Effectiveness and clinical relevance of kinesio taping in musculoskeletal disorders: A protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and evidence mapping

Qingcong Mo, Siqi Xu, Fangfei Hu, Xiaoyan Zheng
{"title":"Effectiveness and clinical relevance of kinesio taping in musculoskeletal disorders: A protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and evidence mapping","authors":"Qingcong Mo, Siqi Xu, Fangfei Hu, Xiaoyan Zheng","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.07.24303944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Kinesio taping (KT) has been extensively applied in the management of musculoskeletal disorders. Although plentiful systematic reviews (SRs) have evaluated its efficacy, there are no convincing conclusions due to disperse and inconclusive results, and its clinical relevance remains unclear. Hence, there is a need to summarise all the SRs for the comprehensive and consistent evidence. This overview aims to appraise the overall effectiveness of KT in musculoskeletal disorders, and provide evidence maps to visualise the findings. Method and analysis\nElectronic databases (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, Embase, Epistemonikos, PEDro, Scopus, ISI Web of Science) and reference lists will be searched from inception to September 2024 for the SRs of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The SRs involving comparisons of the effectiveness between single or adjunctive KT and other interventions for patients with musculoskeletal disorders will be included. The primary and additional outcome to be considered will be the core outcome set, and the patient-reported outcome measure and patient-important outcome, respectively. Two reviewers will independently screen and select studies, extract the data, and evaluate the reporting and methodological quality of eligible SRs as well as the risk of bias of included RCTs. For the SRs without meta-analysis, we will collate the number of RCTs that showed any differences in outcomes. For the SRs with meta-analysis, we will provide the original summary of evidence (e.g., pooled effects and heterogeneity) for outcomes with an evaluation of missing results and clinical relevance. The certainty of each outcome will be measured, and user-friendly maps of findings will be presented graphically. Ethics and dissemination Formal ethical approval for this study is not required, since the data will be only collected from published literature in public databases. The results will be disseminated in the peer-reviewed academic journal, and relevant datasets will be preserved in the online repository. PROSPERO registration number CRD42024517528","PeriodicalId":501453,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.07.24303944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Kinesio taping (KT) has been extensively applied in the management of musculoskeletal disorders. Although plentiful systematic reviews (SRs) have evaluated its efficacy, there are no convincing conclusions due to disperse and inconclusive results, and its clinical relevance remains unclear. Hence, there is a need to summarise all the SRs for the comprehensive and consistent evidence. This overview aims to appraise the overall effectiveness of KT in musculoskeletal disorders, and provide evidence maps to visualise the findings. Method and analysis Electronic databases (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, Embase, Epistemonikos, PEDro, Scopus, ISI Web of Science) and reference lists will be searched from inception to September 2024 for the SRs of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The SRs involving comparisons of the effectiveness between single or adjunctive KT and other interventions for patients with musculoskeletal disorders will be included. The primary and additional outcome to be considered will be the core outcome set, and the patient-reported outcome measure and patient-important outcome, respectively. Two reviewers will independently screen and select studies, extract the data, and evaluate the reporting and methodological quality of eligible SRs as well as the risk of bias of included RCTs. For the SRs without meta-analysis, we will collate the number of RCTs that showed any differences in outcomes. For the SRs with meta-analysis, we will provide the original summary of evidence (e.g., pooled effects and heterogeneity) for outcomes with an evaluation of missing results and clinical relevance. The certainty of each outcome will be measured, and user-friendly maps of findings will be presented graphically. Ethics and dissemination Formal ethical approval for this study is not required, since the data will be only collected from published literature in public databases. The results will be disseminated in the peer-reviewed academic journal, and relevant datasets will be preserved in the online repository. PROSPERO registration number CRD42024517528
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肌动贴对肌肉骨骼疾病的疗效和临床意义:系统综述和证据图谱协议
引言 肌动贴(KT)已被广泛应用于肌肉骨骼疾病的治疗。虽然大量系统综述(SR)对其疗效进行了评估,但由于结果分散且不确定,因此没有令人信服的结论,其临床相关性仍不明确。因此,有必要对所有的系统综述进行总结,以获得全面、一致的证据。本综述旨在评估 KT 对肌肉骨骼疾病的总体疗效,并提供证据图以直观显示研究结果。方法与分析将检索电子数据库(Cochrane 系统综述数据库、MEDLINE、Embase、Epistemonikos、PEDro、Scopus、ISI Web of Science)和参考文献列表,以获取从开始到 2024 年 9 月的随机对照试验 (RCT) 的 SR。其中将包括对肌肉骨骼疾病患者进行单一或辅助 KT 与其他干预措施的有效性比较的 SR。考虑的主要结果和附加结果将分别为核心结果集、患者报告的结果测量和患者重要结果。两名审稿人将独立筛选研究、提取数据、评估符合条件的SR的报告和方法学质量以及纳入的RCT的偏倚风险。对于未进行荟萃分析的研究报告,我们将核对显示结果存在差异的 RCT 数量。对于有荟萃分析的研究报告,我们将提供结果的原始证据摘要(如集合效应和异质性),并对缺失结果和临床相关性进行评估。我们将对每项结果的确定性进行衡量,并以图形方式展示调查结果的用户友好地图。伦理和传播 本研究无需获得正式的伦理批准,因为数据仅从公共数据库中已发表的文献中收集。研究结果将在同行评审的学术期刊上发布,相关数据集将保存在在线资料库中。PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42024517528
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS: INTERPRETATION OF NON-STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT RESULTS IN RANDOMISED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS IN REHABILITATION Targeted deep brain stimulation of the motor thalamus improves speech and swallowing motor functions after cerebral lesions Normal feeding movements expressed by dimensionality reduction of whole-body joint motions using principal component analysis Impact of early postoperative ambulation on gait recovery after hip fracture surgery: A multicenter cohort study Backward Locomotor Treadmill Training on Walking and Balance Outcomes in Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Clinical Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1