Proteomics techniques in protein biomarker discovery

Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1002/qub2.35
Mahsa Babaei, S. Kashanian, Huang‐Teck Lee, Frances Harding
{"title":"Proteomics techniques in protein biomarker discovery","authors":"Mahsa Babaei, S. Kashanian, Huang‐Teck Lee, Frances Harding","doi":"10.1002/qub2.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Protein biomarkers represent specific biological activities and processes, so they have had a critical role in cancer diagnosis and medical care for more than 50 years. With the recent improvement in proteomics technologies, thousands of protein biomarker candidates have been developed for diverse disease states. Studies have used different types of samples for proteomics diagnosis. Samples were pretreated with appropriate techniques to increase the selectivity and sensitivity of the downstream analysis and purified to remove the contaminants. The purified samples were analyzed by several principal proteomics techniques to identify the specific protein. In this study, recent improvements in protein biomarker discovery, verification, and validation are investigated. Furthermore, the advantages, and disadvantages of conventional techniques, are discussed. Studies have used mass spectroscopy (MS) as a critical technique in the identification and quantification of candidate biomarkers. Nevertheless, after protein biomarker discovery, verification and validation have been required to reduce the false‐positive rate where there have been higher number of samples. Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM), parallel reaction monitoring (PRM), and selected reaction monitoring (SRM), in combination with stable isotope‐labeled internal standards, have been examined as options for biomarker verification, and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for validation.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"85 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/qub2.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Protein biomarkers represent specific biological activities and processes, so they have had a critical role in cancer diagnosis and medical care for more than 50 years. With the recent improvement in proteomics technologies, thousands of protein biomarker candidates have been developed for diverse disease states. Studies have used different types of samples for proteomics diagnosis. Samples were pretreated with appropriate techniques to increase the selectivity and sensitivity of the downstream analysis and purified to remove the contaminants. The purified samples were analyzed by several principal proteomics techniques to identify the specific protein. In this study, recent improvements in protein biomarker discovery, verification, and validation are investigated. Furthermore, the advantages, and disadvantages of conventional techniques, are discussed. Studies have used mass spectroscopy (MS) as a critical technique in the identification and quantification of candidate biomarkers. Nevertheless, after protein biomarker discovery, verification and validation have been required to reduce the false‐positive rate where there have been higher number of samples. Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM), parallel reaction monitoring (PRM), and selected reaction monitoring (SRM), in combination with stable isotope‐labeled internal standards, have been examined as options for biomarker verification, and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for validation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
发现蛋白质生物标记物的蛋白质组学技术
蛋白质生物标志物代表着特定的生物活动和过程,因此 50 多年来,它们在癌症诊断和医疗保健中发挥着至关重要的作用。近年来,随着蛋白质组学技术的不断进步,针对不同疾病状态开发出了数千种候选蛋白质生物标志物。研究使用了不同类型的样本进行蛋白质组学诊断。样本通过适当的技术进行预处理,以提高下游分析的选择性和灵敏度,并进行纯化以去除杂质。纯化后的样本通过几种主要的蛋白质组学技术进行分析,以确定特定的蛋白质。本研究探讨了蛋白质生物标记物发现、验证和确认方面的最新进展。此外,还讨论了传统技术的优缺点。研究已将质谱(MS)作为识别和量化候选生物标记物的关键技术。然而,在发现蛋白质生物标记物之后,还需要进行验证和确认,以降低样本数量较多时的假阳性率。多反应监测 (MRM)、平行反应监测 (PRM) 和选择反应监测 (SRM) 与稳定同位素标记的内标相结合,已被视为生物标记物验证的备选方法,而酶联免疫吸附测定 (ELISA) 则可用于验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1