Coal price shock propagation through sectoral financial interconnectedness in China's stock market: Quantile coherency network modelling and shock decomposition analysis

IF 3.7 4区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Commodity Markets Pub Date : 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jcomm.2024.100392
Yan Zhang , Yushi Xu , Xintong Zhu , Jionghao Huang
{"title":"Coal price shock propagation through sectoral financial interconnectedness in China's stock market: Quantile coherency network modelling and shock decomposition analysis","authors":"Yan Zhang ,&nbsp;Yushi Xu ,&nbsp;Xintong Zhu ,&nbsp;Jionghao Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomm.2024.100392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The long and continuing coal-dominated energy structure in China makes it important to investigate the impact of coal price shocks on China's financial markets. This study identifies whether volatilities in coal market may propagate between sectoral equity markets through the heterogeneous connectedness between these markets, and even further contribute to larger scale overall instabilities. We first apply the cross-spectral quantile coherency (QC) to identify the time-frequency interconnectedness among returns of 28 sectors in China's equity market. A spatial autoregressive (SAR) framework based on the QC network is further utilized to identify the indirect effect propagating through the heterogeneous interconnectedness between 28 sectoral equity markets. The empirical results indicate significant risk contagion effects during market turmoil, while strong risk absorbing effects are confirmed for the tranquil case. The significantly varying sectoral interconnectedness along with the corresponding heterogeneous pattern of shock propagation under various market specifications may provide evidence for the spillover effects to be the key mechanism and the sectoral interconnectedness as an important channel for coal price shock propagation, which is essential to the effectiveness of portfolio diversification and financial stabilizing policy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Commodity Markets","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Commodity Markets","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405851324000114","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The long and continuing coal-dominated energy structure in China makes it important to investigate the impact of coal price shocks on China's financial markets. This study identifies whether volatilities in coal market may propagate between sectoral equity markets through the heterogeneous connectedness between these markets, and even further contribute to larger scale overall instabilities. We first apply the cross-spectral quantile coherency (QC) to identify the time-frequency interconnectedness among returns of 28 sectors in China's equity market. A spatial autoregressive (SAR) framework based on the QC network is further utilized to identify the indirect effect propagating through the heterogeneous interconnectedness between 28 sectoral equity markets. The empirical results indicate significant risk contagion effects during market turmoil, while strong risk absorbing effects are confirmed for the tranquil case. The significantly varying sectoral interconnectedness along with the corresponding heterogeneous pattern of shock propagation under various market specifications may provide evidence for the spillover effects to be the key mechanism and the sectoral interconnectedness as an important channel for coal price shock propagation, which is essential to the effectiveness of portfolio diversification and financial stabilizing policy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
煤炭价格冲击通过中国股市的行业金融关联性传播:量子一致性网络建模与冲击分解分析
中国长期以来以煤炭为主的能源结构使得研究煤炭价格冲击对中国金融市场的影响显得尤为重要。本研究探讨了煤炭市场的波动是否会通过部门股票市场之间的异质性联系在这些市场之间传播,甚至进一步导致更大规模的整体不稳定性。我们首先运用跨谱量化一致性(QC)来识别中国股票市场 28 个行业收益率之间的时频关联性。我们进一步利用基于 QC 网络的空间自回归(SAR)框架来识别通过 28 个行业股票市场之间的异质性关联传播的间接效应。实证结果表明,在市场动荡时,风险传染效应显著,而在市场平静时,风险吸收效应则很强。在不同的市场规格下,行业相互关联度的明显差异以及相应的异质性冲击传播模式,可以证明溢出效应是煤炭价格冲击传播的关键机制,而行业相互关联度则是煤炭价格冲击传播的重要渠道,这对投资组合多样化和金融稳定政策的有效性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal is also to stimulate international dialog among academics, industry participants, traders, investors, and policymakers with mutual interests in commodity markets. The mandate for the journal is to present ongoing work within commodity economics and finance. Topics can be related to financialization of commodity markets; pricing, hedging, and risk analysis of commodity derivatives; risk premia in commodity markets; real option analysis for commodity project investment and production; portfolio allocation including commodities; forecasting in commodity markets; corporate finance for commodity-exposed corporations; econometric/statistical analysis of commodity markets; organization of commodity markets; regulation of commodity markets; local and global commodity trading; and commodity supply chains. Commodity markets in this context are energy markets (including renewables), metal markets, mineral markets, agricultural markets, livestock and fish markets, markets for weather derivatives, emission markets, shipping markets, water, and related markets. This interdisciplinary and trans-disciplinary journal will cover all commodity markets and is thus relevant for a broad audience. Commodity markets are not only of academic interest but also highly relevant for many practitioners, including asset managers, industrial managers, investment bankers, risk managers, and also policymakers in governments, central banks, and supranational institutions.
期刊最新文献
Importance of geopolitical risk in volatility structure: New evidence from biofuels, crude oil, and grains commodity markets Expected returns on commodity ETFs and their underlying assets The role of news sentiment in salmon price prediction using deep learning When Chinese mania meets global frenzy: Commodity price bubbles Do oil market shocks affect financial distress? Evidence from firm-level global data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1