nationally representative sample of US adult women. We used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES; 1999-2010) for pregnant women ages 18-49 years (n=1156). BMI (kg/m2) was calculated using pre-pregnancy weight (self-reported) and height (measured at examination). Iron deficiency (ID) was defined as total body iron (calculated from serum ferritin and transferrin receptor using Cook’s equation) < 0 mg/kg and anemia as hemoglobin < 11 g/dL. Associations were examined using weighted Poisson regression models, adjusted for confounders (age, race/ethnicity, education, family income, and trimester). Approximately 14% of pregnant women had ID and 8% had anemia in this sample. There were no differences in the prevalence of ID or anemia in women with pre-pregnancy overweight and obesity (ID: overweight, adjusted prevalence ratio (PR)=1.28, 95%CI: 0.89-1.83; obesity, PR=0.75, 95%CI: 0.39-1.45; anemia: overweight, PR=1.08, 95%CI: 0.53-2.19; obesity, PR=0.99, 95%CI: 0.49-2.01) compared to women with a normal BMI. Findings from these US nationally representative data indicate that iron status in pregnancy does not differ by pre-pregnancy BMI. Since iron deficiency during pregnancy remains a significant public health concern, NHANES should consider measuring current iron status in upcoming cycles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有代表性的美国孕妇样本中的铁状况与孕前体重指数无关:NHANES(1999-2010 年)研究的结果
孕期缺铁与许多不良健康后果有关,包括贫血和出生体重不足。之前有少数研究发现,孕产妇体重指数(BMI)是导致铁状况不佳的潜在风险因素。我们的目的是在具有全国代表性的美国成年女性样本中研究孕前体重指数与铁状况之间的关系。我们使用了美国国家健康与营养调查(NHANES,1999-2010 年)中 18-49 岁孕妇的数据(n=1156)。体重指数(BMI)(kg/m2)根据孕前体重(自我报告)和身高(检查时测量)计算得出。铁缺乏症(ID)的定义为体内总铁(根据血清铁蛋白和转铁蛋白受体,采用库克方程计算)< 0 mg/kg,贫血为血红蛋白< 11 g/dL。在对混杂因素(年龄、种族/民族、教育程度、家庭收入和孕期)进行调整后,使用加权泊松回归模型对相关性进行了检验。在该样本中,约 14% 的孕妇患有 ID,8% 的孕妇患有贫血。与体重指数正常的妇女相比,孕前超重和肥胖妇女的 ID 或贫血患病率没有差异(ID:超重,调整患病率比 (PR)=1.28,95%CI:0.89-1.83;肥胖,PR=0.75,95%CI:0.39-1.45;贫血:超重,PR=1.08,95%CI:0.53-2.19;肥胖,PR=0.99,95%CI:0.49-2.01)。这些具有美国全国代表性的数据表明,孕期铁的状况并不因孕前体重指数的不同而有所差异。由于孕期缺铁仍然是一个重要的公共健康问题,NHANES 应考虑在下一个周期中测量当前的铁状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Randomized dose–response trial of n–3 fatty acids in hormone receptor negative breast cancer survivors—impact on breast adipose oxylipin and DNA methylation patterns Advertising ultra-processed foods around urban and rural schools in Kenya Estimated morbimortality and costs attributable to child and adolescent obesity in Brazil from 2024 to 2060: a multistate life table study Integrating co-design into formative research for a SBCC entry-point platform for nutrition-sensitive social protection programs in low -and middle-income country settings. A Qualitative Study on Food Taboos Among Rural Pregnant Women in Bangladesh: Motivators for Adherence and Influencers of Taboo-Breaking Behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1