Enhancing gout management by creating a register using automated queries in electronic health records

Nils Burgisser, Denis Mongin, Samia Mehouachi, Clement P Buclin, Romain Guemara, Pauline Darbellay Farhoumand, Olivia Braillard, Kim Lauper, Delphine Sophie Courvoisier
{"title":"Enhancing gout management by creating a register using automated queries in electronic health records","authors":"Nils Burgisser, Denis Mongin, Samia Mehouachi, Clement P Buclin, Romain Guemara, Pauline Darbellay Farhoumand, Olivia Braillard, Kim Lauper, Delphine Sophie Courvoisier","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.08.24303964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To develop an automatic gout register to improve gout management. Methods: We analysed the electronic health records (EHR) of all patients >18 years old from a tertiary academic hospital (2013-2022) based on six criteria: International Classification of Diseases 10 (ICD-10) gout diagnosis, urate-lowering therapy (ULT) prescription, uric acid crystal in joint aspiration and gout-related terms in problem lists, clinical or imaging reports. We assessed the positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) of the query by chart reviews. Results: Of 2,110,902 out- and inpatients, 10,289 had at least one criterion for gout. The combination of joint aspiration OR diagnostic in the problem list OR ≥ 2 other criteria created a register of 5,138 patients, with a PPV of 92.4% (95%CI: 88.5 to 95.0), and an NPV of 94.3% (95%CI: 91.9 to 96.0). PPV and NPV were similar amongst outpatients and inpatients. Incidence was 2.9 per 1000 person-year and dropped by 30% from the COVID-19 pandemic onward. Patients with gout were on average 71.2 years old (SD 14.9), mainly male (76.5%), overweight (69.5%) and polymorbid (mean number of comorbidities of 3, IQR 1-5). More than half (57.4%) had received a urate lowering treatment, 6.7% had a gout that led to a hospitalisation or ≥2 flares within a year, and 32.9% received a rheumatology consultation. Conclusion: An automatic EHR-based gout register is feasible, valid and could be used to evaluate and improve gout management. Interestingly, the register uncovered a marked underdiagnosis or underreporting of gout since the COVID-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":501212,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Rheumatology","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.08.24303964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop an automatic gout register to improve gout management. Methods: We analysed the electronic health records (EHR) of all patients >18 years old from a tertiary academic hospital (2013-2022) based on six criteria: International Classification of Diseases 10 (ICD-10) gout diagnosis, urate-lowering therapy (ULT) prescription, uric acid crystal in joint aspiration and gout-related terms in problem lists, clinical or imaging reports. We assessed the positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) of the query by chart reviews. Results: Of 2,110,902 out- and inpatients, 10,289 had at least one criterion for gout. The combination of joint aspiration OR diagnostic in the problem list OR ≥ 2 other criteria created a register of 5,138 patients, with a PPV of 92.4% (95%CI: 88.5 to 95.0), and an NPV of 94.3% (95%CI: 91.9 to 96.0). PPV and NPV were similar amongst outpatients and inpatients. Incidence was 2.9 per 1000 person-year and dropped by 30% from the COVID-19 pandemic onward. Patients with gout were on average 71.2 years old (SD 14.9), mainly male (76.5%), overweight (69.5%) and polymorbid (mean number of comorbidities of 3, IQR 1-5). More than half (57.4%) had received a urate lowering treatment, 6.7% had a gout that led to a hospitalisation or ≥2 flares within a year, and 32.9% received a rheumatology consultation. Conclusion: An automatic EHR-based gout register is feasible, valid and could be used to evaluate and improve gout management. Interestingly, the register uncovered a marked underdiagnosis or underreporting of gout since the COVID-19 pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用电子病历中的自动查询功能创建登记册,加强痛风管理
目的:开发痛风自动登记系统,改善痛风管理。方法:我们根据六项标准分析了一家三级学术医院所有 18 岁患者的电子健康记录(EHR)(2013-2022 年):国际疾病分类 10(ICD-10)痛风诊断、降尿酸治疗(ULT)处方、关节抽吸中的尿酸结晶以及问题清单、临床或影像报告中与痛风相关的术语。我们通过病历审查评估了查询的阳性预测值和阴性预测值(PPV 和 NPV)。结果:在 2,110,902 名门诊和住院患者中,10,289 人至少有一项痛风标准。结合关节抽吸或问题清单中的诊断或≥2项其他标准,可对5138名患者进行登记,PPV为92.4%(95%CI:88.5-95.0),NPV为94.3%(95%CI:91.9-96.0)。门诊病人和住院病人的 PPV 和 NPV 相似。发病率为每千人年2.9例,从COVID-19大流行开始下降了30%。痛风患者平均年龄为 71.2 岁(SD 14.9),主要为男性(76.5%)、超重(69.5%)和多病(平均合并症数为 3,IQR 1-5)。半数以上(57.4%)的患者曾接受过降低尿酸盐的治疗,6.7%的患者曾因痛风住院或在一年内复发≥2次,32.9%的患者曾接受过风湿病咨询。结论基于电子病历的痛风自动登记册可行、有效,可用于评估和改善痛风管理。有趣的是,登记册发现,自 COVID-19 大流行以来,痛风的诊断或报告明显不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mosaic loss of chromosome Y characterizes late-onset rheumatoid arthritis and contrasting associations of polygenic risk score based on age at onset. Use of Metagenomic Microbial Plasma Cell-Free DNA Next-Generation Sequencing Assay in Outpatient Rheumatology Practice Proteomic profiling of the large vessel vasculitis spectrum identifies shared signatures of innate immune activation and stromal remodelling Pre-trained convolutional neural network with transfer learning by artificial illustrated images classify power Doppler ultrasound images of rheumatoid arthritis joints Associations between exposure to OPEs and rheumatoid arthritis risk among adults in NHANES, 2011-2018
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1