Seguridad y eficacia del nivolumab para el tratamiento de pacientes con carcinoma de células renales metastásico e insuficiencia renal

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Actas urologicas espanolas Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.acuro.2024.01.014
N. Sengul , I. Gültürk , M. Yilmaz , E. Celik , N. Paksoy , E. Yekedüz , Y. Ürün , M. Basaran , M. Özgüroğlu
{"title":"Seguridad y eficacia del nivolumab para el tratamiento de pacientes con carcinoma de células renales metastásico e insuficiencia renal","authors":"N. Sengul ,&nbsp;I. Gültürk ,&nbsp;M. Yilmaz ,&nbsp;E. Celik ,&nbsp;N. Paksoy ,&nbsp;E. Yekedüz ,&nbsp;Y. Ürün ,&nbsp;M. Basaran ,&nbsp;M. Özgüroğlu","doi":"10.1016/j.acuro.2024.01.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Patients with renal insufficiency, usually defined as those with creatinine clearance<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->40<!--> <!-->mL/min, were excluded from pivotal clinical trials, especially in studies involving nivolumab therapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC).The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) stratified according to creatinine clearance.</p></div><div><h3>Material and metods</h3><p>Data from mRCC patients treated with nivolumab were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified into two categories according to their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR); the first category (C1) included patients with eGFR<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->40<!--> <!-->mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> and the second category(<span>C</span>2). included those with eGFR≥ 40<!--> <!-->mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2.</sup></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 95 patients enrolled, 1. group included 26 patients (27.4%) and 2. group included 69 patients (72.6%). None of the pts in category 1 were on hemodialysis. Overall incidence of adverse events was not statistically different between the two groups (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.469). The overall response rate ORR was 50% in the first group and 42.0% in the second group (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.486). Median overall survival (OS) was longer with 23.3 months in the 2. group versus 11 months in the 1. group (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.415).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Renal insufficiency is a common problem in patients with advanced renal cancer since they often undergo nephrectomy and their renal function may also worsen while receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. We found that there is no significant difference in the safety and efficacy of nivolumab treatment between two groups. Nivolumab appears to be a safe and effective agent in patients with renal impairment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7145,"journal":{"name":"Actas urologicas espanolas","volume":"48 4","pages":"Pages 273-280"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actas urologicas espanolas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210480624000202","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Patients with renal insufficiency, usually defined as those with creatinine clearance < 40 mL/min, were excluded from pivotal clinical trials, especially in studies involving nivolumab therapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC).The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) stratified according to creatinine clearance.

Material and metods

Data from mRCC patients treated with nivolumab were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified into two categories according to their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR); the first category (C1) included patients with eGFR < 40 mL/min/1.73 m2 and the second category(C2). included those with eGFR≥ 40 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Results

Of the 95 patients enrolled, 1. group included 26 patients (27.4%) and 2. group included 69 patients (72.6%). None of the pts in category 1 were on hemodialysis. Overall incidence of adverse events was not statistically different between the two groups (p = 0.469). The overall response rate ORR was 50% in the first group and 42.0% in the second group (p = 0.486). Median overall survival (OS) was longer with 23.3 months in the 2. group versus 11 months in the 1. group (p = 0.415).

Conclusion

Renal insufficiency is a common problem in patients with advanced renal cancer since they often undergo nephrectomy and their renal function may also worsen while receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. We found that there is no significant difference in the safety and efficacy of nivolumab treatment between two groups. Nivolumab appears to be a safe and effective agent in patients with renal impairment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼妥珠单抗治疗转移性肾细胞癌和肾功能衰竭患者的安全性和有效性
引言肾功能不全患者通常被定义为肌酐清除率大于或等于40 mL/min的患者,他们被排除在关键临床试验之外,尤其是在涉及尼妥珠单抗治疗肾细胞癌(RCC)患者的研究中。根据患者的估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)将其分为两类,第一类(C1)包括eGFR为40 mL/min/1.73 m2的患者,第二类(C2)包括eGFR≥40 mL/min/1.73 m2的患者。结果 在入组的95名患者中,1.组包括26名患者(27.4%),2.组包括69名患者(72.6%)。第 1 组患者均未进行血液透析。两组的不良反应发生率无统计学差异(P = 0.469)。第一组的总反应率ORR为50%,第二组为42.0%(P = 0.486)。结论肾功能不全是晚期肾癌患者的常见问题,因为他们通常要接受肾切除术,而且在接受酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗期间,肾功能也可能会恶化。我们发现,两组患者接受尼妥珠单抗治疗的安全性和有效性没有明显差异。对于肾功能受损的患者来说,尼妥珠单抗似乎是一种安全有效的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Actas urologicas espanolas
Actas urologicas espanolas UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Actas Urológicas Españolas is an international journal dedicated to urological diseases and renal transplant. It has been the official publication of the Spanish Urology Association since 1974 and of the American Urology Confederation since 2008. Its articles cover all aspects related to urology. Actas Urológicas Españolas, governed by the peer review system (double blinded), is published online in Spanish and English. Consequently, manuscripts may be sent in Spanish or English and bidirectional free cost translation will be provided.
期刊最新文献
El leaking pipeline y las brechas de género en Urología Controversias en el abordaje del cáncer de próstata: consenso de recomendaciones de expertos del norte de España Hacia el cribado poblacional del cáncer de próstata en España Evaluación de los cambios en la función sexual en pacientes sometidos a cirugía endoscópica de la litiasis del tracto urinario superior Producción científica en urología: un análisis bibliométrico de 20 años en Latinoamérica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1