Spillover effects, lead and lag relationships, and stable coins time series

IF 2.9 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance Pub Date : 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1016/j.qref.2024.03.003
Seongcheol Paeng , Dave Senteney , Taewon Yang
{"title":"Spillover effects, lead and lag relationships, and stable coins time series","authors":"Seongcheol Paeng ,&nbsp;Dave Senteney ,&nbsp;Taewon Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.qref.2024.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research explores plausible spillover effects among S&amp;P 500 Index, stable coins, and selected cryptocurrency time series by examining observable lead and lag interrelationships among the series. Considering the heteroscedastic and “fat-tailed” nature of the data distributions underlying the empirical analyses, we employ quantile Granger Causality tests to improve the validity of our statistical findings. Our test results suggest that stable coins, USDT, and USDC offer diversification benefits by decreasing portfolio risk. The log returns of the S&amp;P 500 Index, stable coins, Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Binance coins demonstrate clear bidirectional causality and spillover effects in low and high quantiles. Interestingly, however, stable coin and USDT returns strongly lead S&amp;P 500 Index returns in nearly all quantiles for post COVID-19 time periods. These findings indirectly support intuition based upon market co-movement or integration assertions and suggest that investors can obtain added diversification benefits deriving from causality or spillover effects of holding stable coins when forming investment portfolios.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47962,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062976924000280","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research explores plausible spillover effects among S&P 500 Index, stable coins, and selected cryptocurrency time series by examining observable lead and lag interrelationships among the series. Considering the heteroscedastic and “fat-tailed” nature of the data distributions underlying the empirical analyses, we employ quantile Granger Causality tests to improve the validity of our statistical findings. Our test results suggest that stable coins, USDT, and USDC offer diversification benefits by decreasing portfolio risk. The log returns of the S&P 500 Index, stable coins, Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Binance coins demonstrate clear bidirectional causality and spillover effects in low and high quantiles. Interestingly, however, stable coin and USDT returns strongly lead S&P 500 Index returns in nearly all quantiles for post COVID-19 time periods. These findings indirectly support intuition based upon market co-movement or integration assertions and suggest that investors can obtain added diversification benefits deriving from causality or spillover effects of holding stable coins when forming investment portfolios.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
溢出效应、领先和滞后关系以及稳定硬币时间序列
本研究通过考察 S&P 500 指数、稳定币和特定加密货币时间序列之间可观察到的前导和滞后相互关系,探讨了这些序列之间看似合理的溢出效应。考虑到实证分析所依据的数据分布的异方差和 "胖尾 "性质,我们采用了量子格兰杰因果检验来提高统计结果的有效性。我们的检验结果表明,稳定币、USDT 和 USDC 通过降低投资组合风险带来了多样化收益。S&P 500 指数、稳定币、比特币、以太坊和 Binance 币的对数收益率在低和高分位数中显示出明显的双向因果关系和溢出效应。然而,有趣的是,在 COVID-19 之后的时间段,稳定币和 USDT 的回报几乎在所有量化值中都强烈领先于 S&P 500 指数的回报。这些发现间接支持了基于市场共动或整合论断的直觉,并表明投资者在形成投资组合时,可以从持有稳定币的因果关系或溢出效应中获得额外的多样化收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance (QREF) attracts and publishes high quality manuscripts that cover topics in the areas of economics, financial economics and finance. The subject matter may be theoretical, empirical or policy related. Emphasis is placed on quality, originality, clear arguments, persuasive evidence, intelligent analysis and clear writing. At least one Special Issue is published per year. These issues have guest editors, are devoted to a single theme and the papers have well known authors. In addition we pride ourselves in being able to provide three to four article "Focus" sections in most of our issues.
期刊最新文献
Monetary policy through the risk-taking channel: Evidence from an emerging market Bank insolvency risk, Z-score measures and unimodal returns: A refinement Can corporate social performance mitigate the risk of extreme stock returns? Are public debt and public debt expectations associated with debt management strategies? Time-frequency co-movement and cross-quantile connectedness of exchange rates: Evidence from ASEAN+3 Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1