Tools that Eliminate Gender Differences in the Academic Self-Concept

Natalia González-Benítez, Javier Palomino, Maria del Carmen Molina
{"title":"Tools that Eliminate Gender Differences in the Academic Self-Concept","authors":"Natalia González-Benítez, Javier Palomino, Maria del Carmen Molina","doi":"10.1525/abt.2024.86.3.143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite critical thinking supporting a deeper understanding of the scientific process, university activities prioritize lower cognitive processes, such as remembering skills. Also, it is unclear whether gender biases in interest toward science exist in university science degrees. These hinder students from achieving their goals effectively since students’ test scores and motivation improve with project-based learning. The main goal of this study is to examine the influence of active methodology based on research project-based learning (RPBL) on students’ overall perception and its variation across gender groups in relation to the acquisition of higher-order cognitive skills. The RPBL activity will consist of a straightforward microbial ecology project in which the students will use conventional and affordable lab equipment. The project will address all higher-order thinking skills levels included in Bloom’s taxonomy. We evaluated students’ perception of their learning outcomes on lab and cognitive skills, including the effect of gender, using two online surveys we passed before and after the RPBL activity. The results displayed that the students’ opinion regarding the project was decidedly favorable. Most of the students view the potential effort required for these activities positively, as it pertains to the subject matter and enhances their learning. However, the gender differences that were observed prior to the project’s implementation disappeared once the activity was carried out. Female students lacked confidence in their statistical skills while they had high confidence in their laboratory skills compared to male students. After attending our RPBL activity, female students gained confidence in statistics, and male students gained confidence in laboratory skills. This project reveals that a straightforward and affordable RPBL activity, which would not suppose a substantial additional workload for university lecturers, holds the potential to serve as a valuable tool to eliminate gender segregation, enhancing students’ academic self-concept, and improving their prospects for success. Additionally, it emphasizes higher cognitive skills, particularly the critical thinking skills that are essential within the university environment.","PeriodicalId":513114,"journal":{"name":"The American Biology Teacher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Biology Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2024.86.3.143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite critical thinking supporting a deeper understanding of the scientific process, university activities prioritize lower cognitive processes, such as remembering skills. Also, it is unclear whether gender biases in interest toward science exist in university science degrees. These hinder students from achieving their goals effectively since students’ test scores and motivation improve with project-based learning. The main goal of this study is to examine the influence of active methodology based on research project-based learning (RPBL) on students’ overall perception and its variation across gender groups in relation to the acquisition of higher-order cognitive skills. The RPBL activity will consist of a straightforward microbial ecology project in which the students will use conventional and affordable lab equipment. The project will address all higher-order thinking skills levels included in Bloom’s taxonomy. We evaluated students’ perception of their learning outcomes on lab and cognitive skills, including the effect of gender, using two online surveys we passed before and after the RPBL activity. The results displayed that the students’ opinion regarding the project was decidedly favorable. Most of the students view the potential effort required for these activities positively, as it pertains to the subject matter and enhances their learning. However, the gender differences that were observed prior to the project’s implementation disappeared once the activity was carried out. Female students lacked confidence in their statistical skills while they had high confidence in their laboratory skills compared to male students. After attending our RPBL activity, female students gained confidence in statistics, and male students gained confidence in laboratory skills. This project reveals that a straightforward and affordable RPBL activity, which would not suppose a substantial additional workload for university lecturers, holds the potential to serve as a valuable tool to eliminate gender segregation, enhancing students’ academic self-concept, and improving their prospects for success. Additionally, it emphasizes higher cognitive skills, particularly the critical thinking skills that are essential within the university environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消除学术自我概念中性别差异的工具
尽管批判性思维有助于加深对科学过程的理解,但大学活动优先考虑的是记忆技能等较低的认知过程。此外,目前还不清楚大学科学学位是否存在对科学兴趣的性别偏见。这些都会阻碍学生有效地实现自己的目标,因为基于项目的学习会提高学生的考试成绩和学习积极性。本研究的主要目标是考察基于研究项目式学习(RPBL)的积极方法对学生整体认知的影响,以及不同性别群体在掌握高阶认知技能方面的差异。RPBL 活动将包括一个简单的微生物生态学项目,学生们将在其中使用传统的、经济实惠的实验设备。该项目将涉及布卢姆分类学中的所有高阶思维能力水平。我们在 RPBL 活动前后进行了两次在线调查,评估了学生对实验和认知技能学习成果的看法,包括性别的影响。结果显示,学生们对该项目持肯定态度。大多数学生对这些活动可能需要付出的努力持积极态度,因为这与主题相关,并能促进他们的学习。然而,在项目实施前观察到的性别差异在活动开展后消失了。女生对自己的统计技能缺乏信心,而与男生相比,她们对自己的实验技能信心十足。参加了我们的 RPBL 活动后,女生对统计学增强了信心,而男生则对实验技能增强了信心。本项目揭示了一种简单易行、经济实惠的 RPBL 活动,它不会给大学讲师带来大量额外的工作量,却有可能成为消除性别隔离的重要工具,增强学生的学术自我概念,改善他们的成功前景。此外,它还强调高等认知技能,特别是在大学环境中必不可少的批判性思维能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Visualizing Genomic Medicine An Investigation of the Impact of Online and In-Person Delivery of Undergraduate Biology Instruction Tactile Trees An Apple a Day Keeps the Gray Mold Away Utilizing the Power of Cooperative Learning to Teach Controversial Topics such as Genetically Modified Organisms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1