Machine Learning Models and Technologies for Evidence-Based Telehealth and Smart Care: A Review

Stella C. Christopoulou
{"title":"Machine Learning Models and Technologies for Evidence-Based Telehealth and Smart Care: A Review","authors":"Stella C. Christopoulou","doi":"10.3390/biomedinformatics4010042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Over the past few years, clinical studies have utilized machine learning in telehealth and smart care for disease management, self-management, and managing health issues like pulmonary diseases, heart failure, diabetes screening, and intraoperative risks. However, a systematic review of machine learning’s use in evidence-based telehealth and smart care is lacking, as evidence-based practice aims to eliminate biases and subjective opinions. Methods: The author conducted a mixed methods review to explore machine learning applications in evidence-based telehealth and smart care. A systematic search of the literature was performed during 16 June 2023–27 June 2023 in Google Scholar, PubMed, and the clinical registry platform ClinicalTrials.gov. The author included articles in the review if they were implemented by evidence-based health informatics and concerned with telehealth and smart care technologies. Results: The author identifies 18 key studies (17 clinical trials) from 175 citations found in internet databases and categorizes them using problem-specific groupings, medical/health domains, machine learning models, algorithms, and techniques. Conclusions: Machine learning combined with the application of evidence-based practices in healthcare can enhance telehealth and smart care strategies by improving quality of personalized care, early detection of health-related problems, patient quality of life, patient-physician communication, resource efficiency and cost-effectiveness. However, this requires interdisciplinary expertise and collaboration among stakeholders, including clinicians, informaticians, and policymakers. Therefore, further research using clinicall studies, systematic reviews, analyses, and meta-analyses is required to fully exploit the potential of machine learning in this area.","PeriodicalId":72394,"journal":{"name":"BioMedInformatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioMedInformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedinformatics4010042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Over the past few years, clinical studies have utilized machine learning in telehealth and smart care for disease management, self-management, and managing health issues like pulmonary diseases, heart failure, diabetes screening, and intraoperative risks. However, a systematic review of machine learning’s use in evidence-based telehealth and smart care is lacking, as evidence-based practice aims to eliminate biases and subjective opinions. Methods: The author conducted a mixed methods review to explore machine learning applications in evidence-based telehealth and smart care. A systematic search of the literature was performed during 16 June 2023–27 June 2023 in Google Scholar, PubMed, and the clinical registry platform ClinicalTrials.gov. The author included articles in the review if they were implemented by evidence-based health informatics and concerned with telehealth and smart care technologies. Results: The author identifies 18 key studies (17 clinical trials) from 175 citations found in internet databases and categorizes them using problem-specific groupings, medical/health domains, machine learning models, algorithms, and techniques. Conclusions: Machine learning combined with the application of evidence-based practices in healthcare can enhance telehealth and smart care strategies by improving quality of personalized care, early detection of health-related problems, patient quality of life, patient-physician communication, resource efficiency and cost-effectiveness. However, this requires interdisciplinary expertise and collaboration among stakeholders, including clinicians, informaticians, and policymakers. Therefore, further research using clinicall studies, systematic reviews, analyses, and meta-analyses is required to fully exploit the potential of machine learning in this area.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于证据的远程医疗和智能护理的机器学习模型和技术:综述
背景:在过去几年中,临床研究已将机器学习应用于远程医疗和智能护理中的疾病管理、自我管理以及肺部疾病、心力衰竭、糖尿病筛查和术中风险等健康问题的管理。然而,由于循证实践旨在消除偏见和主观意见,因此缺乏对机器学习在循证远程医疗和智能护理中应用的系统性回顾。方法:作者采用混合方法综述了机器学习在循证远程医疗和智能护理中的应用。作者于 2023 年 6 月 16 日至 2023 年 6 月 27 日期间在谷歌学术、PubMed 和临床注册平台 ClinicalTrials.gov 上对文献进行了系统检索。作者将循证健康信息学实施的、与远程医疗和智能护理技术相关的文章纳入了综述。结果:作者从互联网数据库中找到的 175 篇引文中确定了 18 项关键研究(17 项临床试验),并使用特定问题分组、医疗/健康领域、机器学习模型、算法和技术对其进行了分类。结论:机器学习与循证实践在医疗保健领域的应用相结合,可以提高个性化护理的质量、健康相关问题的早期发现、患者的生活质量、医患沟通、资源效率和成本效益,从而加强远程医疗和智能护理战略。然而,这需要跨学科的专业知识以及包括临床医生、信息学家和政策制定者在内的利益相关者之间的合作。因此,需要利用临床研究、系统回顾、分析和荟萃分析开展进一步研究,以充分挖掘机器学习在这一领域的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cinco de Bio: A Low-Code Platform for Domain-Specific Workflows for Biomedical Imaging Research Approaches to Extracting Patterns of Service Utilization for Patients with Complex Conditions: Graph Community Detection vs. Natural Language Processing Clustering Replies to Queries in Gynecologic Oncology by Bard, Bing and the Google Assistant Should AI-Powered Whole-Genome Sequencing Be Used Routinely for Personalized Decision Support in Surgical Oncology—A Scoping Review Transfer-Learning Approach for Enhanced Brain Tumor Classification in MRI Imaging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1