Comparison of the efficacy of 75 mg aspirin versus 150 mg aspirin for prevention of preeclampsia in patients at high risk for preeclampsia

Dr. Natasha Bushra, Dr. Wardah Saeed, Dr. Tayyaba Rashid, Dr. Mahwish Iqbal
{"title":"Comparison of the efficacy of 75 mg aspirin versus 150 mg aspirin for prevention of preeclampsia in patients at high risk for preeclampsia","authors":"Dr. Natasha Bushra, Dr. Wardah Saeed, Dr. Tayyaba Rashid, Dr. Mahwish Iqbal","doi":"10.37723/jumdc.v15i1.898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Preeclampsia is a significant contributor to maternal health challenges. Emphasizing prevention over cure is a guiding principle in healthcare. As a reliable measure to forestall hypertension and its associated complications during pregnancy, aspirin is widely embraced. The early identification of risk factors plays a crucial role in the primary prevention of preeclampsia. Post-risk stratification, aspirin emerges as a pivotal player in the preventive strategy for individuals identified as high-risk for pre-eclampsia. To assess the effectiveness of 75 mg aspirin against 150 mg aspirin in preventing preeclampsia among individuals identified as having a high risk for the condition. \nMETHODOLOGY: A quasi-experimental study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Services Hospital, Lahore, from 27-12-2019 to 27-6-2020.240 patients were enrolled in the study, which was later divided into two groups. Group A received treatment with 75 mg aspirin, while Group B was administered 150 mg aspirin. Efficacy was determined based on whether blood pressure levels were below 140/90 mmHg, and proteinuria was rated as <+1 using the dipstick method. \nRESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 28.54±6.83 years, and the mean gestational age of the patients was 15.30±1.69 weeks. In the 75 mg group, the efficacy was achieved in 94(78.3%) patients, whereas in the 150 mg group, the efficacy was achieved in 108(90.0%) patients (p-value=0.013). \nCONCLUSION: This study concludes that the efficacy of 150 mg aspirin significantly surpasses that of 75 mg aspirin in preventing preeclampsia among high-risk pregnant patients.","PeriodicalId":178216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of University Medical &amp; Dental College","volume":" 677","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of University Medical &amp; Dental College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37723/jumdc.v15i1.898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Preeclampsia is a significant contributor to maternal health challenges. Emphasizing prevention over cure is a guiding principle in healthcare. As a reliable measure to forestall hypertension and its associated complications during pregnancy, aspirin is widely embraced. The early identification of risk factors plays a crucial role in the primary prevention of preeclampsia. Post-risk stratification, aspirin emerges as a pivotal player in the preventive strategy for individuals identified as high-risk for pre-eclampsia. To assess the effectiveness of 75 mg aspirin against 150 mg aspirin in preventing preeclampsia among individuals identified as having a high risk for the condition. METHODOLOGY: A quasi-experimental study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Services Hospital, Lahore, from 27-12-2019 to 27-6-2020.240 patients were enrolled in the study, which was later divided into two groups. Group A received treatment with 75 mg aspirin, while Group B was administered 150 mg aspirin. Efficacy was determined based on whether blood pressure levels were below 140/90 mmHg, and proteinuria was rated as <+1 using the dipstick method. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 28.54±6.83 years, and the mean gestational age of the patients was 15.30±1.69 weeks. In the 75 mg group, the efficacy was achieved in 94(78.3%) patients, whereas in the 150 mg group, the efficacy was achieved in 108(90.0%) patients (p-value=0.013). CONCLUSION: This study concludes that the efficacy of 150 mg aspirin significantly surpasses that of 75 mg aspirin in preventing preeclampsia among high-risk pregnant patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较 75 毫克阿司匹林和 150 毫克阿司匹林对高危先兆子痫患者预防先兆子痫的疗效
背景与目标:子痫前期是孕产妇健康面临挑战的一个重要因素。预防重于治疗是医疗保健的指导原则。作为预防妊娠期高血压及其相关并发症的可靠措施,阿司匹林受到广泛欢迎。早期识别风险因素在子痫前期的一级预防中起着至关重要的作用。在对风险进行分层后,阿司匹林在被确定为子痫前期高危人群的预防策略中发挥着关键作用。目的:评估 75 毫克阿司匹林和 150 毫克阿司匹林在预防子痫前期高危人群中的有效性。方法:2019 年 12 月 27 日至 2020 年 6 月 27 日,拉合尔服务医院妇产科进行了一项准实验研究。A 组接受 75 毫克阿司匹林治疗,B 组服用 150 毫克阿司匹林。疗效以血压是否低于 140/90 mmHg 为标准,蛋白尿则用量取法评定为 <+1。结果:患者的平均年龄为(28.54±6.83)岁,平均孕周为(15.30±1.69)周。在 75 毫克组中,94(78.3%)名患者获得了疗效,而在 150 毫克组中,108(90.0%)名患者获得了疗效(P 值=0.013)。结论:本研究得出结论,在预防高危孕妇子痫前期方面,150 毫克阿司匹林的疗效明显优于 75 毫克阿司匹林。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Online Teaching and its challenges faced by Anatomists in Pakistan: A post-pandemic Knowledge, Attitude, and Perception regarding antibiotic use and its associated resistance among the general public in Lahore, Pakistan. Pause procedure to enhance learning during the lectures in Medical Colleges Impact of transurethral resection of the prostate on erectile function in benign prostatic hyperplasia patients: a descriptive study at a tertiary care hospital Multidisciplinary care plan and adherence to clinical practice guidelines is needed to improve breast cancer outcome in Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1