Effectiveness of wood ash and paper sludge as liming and nutrient sources for annual ryegrass grown in podzolic soils of Newfoundland

Bilal Javed, Yeukai Katanda, Muhammad Nadeem, Thilini Wickremasinghe, Muhammad M. Farhain, Raymond Thomas, Lakshman Galagedara, Xiaobin Guo, Mumtaz Cheema
{"title":"Effectiveness of wood ash and paper sludge as liming and nutrient sources for annual ryegrass grown in podzolic soils of Newfoundland","authors":"Bilal Javed,&nbsp;Yeukai Katanda,&nbsp;Muhammad Nadeem,&nbsp;Thilini Wickremasinghe,&nbsp;Muhammad M. Farhain,&nbsp;Raymond Thomas,&nbsp;Lakshman Galagedara,&nbsp;Xiaobin Guo,&nbsp;Mumtaz Cheema","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The acidic soils of western Newfoundland require liming for successful production of most crops. Locally sourced paper mill waste wood ash (WA) and paper sludge (SL) have potential as cheaper alternatives to limestone (LIME). Two greenhouse experiments evaluated WA and SL as liming and soil conditioning amendments for annual ryegrass (<i>Lolium multiflorum</i>) production. At 55 days after seeding, soil pH in WA (6.2 and 6.3) and wood ash and paper sludge (WASL) (6.0 and 6.3) were not different from that in LIME (6.0 and 6.5) for Experiments 1 and 2, respectively. However, pH in SL was 0.4 and 0.3 points lower than in LIME. Compared to LIME, WA, SL, and WASL produced 31%–52% and 57%–74% greater biomass yield in Experiments 1 and 2, respectively. N uptake was greater in WA (60 and 129 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>) and WASL (51 and 97 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>) compared to LIME (40 and 85 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>), in Experiments 1 and 2, respectively. SL did not differ from LIME in Experiment 1, but reduced N uptake by 57% in Experiment 2. The results show significant potential of WA as an alternative amendment for liming and yield improvement of annual ryegrass grown in NL podzolic soils. However, SL has limited potential due to the risk of increasing N immobilization and residual soil mineral N when growing conditions are limiting. Combining SL with WA or biochar seemed to alleviate these risks. Overall, the adoption of these amendments for field production systems warrants serious consideration, following supplemental field studies to determine optimal application rates and timing.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.20648","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The acidic soils of western Newfoundland require liming for successful production of most crops. Locally sourced paper mill waste wood ash (WA) and paper sludge (SL) have potential as cheaper alternatives to limestone (LIME). Two greenhouse experiments evaluated WA and SL as liming and soil conditioning amendments for annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) production. At 55 days after seeding, soil pH in WA (6.2 and 6.3) and wood ash and paper sludge (WASL) (6.0 and 6.3) were not different from that in LIME (6.0 and 6.5) for Experiments 1 and 2, respectively. However, pH in SL was 0.4 and 0.3 points lower than in LIME. Compared to LIME, WA, SL, and WASL produced 31%–52% and 57%–74% greater biomass yield in Experiments 1 and 2, respectively. N uptake was greater in WA (60 and 129 kg N ha−1) and WASL (51 and 97 kg N ha−1) compared to LIME (40 and 85 kg N ha−1), in Experiments 1 and 2, respectively. SL did not differ from LIME in Experiment 1, but reduced N uptake by 57% in Experiment 2. The results show significant potential of WA as an alternative amendment for liming and yield improvement of annual ryegrass grown in NL podzolic soils. However, SL has limited potential due to the risk of increasing N immobilization and residual soil mineral N when growing conditions are limiting. Combining SL with WA or biochar seemed to alleviate these risks. Overall, the adoption of these amendments for field production systems warrants serious consideration, following supplemental field studies to determine optimal application rates and timing.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
木灰和造纸污泥作为纽芬兰荚膜土壤中生长的一年生黑麦草的石灰和营养源的有效性
纽芬兰西部的酸性土壤需要进行石灰化处理,才能成功种植大多数作物。当地的造纸厂废木灰(WA)和造纸污泥(SL)有可能成为石灰石(LIME)的廉价替代品。两项温室实验对 WA 和 SL 作为一年生黑麦草(Lolium multiflorum)生产的石灰和土壤改良剂进行了评估。在实验 1 和 2 中,播种后 55 天,WA(6.2 和 6.3)和木灰与造纸污泥(WASL)(6.0 和 6.3)的土壤 pH 值分别与 LIME(6.0 和 6.5)无异。不过,SL 的 pH 值分别比 LIME 低 0.4 和 0.3 点。与 LIME 相比,在实验 1 和 2 中,WA、SL 和 WASL 的生物量产量分别高出 31%-52% 和 57%-74%。在实验 1 和 2 中,与 LIME(每公顷 40 和 85 千克氮)相比,WA(每公顷 60 和 129 千克氮)和 WASL(每公顷 51 和 97 千克氮)的氮吸收量更大。在实验 1 中,SL 与 LIME 没有差异,但在实验 2 中,SL 的氮吸收量减少了 57%。实验结果表明,WA 作为一种替代性改良剂,对生长在北大西洋荚膜土壤中的一年生黑麦草的石灰化和产量提高具有巨大潜力。然而,可溶性钾的潜力有限,因为当生长条件受限时,可溶性钾有可能增加氮的固定性和土壤矿物氮的残留量。将 SL 与 WA 或生物炭结合使用似乎可以减轻这些风险。总之,在田间生产系统中采用这些改良剂值得认真考虑,但要先进行补充性田间研究,以确定最佳施用率和施用时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Proceedings of the 14th North American Forest Soils Conference Soil chemical properties affecting grain yield and oil content of crambe biofuel crop Particulate organic carbon and nitrogen and soil-test biological activity under grazed pastures and conservation land uses Determining microbial metabolic limitation under the influence of moss patch size from soil extracellular enzyme stoichiometry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1