Treatment of Refractory Status Epilepticus With Continuous Intravenous Anesthetic Drugs: A Systematic Review.

IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY JAMA neurology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0108
Yu Kan Au, Mohammed F Kananeh, Rahul Rahangdale, Timothy Eoin Moore, Gregory A Panza, Nicolas Gaspard, Lawrence J Hirsch, Andres Fernandez, Syed Omar Shah
{"title":"Treatment of Refractory Status Epilepticus With Continuous Intravenous Anesthetic Drugs: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Yu Kan Au, Mohammed F Kananeh, Rahul Rahangdale, Timothy Eoin Moore, Gregory A Panza, Nicolas Gaspard, Lawrence J Hirsch, Andres Fernandez, Syed Omar Shah","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Multiple continuous intravenous anesthetic drugs (CIVADs) are available for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus (RSE). There is a paucity of data comparing the different types of CIVADs used for RSE.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review and compare outcome measures associated with the initial CIVAD choice in RSE in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>Data sources included English and non-English articles using Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Web of Science (January 1994-June 2023) as well as manual search. Study selection included peer-reviewed studies of 5 or more patients and at least 1 patient older than 12 years with status epilepticus refractory to a benzodiazepine and at least 1 standard antiseizure medication, treated with continuously infused midazolam, ketamine, propofol, pentobarbital, or thiopental. Independent extraction of articles was performed using prespecified data items. The association between outcome variables and CIVAD was examined with an analysis of variance or χ2 test where appropriate. Binary logistic regressions were used to examine the association between outcome variables and CIVAD with etiology, change in mortality over time, electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring (continuous vs intermittent), and treatment goal (seizure vs burst suppression) included as covariates. Risk of bias was addressed by listing the population and type of each study.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 66 studies with 1637 patients were included. Significant differences among CIVAD groups in short-term failure, hypotension, and CIVAD substitution during treatment were observed. Non-epilepsy-related RSE (vs epilepsy-related RSE) was associated with a higher rate of CIVAD substitution (60 of 120 [50.0%] vs 11 of 43 [25.6%]; odds ratio [OR], 3.11; 95% CI, 1.44-7.11; P = .006) and mortality (98 of 227 [43.2%] vs 7 of 63 [11.1%]; OR, 17.0; 95% CI, 4.71-109.35; P < .001). Seizure suppression was associated with mortality (OR, 7.72; 95% CI, 1.77-39.23; P = .005), but only a small subgroup was available for analysis (seizure suppression: 17 of 22 [77.3%] from 3 publications vs burst suppression: 25 of 98 [25.5%] from 12 publications). CIVAD choice and EEG type were not predictors of mortality. Earlier publication year was associated with mortality, although the observation was no longer statistically significant after adjusting SEs for clustering.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Epilepsy-related RSE was associated with lower mortality compared with other RSE etiologies. A trend of decreasing mortality over time was observed, which may suggest an effect of advances in neurocritical care. The overall data are heterogeneous, which limits definitive conclusions on the choice of optimal initial CIVAD in RSE treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0108","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Multiple continuous intravenous anesthetic drugs (CIVADs) are available for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus (RSE). There is a paucity of data comparing the different types of CIVADs used for RSE.

Objective: To systematically review and compare outcome measures associated with the initial CIVAD choice in RSE in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

Evidence review: Data sources included English and non-English articles using Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Web of Science (January 1994-June 2023) as well as manual search. Study selection included peer-reviewed studies of 5 or more patients and at least 1 patient older than 12 years with status epilepticus refractory to a benzodiazepine and at least 1 standard antiseizure medication, treated with continuously infused midazolam, ketamine, propofol, pentobarbital, or thiopental. Independent extraction of articles was performed using prespecified data items. The association between outcome variables and CIVAD was examined with an analysis of variance or χ2 test where appropriate. Binary logistic regressions were used to examine the association between outcome variables and CIVAD with etiology, change in mortality over time, electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring (continuous vs intermittent), and treatment goal (seizure vs burst suppression) included as covariates. Risk of bias was addressed by listing the population and type of each study.

Findings: A total of 66 studies with 1637 patients were included. Significant differences among CIVAD groups in short-term failure, hypotension, and CIVAD substitution during treatment were observed. Non-epilepsy-related RSE (vs epilepsy-related RSE) was associated with a higher rate of CIVAD substitution (60 of 120 [50.0%] vs 11 of 43 [25.6%]; odds ratio [OR], 3.11; 95% CI, 1.44-7.11; P = .006) and mortality (98 of 227 [43.2%] vs 7 of 63 [11.1%]; OR, 17.0; 95% CI, 4.71-109.35; P < .001). Seizure suppression was associated with mortality (OR, 7.72; 95% CI, 1.77-39.23; P = .005), but only a small subgroup was available for analysis (seizure suppression: 17 of 22 [77.3%] from 3 publications vs burst suppression: 25 of 98 [25.5%] from 12 publications). CIVAD choice and EEG type were not predictors of mortality. Earlier publication year was associated with mortality, although the observation was no longer statistically significant after adjusting SEs for clustering.

Conclusions and relevance: Epilepsy-related RSE was associated with lower mortality compared with other RSE etiologies. A trend of decreasing mortality over time was observed, which may suggest an effect of advances in neurocritical care. The overall data are heterogeneous, which limits definitive conclusions on the choice of optimal initial CIVAD in RSE treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
持续静脉注射麻醉药物治疗难治性癫痫状态:系统回顾。
重要性:目前有多种持续静脉麻醉药物(CIVADs)可用于治疗难治性癫痫状态(RSE)。对用于 RSE 的不同类型 CIVAD 进行比较的数据很少:目的:根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》指南,系统综述和比较与RSE初始CIVAD选择相关的结果指标:数据来源包括使用 Embase、MEDLINE、PubMed 和 Web of Science(1994 年 1 月至 2023 年 6 月)以及人工检索的英文和非英文文章。研究选择包括同行评议的 5 名或以上患者的研究,以及至少 1 名年龄大于 12 岁的苯二氮卓类药物和至少 1 种标准抗癫痫药物难治性癫痫状态患者,采用连续输注咪达唑仑、氯胺酮、异丙酚、戊巴比妥或硫喷妥类药物治疗的研究。采用预先指定的数据项对文章进行独立提取。在适当的情况下,采用方差分析或χ2检验来检验结果变量与CIVAD之间的关联。使用二元逻辑回归来检验结果变量与CIVAD之间的关联,病因、死亡率随时间的变化、脑电图(EEG)监测(连续性与间歇性)和治疗目标(癫痫发作与爆发抑制)被列为协变量。针对偏倚风险,列出了每项研究的研究对象和类型:共纳入了 66 项研究,涉及 1637 名患者。观察到各组 CIVAD 在治疗期间的短期失败、低血压和 CIVAD 替代方面存在显著差异。非癫痫相关的 RSE(vs 癫痫相关的 RSE)与较高的 CIVAD 替换率(120 例中的 60 例 [50.0%] vs 43 例中的 11 例 [25.6%];比值比 [OR],3.11;95% CI,1.44-7.11;P = .006)和死亡率(227 例中的 98 例 [43.2%] vs 63 例中的 7 例 [11.1%];OR,17.0;95% CI,4.71-109.35;P 结论和相关性:与其他 RSE 病因相比,与癫痫相关的 RSE 死亡率较低。随着时间的推移,死亡率呈下降趋势,这可能与神经重症护理的进步有关。总体数据各不相同,这限制了在 RSE 治疗中选择最佳初始 CIVAD 的明确结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA neurology
JAMA neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
41.90
自引率
1.70%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: JAMA Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal for physicians caring for people with neurologic disorders and those interested in the structure and function of the normal and diseased nervous system. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry began publication in 1919 and, in 1959, became 2 separate journals: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, their names changed to JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Neurology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications.
期刊最新文献
Deferiprone in Alzheimer Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Immediate or Delayed Statin in Acute Atherosclerotic Ischemia. Immediate or Delayed Statin in Acute Atherosclerotic Ischemia-Reply. Remembering the Physician's Humanity-Physicians Are Humans Too. Alzheimer Disease as a Clinical-Biological Construct-An International Working Group Recommendation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1