Prosthetic Visual Acuity with the PRIMA Subretinal Microchip in Patients with Atrophic Age-Related Macular Degeneration at 4 Years Follow-up

IF 3.2 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmology science Pub Date : 2024-03-07 DOI:10.1016/j.xops.2024.100510
Mahiul Muhammed Khan Muqit MD, FRCOphth , Yannick Le Mer MD , Lisa Olmos de Koo MD , Frank G. Holz MD , Jose A. Sahel MD , Daniel Palanker PhD
{"title":"Prosthetic Visual Acuity with the PRIMA Subretinal Microchip in Patients with Atrophic Age-Related Macular Degeneration at 4 Years Follow-up","authors":"Mahiul Muhammed Khan Muqit MD, FRCOphth ,&nbsp;Yannick Le Mer MD ,&nbsp;Lisa Olmos de Koo MD ,&nbsp;Frank G. Holz MD ,&nbsp;Jose A. Sahel MD ,&nbsp;Daniel Palanker PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xops.2024.100510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the efficacy and safety of the PRIMA neurostimulation system with a subretinal microchip for improving visual acuity (VA) in patients with geographic atrophy (GA) due to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) at 48-months postimplantation.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Feasibility clinical trial of the PRIMA subretinal prosthesis in patients with atrophic AMD, measuring best-corrected ETDRS VA (<span>Clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg> <span>NCT03333954</span><svg><path></path></svg>).</p></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><p>Five patients with GA, no foveal light perception, and VA of logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) 1.3 to 1.7 (20/400-20/1000) in their worse-seeing “study” eye.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In patients subretinally implanted with a photovoltaic neurostimulation array containing 378 pixels of 100 μm in size, the VA was measured with and without the PRIMA system using ETDRS charts at 1 m. The system’s external components, augmented reality glasses, and pocket computer provide image processing capabilities, including zoom.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Visual acuity using ETDRS charts with and without the system, as well as light sensitivity in the central visual field, measured by Octopus perimetry. Anatomical outcomes demonstrated by fundus photography and OCT up to 48 months postimplantation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All 5 subjects met the primary end point of light perception elicited by the implant in the scotoma area. In 1 patient, the implant was incorrectly inserted into the choroid. One subject died 18 months postimplantation due to study-unrelated reasons. ETDRS VA results for the remaining 3 subjects are reported here. Without zoom, VA closely matched the pixel size of the implant: 1.17 ± 0.13 pixels, corresponding to a mean logMAR of 1.39, or Snellen of 20/500, ranging from 20/438 to 20/565. Using zoom at 48 months, subjects improved their VA by 32 ETDRS letters versus baseline (standard error 5.1) 95% confidence intervals (13.4, 49.9; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). Natural peripheral visual function in the treated eye did not decline after surgery or during the 48-month follow-up period (<em>P</em> = 0.08).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Subretinal implantation of PRIMA in subjects with GA experiencing profound vision loss due to AMD is feasible and well tolerated, with no reduction of natural peripheral vision up to 48 months. Prosthetic central vision provided by photovoltaic neurostimulation enabled patients to reliably recognize letters and sequences of letters, and with zoom, it improved VA of up to 8 ETDRS lines.</p></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><p>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74363,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914524000460/pdfft?md5=1ab9d0dd84f5ae65da17ee9fd952f926&pid=1-s2.0-S2666914524000460-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914524000460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of the PRIMA neurostimulation system with a subretinal microchip for improving visual acuity (VA) in patients with geographic atrophy (GA) due to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) at 48-months postimplantation.

Design

Feasibility clinical trial of the PRIMA subretinal prosthesis in patients with atrophic AMD, measuring best-corrected ETDRS VA (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03333954).

Subjects

Five patients with GA, no foveal light perception, and VA of logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) 1.3 to 1.7 (20/400-20/1000) in their worse-seeing “study” eye.

Methods

In patients subretinally implanted with a photovoltaic neurostimulation array containing 378 pixels of 100 μm in size, the VA was measured with and without the PRIMA system using ETDRS charts at 1 m. The system’s external components, augmented reality glasses, and pocket computer provide image processing capabilities, including zoom.

Main Outcome Measures

Visual acuity using ETDRS charts with and without the system, as well as light sensitivity in the central visual field, measured by Octopus perimetry. Anatomical outcomes demonstrated by fundus photography and OCT up to 48 months postimplantation.

Results

All 5 subjects met the primary end point of light perception elicited by the implant in the scotoma area. In 1 patient, the implant was incorrectly inserted into the choroid. One subject died 18 months postimplantation due to study-unrelated reasons. ETDRS VA results for the remaining 3 subjects are reported here. Without zoom, VA closely matched the pixel size of the implant: 1.17 ± 0.13 pixels, corresponding to a mean logMAR of 1.39, or Snellen of 20/500, ranging from 20/438 to 20/565. Using zoom at 48 months, subjects improved their VA by 32 ETDRS letters versus baseline (standard error 5.1) 95% confidence intervals (13.4, 49.9; P < 0.0001). Natural peripheral visual function in the treated eye did not decline after surgery or during the 48-month follow-up period (P = 0.08).

Conclusions

Subretinal implantation of PRIMA in subjects with GA experiencing profound vision loss due to AMD is feasible and well tolerated, with no reduction of natural peripheral vision up to 48 months. Prosthetic central vision provided by photovoltaic neurostimulation enabled patients to reliably recognize letters and sequences of letters, and with zoom, it improved VA of up to 8 ETDRS lines.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在萎缩性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者中使用 PRIMA 视网膜下微芯片修复视力,随访 4 年
目的评估带有视网膜下微芯片的 PRIMA 神经刺激系统在植入后 48 个月改善老年性黄斑变性(AMD)所致地理萎缩(GA)患者视力(VA)的有效性和安全性。设计对萎缩性 AMD 患者进行 PRIMA 视网膜下假体的可行性临床试验,测量最佳校正 ETDRS VA(Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03333954)。方法在患者视网膜下植入一个光电神经刺激阵列,该阵列包含 378 个大小为 100 μm 的像素,在使用和不使用 PRIMA 系统的情况下,使用 ETDRS 图表在 1 米处测量 VA。该系统的外部组件、增强现实眼镜和袖珍电脑提供了图像处理功能,包括缩放功能。主要结果测量使用和未使用该系统时使用 ETDRS 图表测量的视力,以及章鱼视力测定法测量的中心视野光敏感度。结果所有 5 名受试者都达到了主要终点,即植入物在视网膜散光区引起的光感。一名患者的植入体被错误地植入脉络膜。一名受试者在植入后18个月因与研究无关的原因死亡。本文报告了其余 3 位受试者的 ETDRS VA 结果。在不变焦的情况下,视力与植入体的像素大小非常接近:1.17 ± 0.13 像素,相当于平均 logMAR 1.39,或斯奈伦视力 20/500,范围从 20/438 到 20/565。在 48 个月时使用变焦技术,受试者的视力与基线相比提高了 32 个 ETDRS 字母(标准误差 5.1),95% 置信区间(13.4,49.9;P < 0.0001)。结论在因 AMD 导致视力严重下降的 GA 患者中进行 PRIMA 视网膜下植入手术是可行的,而且耐受性良好,48 个月内自然周边视力没有下降。光电神经刺激提供的人工中心视力使患者能够可靠地识别字母和字母序列,通过变焦,可改善视力达 8 ETDRS 线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology science
Ophthalmology science Ophthalmology
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
89 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Cover ChatGPT-Assisted Classification of Postoperative Bleeding Following Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery Using Electronic Health Record Data Analysis of ChatGPT Responses to Ophthalmic Cases: Can ChatGPT Think like an Ophthalmologist?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1