{"title":"Utilization and perception of a digital clinical tracking tool in undergraduate nursing education","authors":"Zahra Shajani EdD, RN , Catherine M. Laing PhD, RN , Amanda O'Rae MPH, RN , Justin Burkett MN, RN, CHSE , Kaleigh Peters BNSc, RN","doi":"10.1016/j.teln.2024.02.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Evaluating undergraduate nursing students’ clinical performance is a complex practice that relies on outdated methods that do not align with the growing use of technology in nursing curricula. This study is an exploration of nursing students’ and clinical instructors’ experiences using a digital evaluation tool or traditional paper-based evaluation tool.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Third year nursing students and clinical instructors were given the opportunity to use a digital or paper-based evaluation tool during one semester; a survey was sent to all participants at the end of the semester.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Student survey responses indicated that they preferred the digital evaluation tool as it provided for timely and specific in self-reflection and instructor feedback that was easily accessible.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>A digital evaluation tool is effective in supporting nursing students in the clinical evaluation process through encouraging reflection on specific learning behaviors, timely feedback from instructors, and an overall improvement in their clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46287,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","volume":"19 3","pages":"Pages e494-e499"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724000374/pdfft?md5=0e4ab161d9afc9c98adbe8ab4f0c5a44&pid=1-s2.0-S1557308724000374-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724000374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Evaluating undergraduate nursing students’ clinical performance is a complex practice that relies on outdated methods that do not align with the growing use of technology in nursing curricula. This study is an exploration of nursing students’ and clinical instructors’ experiences using a digital evaluation tool or traditional paper-based evaluation tool.
Methods
Third year nursing students and clinical instructors were given the opportunity to use a digital or paper-based evaluation tool during one semester; a survey was sent to all participants at the end of the semester.
Results
Student survey responses indicated that they preferred the digital evaluation tool as it provided for timely and specific in self-reflection and instructor feedback that was easily accessible.
Discussion
A digital evaluation tool is effective in supporting nursing students in the clinical evaluation process through encouraging reflection on specific learning behaviors, timely feedback from instructors, and an overall improvement in their clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Teaching and Learning in Nursing is the Official Journal of the National Organization of Associate Degree Nursing. The journal is dedicated to the advancement of Associate Degree Nursing education and practice, and promotes collaboration in charting the future of health care education and delivery. Topics include: - Managing Different Learning Styles - New Faculty Mentoring - Legal Issues - Research - Legislative Issues - Instructional Design Strategies - Leadership, Management Roles - Unique Funding for Programs and Faculty