Are starch-based materials more eco-friendly than fossil-based? A critical assessment

IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Cleaner Environmental Systems Pub Date : 2024-03-02 DOI:10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100177
Naycari Forfora , Ivana Azuaje , Taylor Kanipe , Jose A. Gonzalez , Mariana Lendewig , Isabel Urdaneta , Richard Venditti , Ronalds Gonzalez , Dimitris Argyropoulos
{"title":"Are starch-based materials more eco-friendly than fossil-based? A critical assessment","authors":"Naycari Forfora ,&nbsp;Ivana Azuaje ,&nbsp;Taylor Kanipe ,&nbsp;Jose A. Gonzalez ,&nbsp;Mariana Lendewig ,&nbsp;Isabel Urdaneta ,&nbsp;Richard Venditti ,&nbsp;Ronalds Gonzalez ,&nbsp;Dimitris Argyropoulos","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This review conducts a comprehensive quantitative analysis of the life cycle assessments (LCA) of starch-based products from production inception (biomass and starch production) to final manufacture. More specifically, this analysis synthesizes published LCA data for starch-based films, foams, polylactic acid (PLA), and filaments against typical fossil-based counterparts (polyethylene and polystyrene), revealing PLA’s carbon emissions range from 0.62 to 5.3 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq/kg, films at 3.2–5.8 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq/kg, and foams at 1.3–3.2 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq/kg, contrasted with fossil-based products emitting 0.7–6.7 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq/kg. Despite lower carbon dioxide emissions for starch-based products, the broader environmental impact, including eutrophication and acidification, often exceeds that of fossil-based counterparts, attributed to agricultural inputs such as fertilizers and pesticides.</p><p>This review delineates the environmental merits of starch-based products, outlines their optimal applications, and underscores the imperative for future research to address identified knowledge gaps and methodological limitations, particularly in the comprehensive environmental assessment of agricultural inputs and their mitigation strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100177"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000151/pdfft?md5=4d020636bcfd99bebc147ac2aa2e0db7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000151-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This review conducts a comprehensive quantitative analysis of the life cycle assessments (LCA) of starch-based products from production inception (biomass and starch production) to final manufacture. More specifically, this analysis synthesizes published LCA data for starch-based films, foams, polylactic acid (PLA), and filaments against typical fossil-based counterparts (polyethylene and polystyrene), revealing PLA’s carbon emissions range from 0.62 to 5.3 kg CO2eq/kg, films at 3.2–5.8 kg CO2eq/kg, and foams at 1.3–3.2 kg CO2eq/kg, contrasted with fossil-based products emitting 0.7–6.7 kg CO2eq/kg. Despite lower carbon dioxide emissions for starch-based products, the broader environmental impact, including eutrophication and acidification, often exceeds that of fossil-based counterparts, attributed to agricultural inputs such as fertilizers and pesticides.

This review delineates the environmental merits of starch-based products, outlines their optimal applications, and underscores the imperative for future research to address identified knowledge gaps and methodological limitations, particularly in the comprehensive environmental assessment of agricultural inputs and their mitigation strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
淀粉基材料是否比化石基材料更环保?批判性评估
本综述对淀粉基产品从开始生产(生物质和淀粉生产)到最终制造的生命周期评估(LCA)进行了全面的定量分析。更具体地说,该分析综合了已公布的淀粉基薄膜、泡沫、聚乳酸和长丝的生命周期评估数据,并与典型的化石基产品(聚乙烯和聚苯乙烯)进行对比,结果显示聚乳酸的碳排放量为 0.62 至 5.3 千克二氧化碳当量/千克,薄膜为 3.2 至 5.8 千克二氧化碳当量/千克,泡沫为 1.3 至 3.2 千克二氧化碳当量/千克,而化石基产品的二氧化碳排放量为 0.7 至 6.7 千克二氧化碳当量/千克。尽管淀粉基产品的二氧化碳排放量较低,但由于化肥和杀虫剂等农业投入,其对环境的影响(包括富营养化和酸化)往往超过化石基产品。本综述描述了淀粉基产品的环境优势,概述了其最佳应用,并强调了未来研究的必要性,以解决已确定的知识差距和方法限制,特别是在农业投入及其减缓战略的综合环境评估方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Cleaner Environmental Systems Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
Life cycle sustainability assessment of microbial oil from organic waste Techno-economic feasibility study of ammonia recovery from sewage sludge digestate in wastewater treatment plants Life focycle assessment of Brazilian bleached eucalyptus kraft pulp: Integrating bleaching processes and biogenic carbon impacts A novel integrated material flow cost accounting (MFCA)- IoT-lean management system approach to improving water use efficiency and reducing costs in the beverage industry Eco-efficiency of coffee production and consumption in the UK at the product and sectoral levels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1