BCD020 rituximab bioanalog compared to standard treatment in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus: The data of 12 months case-control study

E. Kalashnikova, E. Isupova, E. Gaidar, Lyubov S. Sorokina, Maria Kaneva, V. Masalova, M. Dubko, Tatiana Kornishina, Natalia A. Lubimova, E. Kuchinskaya, I. Chikova, R. Raupov, O. Kalashnikova, M. Kostik
{"title":"BCD020 rituximab bioanalog compared to standard treatment in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus: The data of 12 months case-control study","authors":"E. Kalashnikova, E. Isupova, E. Gaidar, Lyubov S. Sorokina, Maria Kaneva, V. Masalova, M. Dubko, Tatiana Kornishina, Natalia A. Lubimova, E. Kuchinskaya, I. Chikova, R. Raupov, O. Kalashnikova, M. Kostik","doi":"10.5409/wjcp.v13.i1.89049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\n Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is the most frequent and serious systemic connective tissue disease. Nowadays there is no clear guidance on its treatment in childhood. There are a lot of negative effects of standard-of-care treatment (SOCT), including steroid toxicity. Rituximab (RTX) is the biological B-lymphocyte-depleting agent suggested as a basic therapy in pediatric SLE.\n AIM\n To compare the benefits of RTX above SOCT.\n METHODS\n The data from case histories of 79 children from the Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University from 2012 to 2022 years, were analyzed. The diagnosis of SLE was established with SLICC criteria. We compared the outcomes of treatment of SLE in children treated with and without RTX. Laboratory data, doses of glucocorticosteroids, disease activity measured with SELENA-SLEDAI, and organ damage were assessed at the time of initiation of therapy and one year later.\n RESULTS\n Patients, treated with RTX initially had a higher degree of disease activity with prevalence of central nervous system and kidney involvement, compared to patients with SOCT. One year later the disease characteristics became similar between groups with a more marked reduction of disease activity (SELENA-SLEDAI activity index) in the children who received RTX [-19 points (17; 23) since baseline] compared to children with SOCT [-10 (5; 15.5) points since baseline, P = 0.001], the number of patients with active lupus nephritis, and daily proteinuria. During RTX therapy, infectious diseases had three patients; one patient developed a bi-cytopenia.\n CONCLUSION\n RTX can be considered as the option in the treatment of severe forms of SLE, due to its ability to arrest disease activity compared to SOCT.","PeriodicalId":75338,"journal":{"name":"World journal of clinical pediatrics","volume":"55 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of clinical pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.v13.i1.89049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is the most frequent and serious systemic connective tissue disease. Nowadays there is no clear guidance on its treatment in childhood. There are a lot of negative effects of standard-of-care treatment (SOCT), including steroid toxicity. Rituximab (RTX) is the biological B-lymphocyte-depleting agent suggested as a basic therapy in pediatric SLE. AIM To compare the benefits of RTX above SOCT. METHODS The data from case histories of 79 children from the Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University from 2012 to 2022 years, were analyzed. The diagnosis of SLE was established with SLICC criteria. We compared the outcomes of treatment of SLE in children treated with and without RTX. Laboratory data, doses of glucocorticosteroids, disease activity measured with SELENA-SLEDAI, and organ damage were assessed at the time of initiation of therapy and one year later. RESULTS Patients, treated with RTX initially had a higher degree of disease activity with prevalence of central nervous system and kidney involvement, compared to patients with SOCT. One year later the disease characteristics became similar between groups with a more marked reduction of disease activity (SELENA-SLEDAI activity index) in the children who received RTX [-19 points (17; 23) since baseline] compared to children with SOCT [-10 (5; 15.5) points since baseline, P = 0.001], the number of patients with active lupus nephritis, and daily proteinuria. During RTX therapy, infectious diseases had three patients; one patient developed a bi-cytopenia. CONCLUSION RTX can be considered as the option in the treatment of severe forms of SLE, due to its ability to arrest disease activity compared to SOCT.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BCD020利妥昔单抗生物类似物与幼年系统性红斑狼疮标准疗法的比较:12个月病例对照研究数据
背景系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)是最常见、最严重的系统性结缔组织疾病。目前,对于儿童期的治疗还没有明确的指导意见。标准治疗(SOCT)有很多负面影响,包括类固醇毒性。利妥昔单抗(RTX)是一种生物B淋巴细胞清除剂,被建议作为儿童系统性红斑狼疮的基本疗法。目的 比较RTX比SOCT的优势。方法 对圣彼得堡国立儿科医科大学 2012 年至 2022 年期间 79 名儿童的病历数据进行分析。系统性红斑狼疮的诊断以 SLICC 标准为依据。我们比较了使用和不使用 RTX 治疗儿童系统性红斑狼疮的结果。我们对开始治疗时和一年后的实验室数据、糖皮质激素剂量、用 SELENA-SLEDAI 测量的疾病活动度和器官损伤进行了评估。结果 与接受SOCT治疗的患者相比,接受RTX治疗的患者最初的疾病活动度更高,中枢神经系统和肾脏受累更为普遍。一年后,两组患者的疾病特征变得相似,接受RTX治疗的患儿的疾病活动性(SELENA-SLEDAI活动指数)比接受SOCT治疗的患儿更明显降低[自基线以来降低了19点(17;23)][自基线以来降低了10点(5;15.5),P = 0.001],活动性狼疮肾炎患者的数量和每日蛋白尿也明显减少。在 RTX 治疗期间,有三名患者出现了感染性疾病;一名患者出现了全血细胞减少。结论 与SOCT相比,RTX能抑制疾病活动,因此可作为治疗重症系统性红斑狼疮的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Built environment and childhood obesity. Clinical and laboratory features of juvenile idiopathic arthritis with wrist involvement: Results of a retrospective cohort study. Decoding the genetic landscape of autism: A comprehensive review. Evaluation of thyroid profile among children aged 1-15 years with nephrotic syndrome: An observation study. Genetic predisposition to childhood cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1